Submitted by Tyler
Durden on 02/03/2016
INTRODUCTION
Conspiracies are real. There are
many more of them than people are aware. Many government conspiracies
are heavily documented by governments themselves with the official records
demonstrating the conspiracies openly available to the public. These conspiracies alone are sufficient to chastise those
uninformed Western peoples who go around saying, “our government would never
kill its own people." False flag attacks are used by
governments in order to pursue secret agendas that they cannot publicly
acknowledge. It is late in the game. If you do not
stand up for truth, you will have no freedom as there is no freedom without
truth.
---
ARTICLE CONTENT
“This conjunction of an immense
military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American
experience. The total influence — economic,
political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every
office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need
for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave
implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the
very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard
against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought,
by the military–industrial complex. The potential
for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or
democratic processes. We should take nothing for
granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper
meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our
peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.”
- President Dwight D.
Eisenhower
Dwight D. Eisenhower was a five-star general in charge of
the Normandy Invasion and a popular two-term President of the United States. Today he would be called a “conspiracy theorist.”
Were Ike to be issuing his warning from the White House
today, conservative Republicans like Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Marco
Rubio (R-FL) would be screaming at Ike for impugning
the motives of “the patriotic industry that protects our freedom.”
Neoconservatives such as William Kristol would be demanding
to know why President Eisenhower was issuing warnings about our own
military-industrial complex instead of warning about the threat presented by
the Soviet military.
The presstitute media would be
implying that Ike was going a bit senile in his old age, a tactic
the presstitutes used against President Reagan as he struggled to end
stagflation and the Cold War.
By January 17, 1961, when Eisenhower issued his warning in
his farewell address to the American People, it was already too late. Cold Warriors had had their hooks into the American taxpayer
for 15 years after the end of WW II, and the military-industrial complex had
replaced “mom and apple pie” as the most venerated and entrenched US interest.
The Dulles brothers ran the State Department and CIA and overthrew
governments at will. (Read
The Brothers)
The military-industrial complex had learned that regardless
of the protestations of high-ranking military officers, no cost-overrun, no
matter how egregious, went unpaid. Armaments
industries and military bases were spread all over the country and
were important considerations for every senator and many congressional
districts. The chairmen of House and Senate military appropriations
subcommittees and armed services committees were already dependent on campaign
contributions from the military-industrial complex and for cushy jobs should
they lose an election.
The Cold War was a profitable
business that served many, and that is why it lasted so long.
There was never any threat of the Red Army invading Europe.
Stalin declared “socialism in one country” and purged the Communist Party of
the Trotskyist element that preached world revolution. An accommodation could
have been reached, except that for the first time ever the military-industrial
complex saw that it could keep the war business going for decades and perhaps
forever.
George F. Kennan predicted that should the Soviet Union
“sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean,” another adversary would have to
be invented. “Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the American economy.”
When the Soviet Union collapsed
in 1991, the “Soviet threat” was replaced with the “Muslim threat” and the “War
on Terror” took over from the Cold War. Despite a succession of
false flag attacks and warnings of a “thirty years war,” a few thousand lightly
armed jihadists were an insufficient replacement for the Soviet Union and its
thousands of nuclear ICBMs. It was an uncomfortable notion that the “world’s
only superpower” could not dispose of a few terrorists.
So we are back to the Cold War
with Russia. The propaganda is fast and
furious. “Putin is the new Hitler.” “Russia invaded Ukraine.” Russia
is about to invade the Baltics and Poland.” “Putin is a corrupt
multi-billionaire.” “Putin is scheming to recreate the Soviet Union.” These
accusations become headlines despite US military spending being a dozen or more
times higher than Russian military spending and the Russian government
expressing no hegemonic aspirations.
Eisenhower’s sucessor, John F.
Kennedy, realized that the military-security complex was a threat, but he
underestimated the threat and paid for it with his life when he
stood up to the military-security complex. In stating this fact I have joined
Eisenhower as a conspiracy theorist. (For
a hair-raising account of the threat posed to President Kennedy by General
Lyman Lemnitzer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, read chapter three in
Richard Cottrell’s book, Gladio, NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe.)
Conspiracies are real. There
are many more of them than people are aware. Many government
conspiracies are heavily documented by governments themselves with the official
records demonstrating the conspiracies openly available to the public. Just
google, for example, Operation Gladio or the Northwoods Project. These conspiracies alone are sufficient to chastise those
uninformed Western peoples who go around saying, “our government would never
kill its own people.”
Perhaps Russian studies provided my
introduction to government conspiracies against their own people. I
learned that the Tsar’s secret police set off bombs and killed people in order
to blame and arrest labor agitators. I was skeptical of this account and
wondered if it was a reflection of left-wing bias against Tsarist Russia. Some
years later I asked my colleague, Robert Conquest, at the Hoover Institution at
Stanford University if the account was true. He replied that the story is true as
is known from the released secret police files that are part of the Hoover
Institution’s archives.
False flag attacks are used by
governments in order to pursue secret agendas that they cannot publicly
acknowledge. If President George W.
Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had said:
“We
are going to attack Iraq and a half dozen other countries in order to exercise
hegemony over the Middle East, steal their oil, and clear the path for Israel
to steal the entirety of the West Bank of Palestine, diverting taxpayers’
resources from serving the American people into the pockets of the armaments
industries and spilling the blood of your parents, spouses, children, and
siblings," even the American sheeple would have resisted.
Instead, following the famous advice
of Hitler’s chief propagandist, they said: “Our country has been
attacked!”
Generally speaking, an observant
person with a bit of education can recognize a false flag attack.
However, few people pay attention beyond what the official media says, and the
media no longer investigates and questions but simply repeats the official
story. Therefore, only a few realize what has really happened, and when these
few open their mouths they are discredited as “conspiracy theorists.”
This method of control might be
wearing thin. There have been so many false flag “terrorist attacks” in the
21st century that there are now thousands of experts labeled as “conspiracy
theorist.” For example, the 9/11 Truth Movement consists of
thousands of high rise architects, structural engineers, demolition experts,
nano-chemists, physicists, firefighters and first responders, civilian and
military pilots, and former high government officials. Collectively these
experts represent far more knowledge and experience than the 9/11 Commission,
which did nothing but write down whatever the government told the commission,
NIST, a collection of people whose incomes and careers depend on the
government, and the presstitutes who can barely manage arithemetic, much less
the mathematics of controlled demolition.
The neoconservatives, who controlled the George W. Bush
regime, called for a “New Pearl Harbor” so that they could begin their wars of
conquest in the Middle East. A “New Pearl Harbor” is
what 9/11 gave them. Was this a coincidence or a Gulf of Tonkin or a
Reichstag fire or a Tzarist secret police or Operation Gladio bomb?
THE CHARGE, “CONSPIRACY THEORY,”
IS USED TO PREVENT INVESTIGATION.
9/11 was not investigated. Indeed, as many experts have
pointed out, there was a conscious effort to remove and destroy the evidence
before it could be investigated. The 9/11 families had to lobby and protest for
a solid year before the Bush regime consented to the totally controlled 9/11
Commission.
The Boston Marathon Bombing
was not investigated. A scripted story was issued and repeated by the
media. The San Bernardino shootings were
not investigated. Again, a pre-scripted story took the place of investigation.
The success of false flag attacks
in the US led to their use in the UK and France. The Charlie Hebdo
affair was not investigated and the official explanation makes no sense. The
story has been closed with all the loose ends dangling. For example, why did a
French police official investigating the crime allegedly commit suicide in his
police office in the early hours of the morning, and why was his family denied
the autopsy report? What happened to this disappeared story? Why did the police
finger a third participant in the attack as the “getaway driver” who had an
iron clad alibi? If the police were so totally wrong about this member of the
gang, how do we know they are right about the two men they shot to death. How
come alleged perpetrators of “terrorist attacks” are always killed before they
can talk? How come the only story we ever get is what the government says?
How can people be so gullible after the Gulf of Tonkin,
Operation Gladio, etc.?
Apparently the Charlie Hebdo
attack was insufficient for the purpose, and now France has had what is
called “the Paris attack,” an even more unbelievable event, evidence for which
is missing. This false flag attack was too much for Kevin Barrett who assembled
a collection of skeptical essays from 26 people into a book, Another
French False Flag: Bloody Tracks From Paris To San Bernardino.
Twenty-four of these contributors do not believe the
official story. Does this make them “conspiracy theorists,” or does this make
them brave souls who are concerned that Reichstag fire type events are
replacing Western civil liberty with fascist police states?
Ask yourself, why are those
trying to preserve liberty denounced?
What incentive does contributor A.K. Dewdney, Professor Emeritus at
the University of Western Ontario, author of ten books about science and
mathematics, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Philip Giraldi, former CIA case officer and
Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, have to be a
conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Anthony Hall, Professor of Globalization Studies
at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, whose latest book has been
endorsed by the American Library Association as “a scholarly tour de force,”
have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Mujahid Kamran, Vice Chancellor of Punjab
University, Lahore, Pakistan, a Fulbright Scholar and recipient of numerous
awards, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Stephen Lendman, syndicated columnist and host on
the Progressive Radio News Hour, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does James Petras, Bartle Professor of Sociology at
Binghamton University, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Alain Soral, one of France’s public intellectuals,
have to be a conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Robert David Steele, former CIA Clandestine
Services Officer, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
The neocons’ whores in the Western
media who call these people “conspiracy theorists” are so stupid and
unintelligent as to be unqualified to express any opinion.
DEAR WESTERN PEOPLES,
if you wish to be able to walk down the streets of your cities without being
accosted by police, demanded to present identity papers, searched, detained
indefinitely or assassinated without due process of law, if you wish to be able
to express your opinion about “your” government and its use of your tax
payments, if you wish to be able to discuss current affairs or your personal
affairs without being recorded by the NSA or the equivalent in your own country
or by both, if you wish to be able to act on your moral conscience and to
protest the violence the West applies to Muslims and others unfavored by powerful
Western interests, such as Palestinians, if you wish to live in the freedom
that was achieved in the West after centuries of struggle, wake up, find time
from less meaningful pursuits to become aware of what is being stolen from you.
It is late in the game. If you do not stand up for
truth, you will have no freedom as there is no freedom without truth.
….
----
===
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario