ABSTENTION AD PORTAS .. ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME DEBACLE
Hugo Adan Oct.
16-16
This is an extract from my art:
EZ ‘retarded realism
INTRODUCTION
It was sad to see how political actors like Sanders and
intellectuals like Eric Zuesse abandoned their progressive ideas to support representatives of the .1%
: to Hillary Clinton –HC- by Sanders & to Donald Trump –DT- by Eric
Zuesse –EZ- . I call both moves a betrayal to their original position and a
betrayal to the people that follow their political messages. A day after EZ’s article supporting Trump
& demonizing Jill Stein, EZ recanted his support to Trump, but didn’t
rectified his statement on the leader of the Green party. EZ’ zig-zag
reveal the inconsistency of his logic
himself and I don’t care from this fact, as many people don’t. I DO CARE for the arguments used by both of
them.
….
….
My concern in this article is triple: 1st, to
show that the arguments used for Sanders to move out of progressive ideas and
support Hillary, one of the representatives of the 1%, and those used by Eric
Zuesse –EZ- to do the same but in favor of Trump, both are based on flaw logic,
and totally out of the political context (deep level of decomposition of our
democracy). 2nd , What is beyond the big and small political
shocks is the issue ABSTENTION that both
didn’t want to talk about. 3rd,
in the small shock there was a dishonest critique to Jill Stein. EZ assumed
“lack of realism” among those who support a 3rd option.
My point here is to show that :
A- There was not such lack of realism in Jill Stein to
decry both Hillary and Trump. That stand was perfectly consistent for the time
being. Who was inconsistent was EZ in supporting Trump. One prove of
inconsistency was given us by the same EZ who recant his support to Trump in
his initial art I’M A BERNIE SANDERS VOTER: HERE’S WHY I’LL VOTE TRUMP. I will
show that EZ initial stand fall in what is Known as “retarded realism” in three
senses. I will show also that behind the failed “real politics” on democracy
used by EZ, there is an issue that he ignored or wanted to ignore: the issue
Abstention. Jill Stein didn’t go to this point, but is close to it. When she
said that basic conditions for real democracy has been demolished by both
parties –this lead to the exclusion of a 3rd option for both of
them- the logical conclusion is why to legitimize a system that lead to
anti-democracy? I will offer here some more points supporting the logic effect
of exclusion: abstention
B- The exclusion of Trump could
lead also to abstention. That will be a huge blast to current circus.
Time has been changed fast. The solid support that Trump has it 2 weeks ago has
been defied from the top as from the bottom of his Party. If we follow these
phenomena we have to conclude that a 2nd big political shock is
coming to the current political system. Let’s explore some possible issues and
possible events derived from it.
b-1 Trump has been
abandoned by his financiers–group, though his support at the bottom is
apparently intact.
b-2 The Bush mafia inside
the GOP abandoned him too (Bush-s, McCain and the rest). That could be taken as
big favor to Trump, if he simply ignore them or attack them on their
“oil-business” with solid data. They are very discredited people, but with
still some power inside the GOP.
b-3 The mainstream media is now against
Trump and could erode Trump’s support from the masses. He has been forced to
grab firm ties with the military and police and he is doing so, at the cost of
abandoning his initial neutrality on Russia. In recent speeches Trump has
show some support to the option war to
solve international issues and he is now more pro WW3. This fact can erode his
support among young people.
b-4 If in the 3rd debate Trump
does not retake the issue “pacifism” he will definitely will lose part of the
young people. He has to make a balance between war vs diplomacy and show that
the current regime failed both parts and nothing new can be offered by Clinton
but more failures and lost of our soldiers life.
b-5 Trump has to place conditions to the
“presstitute” to break their monopoly support to Clinton (the drug test is
ridiculous, unless used as pretext to “abandon” the debate and invite people to
other TV group). Any mean used on this aim will save his candidacy.
b-6 The Bush mafia (real supporters of
Hillary) has to be put in defense, their only option is to expel Trump from the
GOP party. They are preparing this attack. That will be the greatest favor to
Trump ( unless Row convince them that is
better to use him when he is in power). If Trump is expelled from his Party,
that will be the death of GOP. Either Trump take control of the party by buying the support of bureaucracy inside
the RNC, and if he do not get the majority inside such bureaucracy, he can create
an Independent People Party and bye-bye
GOP forever.
b-7 If 6 happens, the duopoly system will
be a moribund limping duck. If both bureaucracies (GOP-Dems) decide not to
register a new party lead by Trump, they will simply decree their death. Trump
can simply quit from the race and call for ABSTENTION= Hugh political crisis.
This could be the way to say Bye-Bye to NOV 8 and its fake democracy.
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario