THE PYRRHIC VICTORY OF HILLARY-WS in IOWA

THE PYRRHIC VICTORY OF HILLARY-WS in IOWA

LA VICTORIA PIRRICA DE Wall Street & HILLARY IN IOWA

UPDATE: Feb 2 11:30 ET. The counting of votes have been adjusted SANDERS & HILLARY  are tied 50/50. The allocation of delegate has not been adjusted yet. 
 
Hugo Adan Feb 2, 2016

1- Who financed Hillary? Everybody knows that Wall Street mafia and associated bankers–the ones who represent the 1% of America- is behind the super-packs. That is the meaning of her transitory victory among the Dems in the Iowa caucus. It was for her easy to buy this pre-election in Iowa. Of course there is a mismatch between the Mlls invested in buying votes in Iowa and the one point difference 50% vs.49% she got. The idea that the winner in Iowa is the future President is based in a myth, it is a type of ritual fostered for the corporate TV media & their Polls  (the so called presstitude) to see who is able to pay more in this nasty game-business called democracy.  

The real FACT is that never before we are facing the type of economic and geo-political panorama we face today. The neoliberal collapse is eminent, a huge depression similar to the one in 1930 is at portas and the chances of WW3 are very close as never before. This makes very transitory the victory of Hillary Clinton. There won’t be progress in America future with her. She represents just the opposite of progress. She pretend to win the election like Hitler in Germany by fostering war monguersim and defending the current  obsolete neoliberal system. Her contradictory statements on the future of America  (usual lies on her), plus her open attach to the debacle of a neo- liberal system that is obsolete (it only benefit  the 1% of mafia of profiteers who finance her campaign), plus her proven inefficiency in power, make her victory unsustainable and pyrrhic.

2- One of the key real winners in IOWA were teams from the Presstitude who run the ENTRANCE POLLS (ENPO). The party that pays more for Enpo gets the top. So, it is the Enpo that decides who is the winner before the real vote start. How many people decide their vote the day of the election? Nobody Knows but it is assumed that there is a large percentage. MSNBC interview some of them early morning and the answer to “Who is going to win” was “I did not decided yet”. The same corp media already showed her as the projected winner. FOR MSNBC AND RELATED MEDIA HILLARY WAS THE PROJECTED WINNER (50% to her & 44% to Sanders) said in red prints this media. Certainly MSNBC was bought by Hillary as Fox was bought by T Cruz, besides investing in ABC & NBC. This is the way of buying elections in America, this is electoral fraud in developed countries of Europe, but not here. The GOP made clear early morning that “TED CRUZ IS THE PROJECTED TO WINNER IN  IOWA REPUBLICAN CAUCUS: said FOX, ABC, NBC. 
So, the IOWA Caucus was a fraud set up in anticipation.

3- When the final result came late night, Trump said that Cruz win today will not affect the final nomination. Meaning: the electorate in IOWA is conservative & it stand to reason the winning of Cruz. He was happy with the 5% difference against him. The same could be said –and with more reason- in the case of Hillary, not only because of the money she invested in the corp presstitude, but because she tried to win progressive votes among the Dems party –and the progressive did not vote her - (this was her last lie “I’m progressive like Sanders”), that is why she didn’t get the 4 points expected and instead she got only less than one 1 point difference in relation to Sanders. In truth, Sanders was the real winner. The real progressive voter in IOWA defeated Hillary scum “I’m progressive like Sanders”. This  will be more evident in the next pre-election to nominate the final candidate, if and only if, fairness is set and NOT fraudulent polls are allowed. Otherwise Sanders has the right to get out from this party and go with the independent  PEOPLE FRONT TO RE-BUILT AMERICA.

4-Summing up,

A- It is very important to limit the fraud done by ENTRANCE POLLS  since this is one way of rigging elections. The setting of preferences by buying teams in the corporate TV media is naked fraud and it should be banned by consensus among all candidates. Not entrance pools at all, but pool once the vote is done could be allowed if inclusion, neutrality and highly tech issues selecting samples is considered. Since elections are very sensitive topic in socio political terms, is preferred to demand people to wait until official results are concluded.

B- It is much more important to disclose donors of super-packs.  People have the right to know who the investors in elections. At the end, Super-packs should be abolished. The principle of “equality in voting” should prevail, NOT the interest of private companies. Otherwise people preference is rigged and free & democratic elections banned. As R Dahl said: “citizens collectively constitute the demos”, So, they –not private interest- should be taken equality into account in all matters of democracy & elections.

C- If legality issues are at stake on super-packs (tax evasion, for instance) the money confiscated should be invested in hiring a special c-SPAN program for debates and the whole process of election. No more private business with elections. Let’s start by disclosing donors to super-packs and then we should create alliances to suppress any rule allowing super-packs. Super-packs should be considered a crime against democracy. That should be the agreement between dems and reps parties if they care for democracy in America and if they want to continue existing. Otherwise, we will continue having a nasty game-business called democracy, the most deplorable one worldwide.

====