jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2019

ND SEP 5 19 SIT EC y POL



ND  SEP  5  19  SIT EC y POL 
ND denounce Global-neoliberal debacle y propone State-Social + Capit-compet in Eco


Stronger and a little larger, Hurricane Dorian is gradually leaving Florida behind, setting its sights on the coasts of Georgia and the Carolinas...
….

ZERO HEDGE  ECONOMICS
Neoliberal globalization is over. Financiers know it, they documented with graphics

Trade-Talks are on again... on like Donkey Kong if markets are to be believed.

So to explain what happened today, the following chart should help (trade accordingly):
See Chart:
The trade world cycle: No Progress is made


Cyclicals dominated as the odds of a China trade deal surged...
See Chart:
Market-Implied Odds of a US-China Trade Deal
Trade Deal is either T’wishful thinking or Trick to ‘boost’ US Econ & then blame China  So far, we haven’t seen any evidence from China to agree on DEAL next M or Next Y.


Bonds don't seem to be buying it though...
See Chart:


Today was among the biggest absolute spikes in 10Y (above 1.50%) and 30Y (above 2.00%) Yields since the election in 2016...
See Chart:
UST 30Y Yield..  start going down


The yield curve steepened on the day but 3m10Y remains deeply inverted...
See Chart:
UST 3m 10Y Spread


The dollar ended the day lower, but roundtripped off overnight lows...
See Chart:
Blooomberg Dollar Index


Yuan is higher overnight but well off the highs, notably divergent from US stocks...
See Chart:


Finally, we should note that while the market has pushed for more and more easing in recent weeks, since The Fed first cut, the macro-economic data has beaten (admittedly low) expectations dramatically...
See Chart:
….
----
----


"... add in the impact of a loss of confidence in the Fed (just as there was a loss of confidence in the BoJ and MoF in Japan), and there is a realistic prospect of a decline below the March 2009 666 low."

Back in August, we wrote that after decades of waiting, for Albert Edwards vindication was finally here - if only outside the US for now - because as per BofA calculations, average non-USD sovereign yields on $19 trillion in global debt had, as of Monday, turned negative for the first time ever at -3bps.
See Fig 1:
Global IG Fixed Income


So instead of diluting Edward's message with trivial tangents, we focus on several key points, the first of which is why if Edwards got the bond bull market so spectacularly right at a time when virtually everyone remains short bonds...
See Chart:
Treasury Ultra Long Non Commercial  Net Specs


.. has he been wrong on stocks, with his calls to short the equity market, which is also explains the genesis of his "permabear" moniker (alternatively, Edwards is the biggest bond permabull in existence). This is what Edwards said:
... my biggest Ice Age mistake was to assume that the US would be like Japan and that subsequent to the 2008 GFC, US policymakers would find it much harder to manipulate the economic and credit cycles. I thought we would return to normal economic cycles with lengths nearer to 40 months.

See Chart:
US economic cycles have got long longer & longer months


If everyone buys bonds, won't stocks also be bid? After all, that's the basis of the Fed model, is it not? Well, here too Edwards has something to say.
The so-called Fed Model (below) was an essential asset allocation reference tool in the 1980s and 1990s. It was thought that this ratio of 10y US bond yield and forward earnings yield (inverse of PE) enjoyed some sort of equilibrium level at 1.0, as for most of that period the ratio oscillated above and below 1.0 (until the Nasdaq/TMT bubble).
See Chart:
The FED model (bond yield/forward earning Yield ratio)


Indeed you see from the chart below that the nominal bond yield/equity yield was not ever stable in the long run if you go back to the 1950s (this chart uses dividend rather than forward earnings yield). The 1982-2000 period was an anomaly in the longer-term context. A fundamentally important Ice Age forecast was that we were going to return to a world where the equity dividend yield would rise above the bond yield and stay above it. It was the 1965-2000 period that I thought was the anomaly. So while market commentators have recently noted that the US 30y bond yield has fallen below the dividend yield I believe that is the natural order.

See Chart:
US 10Y bond yield /S&P dividend yield


But experience has shown us that in a post-bubble world a cyclical recovery could lead to a pause or even reversal of the two PE depressing drivers. And the longer the economic recovery continues the more the markets will believe there is a return to Great Moderation normality and the more it can ignore the Ice Age. That is exactly what has happened, aided by QE.

Indeed the chart below shows that US long-term earnings expectations have done exactly what they did during the late 1990s Nasdaq bubble. The echoes of that time are unerringly similar. Belief in this equity market has been centred around the new large technology, growth stocks typified by the large-cap FAANGs (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Alphabet's Google), rather than TMT generally.
See Chart:
In the late 1990 Nasdaq bubble, Greenspan justified high PEs…
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/nasdaq%20bubble.jpg?itok=0pm5ITff


And finally, there is the issue of a decade of accumulated non-GAAP gimmickry to catch down to:
Despite the recent downtick, S&P Composite long-term eps expectations are still way out of line with both nominal GDP and particularly whole economy profits growth (see chart below, both 5y trailing to match the 5y projection for long-term eps expectations). In a recession, expect the dotted line in the chart below to lurch down sharply as it did in both the last two recessions (shaded areas). That is when you will see equity prices melt away.
See Chart:
US S&P L/T eps way above both nominal GDP growth & whole Econ profit growth 


Which brings us back to Edwards' cataclysmic forecast, that the S&P will tumble below the 666 "generational low" of March 2009. Here is the SocGen strategist's defense of that extremely controversial claim:
How can we possibly believe that the S&P could fall back below its 666 March 2009 low. Simple: I believe the 12-month forward PE will decline to a new lower low compared to the profits nadirs of 2002 (15.5x) and 2009 (10.5x). At the height of a bear market, during the eye of the storm, the equity market does not trade like an auto stock or a copper stock. It does not go to peak PEs of infinity at the bottom of the earnings cycle. Quite the reverse – the market in its panic goes to trough PEs on close to trough earnings.

Which brings us to the doom and gloom conclusion: how Albert envisions the next recession. In a nutshell, it will be right out of Dante's inferno:
In the next recession, as the secular forces of the Ice Age thesis combine with the cyclical chaos of another deep GFC-like event, I would expect the S&P 12m forward PE to collapse from a QE inflated 16½x currently to around a 7x trough eps - while forward earnings fall something like 40% to $100/sh, just as they did in the last recession. Add in the impact of a loss of confidence in the Fed (just as there was a loss of confidence in the BoJ and MoF in Japan), and there is a realistic prospect of a decline below the March 2009 666 low. And with that I must stop.

It took about 20 years but Albert Edwards was eventually proven correct in his bond forecast. For the sake of civilization, one can only hope that his equity forecast is wrong.
….
----
----


US  DOMESTIC POLITICS
Seudo democ duopolico in US is obsolete; it’s full of frauds & corruption. Urge cambio


...the baseline in the Democratic Party is a complete phase out of fossil fuels in the medium- to long-term. The Overton window has very much been moved...
====


Maybe the rate cut was meant as much to give policymakers something to feel good about for themselves. It certainly has done nothing as far as markets go...
====


US-WORLD  ISSUES (Geo Econ, Geo Pol & global Wars)
Global depression is on…China, RU, Iran search for State socialis+K-, D rest in limbo


“I told Donald, ‘if you want, we’ll sell them to you’
====


Delusional? 
====


The global repercussions of Trump's trade wars have a new casualtyUS and European car manufacturers.
See Chart:
….
----
----


...any state agency who wins the arms race in developing a quantum-resistant cryptocurrency couldsecure an appreciable geopolitical edge for its country.
====


"Having failed at piracy, the US resorts to outright blackmail..."
====


Taxpayer money is subsidizing frog-mating studies in Panama, Pakistani ‘woke’ films, and a ‘Green New Deal’ in Peru...
====


SPUTNIK and RT SHOWS
GEO-POL n GEO-ECO  ..Focus on neoliberal expansion via wars & danger of WW3

----
----


NOTICIAS IN SPANISH
Lat Am search f alternatives to neo-fascist regimes & terrorist imperial chaos

REBELLION

ARG: Macri, una mala persona  Ángel Guerra
====
ALAI ORG

====

RT EN ESPAÑOL

----
----

INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE
Deep on the US political crisis: neofascism & internal conflicts that favor WW3


----
----


COUNTER PUNCH
Analysis on US Politics & Geopolitics

Jacques R. Pauwels  The Hitler-Stalin Pact, a Reply
----
----


GLOBAL RESEARCH
Geopolitics & Econ-Pol crisis that leads to more business-wars from US-NATO  allies

----
----

DEMOCRACY NOW
Amy Goodman’  team

-Biden : He’ll Attend a Fossil Fuel Exec’s Fundraiser. Dime quien te compra..te dire Q-e
----
----


PRESS TV
Resume of Global News described by Iranian observers..

----
===

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario