WE MUST START WITH HILLARY CLINTON: P. 4
too crock and
dangerous to be left unlocked
#LOCK HER UP: Hillary Clinton Gradually Losing Veneer of Being 'Too Big to Jail' https://sputniknews.com/politics/201702131050636268-us-clinton-foundation/
While US mainstream media is rife
with rumors about Hillary Clinton's possible political comeback, Wall Street
analyst Charles Ortel and Haitian-born journalist Dady Chery told Sputnik that
the two-time presidential candidate may very soon find herself in a heap of
legal trouble.
It appears that Hillary Clinton has no intention
to leave the stage for the time being, and rumors continue
to circulate about Hillary's comeback as the Democrats'
"heavy artillery"
"I'm certain Trump will
screw up enough that by the fall of '18, Hillary's numbers will be
way up again," former Pennsylvania governor and DNC chair Ed Rendell told Politico.com.
For her part, Clinton, who sustained a resounding defeat
in the 2016 presidential election, never misses a chance to criticize
or mock President Donald Trump.
It seems that
Clinton's past could get in the way of her return to big
politics.
Alleged Fraud: It's too Big
to Remain Swept Under the Rug
"Since 23 October 1997, when the Clinton Foundation was organized,
public filings suggest that approximately $2 billion may have been received
in the form of contributions and grants," Ortel told Sputnik.
"That said, there has
never been a validly performed and legally compliant independent audit
of any part of the Clinton Foundation for any period (part or
full year) of operation. This means that no outsider has ever been able
to ensure that all incoming donations landed in Clinton Foundation
bank accounts. Given their loose (I might argue non-existent) financial
controls, the international spread of their operations, and extreme volatility
in foreign exchange rates, the potential for monies to leak out
(diverted revenues, fake expenses) is substantial," the analyst stressed.
"For example, the largest Clinton Foundation donor, a multilateral
entity based in Switzerland called UNITAID claims that it sent around $650
million towards the Clinton Foundation starting late in 2006. Year-by
year, close review of UNITAID claims made concerning their donations
differ significantly with reports issued for similar years
by the Clinton Foundation," Ortel elaborated.
"In addition
to financial irregularities that are evident following analysis
of Clinton filings and those of significant donors such
as UNITAID (others to investigate and compare include Gates
Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Children's
Investment Fund Foundation (there are at least two — one in UK
and a separate one in the US), and declarations by governments such
as Australia, Norway, Canada, UK, Sweden, Ireland, and others.), one needs
to look carefully at private gains that may have been created
through operation of the Clinton 'charities.' A place to start
is examining the 'Commitments to Action' declared by participants
in the Clinton Global Initiative — here, it seems that many 'donors'
derived benefits and that these benefits were substantial in financial
terms," the analyst said.
However, it's not only up to the US Congress or
President Trump to expedite the process: for their part, the
Foundation's foreign sponsors might raise the issue of the
misappropriation of funds.
"One thing
to consider is that while the Clintons may be able to manipulate
America's bitterly divided political landscape and opaque regulatory system,
they and their 'foundations' are subject to foreign laws, and vulnerable,
in my view, should investigations expand and prosecutions result
in foreign jurisdictions," Ortel told
Sputnik.
===
More on Hillary in the same source
….
====
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario