The Half Dozen Biggest Reasons
By Joachim Hagopian. Global Research,
February 05, 2016
…EXTRACTS…
FIRST REASON : Dishonest fraud in Iowa + announcing victory
when people vote excluded
The very first state tally of delegate votes leading to
the 2016 presidential election bears strong indication of voter fraud. It’s been
reported that Hillary Clinton instructed her staff in
Iowa to rig the caucus voting by falsely standing in the O’Malley corner of the
room when the final precinct hand counts are tallied.
Since Martin
O’Malley supporters fell drastically short with only about 1% of the required 15% “viability threshold” needed for his delegate votes in
each precinct to be included in the final count, standard Iowa caucus protocol stipulates that any O’Malley voters
would then be given the option to back either Clinton or Bernie Sanders in a
final tally.
But
Hillary already cheated having dictated to her staff to go and falsely be
counted as O’Malley supporters voting for Hillary in the final count when she
knew O’Malley supporters would by default favor Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. That’s the first major discrepancy
coming out of Iowa earlier this week implicating voter fraud in the caucus.
Ironically back in the 2008 Obama vs. Hillary campaign cycle, it was Hillary
crying afoul when the Obama camp cut a deal with Bill Richardson supporters to
use this very same unethical, deceitful tactic that the already untrustworthy,
win-at-all-cost Hillary’s now apparently pulled in Iowa.
...
THE SECOND EVEN MORE
BLATANT EVIDENCE Microsoft’ Bill Gates meddling in her
favor + CFR
that the Iowa state caucus and entire Democratic Party
presidential election process has been rigged is that mega-giant corporation Microsoft founder Bill Gates is now in
charge of counting both the Democratic and Republican votes in this year’s
state primary elections.
Tech savvy Betanews journalist Brian Fagioli recently had said
about Microsoft counting votes:
Closed source technologies from
companies like Microsoft could, in theory, contain backdoors or vulnerabilities
that hackers and evildoers could exploit. Even worse, Microsoft or its employees
could purposely alter voting software to influence outcomes.
Combine that reality with the all too cozy relationship between Microsoft and the
Clintons and you have a suspiciously compromised conflict of interest.
The fact is the Gates Foundation along with Microsoft employees have
literally donated millions of dollars to Hillary and
the Clinton Foundation. As Microsoft’s Executive VP and Chief
Strategy Officer up until last year, Mark
Penn has also been called Hillary’s “pollster.
Gates also happens to
be the second largest financier for Republican Florida Senator
Mark Rubio. That the Clinton-Gates-Rubio ties run
so deep should suffice as cut-and-dry evidence proving that a serious conflict
of interest breach should have legally prevented Microsoft from any stake in
this year’s election.
[ In addition] another
diehard Hillary loyalist Debbie Wasserman Schultz is in charge as
National Chair of the Democratic National Committee, this fact -in and of
itself- signify
yet another serious conflict of interest advantage heavily favoring the deep
pocketed Hillary camp. That is the power who are handpicking their
next presidential puppet. And pro-corporate warmonger Hillary’s their guy… or
gal.
First the Supreme Court’s decision in 2010 to permit
oligarchs to legally bribe politicians with unlimited campaign
donations and now mega-corporations playing such a critical determining factor
on who gets elected by vote count despite the fact that corporations’ vested
interest openly favor one candidate over another defies all fair practice
ethics and clearly demonstrates a conflict of interest. So, in today’s
admittedly official oligarchy, special
interests rule in utter contempt and mockery over the Founding Fathers’ notion
that a democratic government should serve the interests of its citizenry as its
voting electorate. Instead what we’re now left with is corporate-political
cronyism where a handful of elitist players move in and out of a shadow
government [with] lobbyists ensuring
unbounded money, power and control in fewer hands.
So what does the
elite do? Ensure
that once again electronic voting will be used to tamper with election results and make certain that without a paper trail
ballot only handpicked CFR
(note 1) -approved candidates like
Hillary obtain their party nomination. Just this fact alone that Microsoft smartphone apps are serving as
this year’s primary electronic vote counter throughout both the Democratic and
Republican presidential election process smacks of in-our-face,
over-the-top foul play.
As a result, the Bernie Sanders camp
took the enterprising initiative and went ahead to develop its own electronic apps in order to
counterbalance the built-in Microsoft bias. In the last couple days their
efforts to review the math sheets signed off by
precinct chairs and cross-checking them with numbers fed to Microsoft apps has
unsurprisingly resulted in the Sanders
staff already finding a number of inconsistencies.(note 2)
...
REASON NUMBER 3 : Exclusion:
90 precincts comprising 5% of all state’s votes not included
that the Iowa caucus was rigged is that both CNN
and The Blaze reported that the final tally was missing votes from 90 Iowa precincts. How can a final
count be considered legitimate and final if not all, especially as large a chunk as 90
precincts comprising 5% of all the state’s total number of votes haven’t even
been included in the final outcome especially in the closest Iowa
caucus contest in history? Early Tuesday morning the Clinton staff had already opportunistically
proclaimed premature victory with a statistical tie of 49.8% to Sanders’ 49.54%
minus the 5% of precinct votes still never counted.
Despite the Iowa Democratic Party acknowledging this
enormous discrepancy, apparently with Hillary backer Debbie Wasserman Schultz, this gargantuan 90 precinct “oversight” appears to have
merely been quickly cast aside like it never even happened. The lame excuse Wasserman’s party used to
explain the missing 90 precincts from the final tally was that the Democratic
Party didn’t have sufficient staff for assignment to all those missing
precinct locations. How much you want to bet that those missing precincts voted
strongly in favor of Sanders?
...
REASON NUMBER 4 Private Press is
legitimizing fraud
to conclude that election fraud occurred in Iowa is that C-SPAN actually
captured on video at the Polk County precinct the caucus chair and the
Clinton precinct captain not even bothering to conduct a final count of the
caucus voters and then the Clinton precinct captain caught lying to the Sanders
precinct captain. This came after an initial count had Sanders with 238 to Clinton’s 218 votes.
But somehow in the end Hillary Clinton suddenly managed to magically gain 14 more
votes for a total of 232 while Bernie Sanders’ count mysteriously slumped to
just 224. Miscounting votes by
deliberate fraud gets inadvertently captured on camera for the world to see
just how the undemocratic beacon of America – land of the not-so-free – in
actuality operates like the closed totalitarian system it is.
REASON NUMBER 5 : Delegate winner
in six precincts were selected by flipping coins
that strongly suggests that voter
fraud took place this week in Iowa is that the results were determined by six coin tosses in a row all
favoring Hillary to ultimately decide the winner. After six county precincts ended up in dead ties between Clinton
and Sanders, by state protocol those six precincts did a coin toss to determine
the winner and in all six counties we’re supposed to actually believe that
Hillary’s tails won. Though Clinton’s known for telling fish tales,
it shouldn’t have overturned the virtually impossible statistical
odds of just 1.56%. Just one more highly incredulous piece to what already
appears to be a criminal case of voter fraud.
...
REASON NUMBER SIX : Hillary represent the 1% of billionaires
who use to rig elections in America
The long history of voter fraud in America takes us to the sixth and final reason to believe
voter fraud marred the Iowa caucus results. With the two George W. Bush stolen elections in both 2000 and again in 2004, it’s become an entrenched American
tradition, proving that electronic fraud can only be remedied by a paper trail
ballot. So in 2016 it may seem hard to believe that archaic coin
tossing, more miscounted and missing votes along with more electronic tampering
minus paper ballots are still tilting and dirtying up the US politics machine.
But pretty much like everything else that’s one wrong in this world, globalist
design wouldn’t have it any other way.
Numerous flagrant lapses in Iowa’s vote count illustrate not only how low and
desperate Hillary Clinton has sunk but also unveils the
depth of corruption in American politics. Additionally it’s a
reflection of Clinton’s frantic race to steal her
party’s nomination prior to her potential indictment for high crime treason after being caught red-handed
as Secretary of State using her own private email server to make illicit
arms deals while selling off America’s national security to highest foreign
bidders and then repeatedly lying about it. Then there’s her arms smuggling that gave rise to
arming ISIS terrorists with heavy weapons and the Benghazi affair where she was
responsible for the murder of four Americans and her culpability
literally dodging the truth with her well-timed accidental fall after that
scandal.
---
----
===
NOTE 1: ON CFR The Council on Foreign
Relations
CFR the Council on Foreign Relations is the international banking special interest group
who always influenced the nomination of either party candidate running for president of the US, They are part of the
so called establishment. Hillary admitted that the CFR Runs the Government l Hillary
Clinton accidentally admits that the CFR runs this nation. Wow. Listen this video: https://youtu.be/5RRWHDYM9w8
CFR also run the power behind news . “One version says that the CFR is an organization
sister to the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Britain), both founded
in 1921 right after World War I when the League of Nations idea failed. The sole
purpose of such organizations is to condition the public to accept a Global
Governance which today is the United Nations. This is the true face of the
so-called Globalists, and Centralized Power is what they are really after.
====
NOTE 2: ON INCONSISTENCIES IN COUNTING VOTES IN OIWA CAUCUS
Man, that Democratic caucus
process smells fishy, doesn’t it?
The influential Des Moines Register called for an audit of the Democratic caucuses after
Bernie Sanders complained over a number of irregularities in the conduct and
the counting of the event:
CONCLUSION :
Dies are loaded in favor of cronyism of Hillary Clinton, but Bernie’s
people REV will defeat her. Meanwhile don't pay attention to fake polls run by Bill Gates-Microsolft in the corporate media.
----
How to fix the
problem? By demanding type of primaries for both parties during the whole process of
presidential nominations. It is important that voters receive a paper trail
ballot to facilitate re-count if anomalies occur. That is the only way to put aside these 19th-century caucus circuses and go forward to eliminate frauds and facilitate much broader forms of inclusion.
---
----
====
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario