TO MORE HATE on TRUMP more CHANCES for HIM to WIN the race

TO MORE HATE on TRUMP more CHANCES for HIM to WIN the race

I’m not his supporter.. NO WAY.. I’m in favor of objective realism, and

I believe in VOTES as freedom, as right & as way of building new power

I plan to vote Dr. Jill Stein because I’m socialist, by principles.

If the corporate media continue excluding her from main debates

I’ll will definitely foster ABSTENTION against the rigged system. And..

I’ll demand the Green Party to call Abstention to hit anti-democracy.

....

....

Here my reaction to this art in www.zerohedge.com 

"I Listened To A Trump Supporter... Now I Understand"

... the dominant media narrative characterizing Trump supporters as a bunch of racist, uneducated brutes is pretty much just dishonest, elitist propaganda.

MY ARGUMENT:

 It doesn’t matter the hate of the presstitute on Trump.. as long as they mention his name. The more they say on him.. more propaganda against the real dishonest liar and fraud maker in the opposite site.. Everybody knows that the image Hillary project in the political mirror cannot bet transferred to another person..

No matter what they say on him.. he is going to win the elections.. I’m saying this because I believe in objective realism.. People is fed up with this charade of democracy: both candidates of the duopoly system are billionaires liars and dishonest, supporters of the collapsing neoliberal system. Since the chance for a 3^rd option was thwarted by the betrayal of Sanders, many people distrust the system and either won’t vote or vote in favor of “not evilness” of minority candidates. The “presstitute” hide this reality. They only say that both candidates of the duopoly system have high rate of negative vote.

Decomposition of democracy is a Fact, is an objective reality. In the language of R Dahl we are  transiting  from a “closed oligarchical hegemony” articulated by the “deep-state” and the FED, toward  a “competitive oligarchical system” in which the tough competition between elites of the oligarchy –its internal division- will affect the unity of the FED and introduce real state autonomy in States like Texas and other in the South (perhaps regional separatism from the FED). Either the current Fed and its “deep-state” is recycled and changed radically, as proposed by Trump, or being destroyed by the competition inside the oligarchy.

Clearly some sectors of the oligarchy are not in favor of war with Russia-China-Iran, as Hillary and the military industrial complex endorse. They interests will be affected by WW3, so they won’t endorse it easily. If  world recession comes before war world 3, they may be open to accept an updated version of the Glass Steagal,  as proposed by FDR in similar situation. What after elections and what its relation to WW3 and/or to Global recession?, that is the key Qt. now.  

So far there are only two possible answers for the aftermath of this elections. The 1^st aftermath is the one above: the recycle and radical change of the Fed and its “deep-state” otherwise the competitive division with destroy the FED and create State autonomy or regional one. The 2^nd aftermath of this election could be the open doors to fascism, as described by FDR, the direct observer of fascism in Italy and Nazism in Germany. Fascism can be run by either Hillary or  Trump, more likely by Hillary because of her connection with the military industrial complex. This may happens in the name of national security and to face the human barbarity of WW3 that she is fostering, or in the name of Economic prosperity  for all, if the global recession comes first.

Facing global recession with WW3, will create a huge anti-imperialist reaction at global level. There will be many Benghazi experiments against US embassies and military barracks. The basis of US companies worldwide will be destroyed too and all pro-US regimes will be overcome by military nationalist. The fast end of the empire. I don’t think this option is valid.

Regarding VOTING.  I’m not supporter of Trump.. and much less of Hillary..NO WAY. I’ll vote Dr. Jill Stein -and her VP- because I’m a socialist .. I believe in electoral democracy: 

First as freedom ( we are not obligated to vote or ABSTEIN),  

Second as right  (the political and moral obligation to fight for the eight conditions and principles of real democracy, stated by R Dahl in “Polyarchy”),  

And third as a way of creating PEOPLE’ power against the establishment.  

For all these reasons I will vote for Dr. Jill Stein. If Jill is running in my State –the swing state of Pennsylvania- that will be one more reason to vote her. .. BUT, if at national level, the corp media continue excluding her from main TV debates, I’ll definitely foster ABSTENTION and I’ll demand the Green Party to reject also the current rigged system… and propose to their followers ABSTENTION against the anti-democratic electoral system.  

----

----

ANNEX 1

This is an extract from my article THE RETARDED REALISM of ERIC ZUESSE

A response to his attack to Jill Stein and supporters

We are far away from real democracy or Polyarchical system, as described by R.Dahl. A polyarchy is a system with incomplete democracy –less inclusive as compared to ull democracies in small European States like Switzerland. But at least a polyarchy guarantee two of the 8 conditions for a real democracy: 1- the right and freedom to vote, and,  2- the right and freedom for contestation and opposition, understood as right and freedom to create a new electoral choice. If only two conditions for democracy are considered, we can say that we are close to a polyarchy, but not yet there.

If we considered the other 6 conditions, we are very far away from real democracy:

1- Freedom to form & join political org. It doesn’t exist, we have only two choices. 

2-Freedom of expression. We do not have it: the green party is excluded from main TV debates.

3- Right of vote. We have it but incomplete. Millions of US citizens have been excluded directly (Pretext: not updated registration, ID citizenship is not enough; ex-incarcerated people lost their right to vote in several states) and indirectly: frauds & nasty manipulation of polls). 

4- Elegibility for public offices. It exist but is skewed in favor of the two party system. The top-down authoritarian selection of candidates prevails over the bottom up independent- initiatives. 

5- Rights of political leader to compete for support & votes. It exist but also skewed in favor of the two party system. Their lobby system and big crook corp decide who buy elections.

6- Alternative sources of information It does exist but is sabotaged top down and is about to be closed. 

7- Free and fair elections. If 1 to 5 only partially exist, we do not have complete freedom.  

8- Policy design and policy making submitted to public vote. It only happens in real democracies. We have a Presidential system in which the House & Senate have the right to contest the President decisions, but they are rarely submitted to people's vote for public approval. Referendums and other form of direct consultation, barely exist. vote. We have one day of democracy in the whole year. 

This is the objective reality of democracy: and incomplete & corrupted system top-down.

----

==