LEGITIMIZING ASSAULT TO POWER by ILLEGITIMATE CROOK LEADER P2

LEGITIMIZING ASSAULT TO POWER by ILLEGITIMATE CROOK LEADER P2

Part 2. Updated version

Hugo Adan Sunday 30, 2016

A  system that perpetuates the power of money over Laws and

principles of democracy is a broken system. When it happens,

 when a system is broken,  all its political institutions, starting

with political parties became the less appropriate to its society.

In Lipset’ words, parties could become a strong destabilizing

factor on any political system. (Seigmore Lipset & Stein Rokkan:

“Party System and Voter Alignment”  1967).

Any society needs a Legitimate power, a power with enough

authority  to make their commands, rules and Laws be accepted

and obey by its citizens.  The destruction of  legitimacy start with

one of the parties in a duopoly system. In the US  this problem is

usually mediated and avoided by the so called “deep state”.

But, when “deep state” became also lined to one of the parties,

it created a double mess. First, it helps to legitimize an illegal

assault to power by one party, and by doing so, help to destroy

the basic pillar of current Nation-State. Second, it puts  the

future of our entire society at risk. I’ll say why in the next

paragraph. Meanwhile keep in mind the big mess we are in

today, to understand the EFFORTS  that the FBI is doing.

If an illegitimate party come to power,  it won’t be able to create

authority to exercise power, unless another huge mess is in her

program: the nuke war with RU-China. If so, a fascist order could

transitorily generate political obedience. But immediately after    

war, its effects will come.. if we survive the war. Nobody want a

fascist “order” in the US, neither our nation is ready to survive a

nuke response to our attack to Ru (bunkers are only for the rich).

We are less ready to carry the moral burden of world destruction

in our mind.. and all this to save the obsolete oligarchical power

and their business of war. .. No way!.

Back to Weber,  legitimacy is the central pillar of a democratic

Political order, it is the only way to give institutions and our

leaders the authority to exercise power in a legitimate way. I’m

convinced that this is that FBI is trying to help now.

The FBI is an invited part of the “deep state”. It could’ve help to

stop Hillary’s undemocratic electoral race before, but she got the

support of the US President and a key member of the Supreme

Court. The FBI is trying to correct its initial vacillation & need the

support of the whole Institution and the support of the whole

nation as well in this courageous work.  

Lets check how the power of money broke LAWS & democracy

Principles. Let’s start on how the issue email has has been done

Before. Then we go to Hillary breaking of democratic  principles. 

----

 WHAT WE GOT ON THE ISSUE E-MAIL BEFORE

1-

A month after the primaries start, on March 9, 2016, William Reynolds published the best report on the e-mail scandal: MISSING CLINTON E-MAIL CLAIMS SAUDIS FINANCED BENGHAZI ATTACKS. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-09/missing-clinton-e-mail-claims-saudis-financed-benghazi-attacks. I’m going to extract key points from this report:

1.1 “This missing e-mail from February 16, 2013 only exists in the original leak and states that French and Libyan intelligence agencies had evidence that the In Amenas and Benghazi attacks were funded by “Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.”  Now, however, we have proof that the other three e-mails in the leak were real correspondence from Blumenthal to Clinton that she not only read, but thought highly enough of to send around to others in the State Department. This means we have an e-mail from a trusted Clinton adviser that claims the Saudis funded the Benghazi attack, and not only was this not followed up on, but there is not any record of this e-mail ever existing except for the Russia’s today leak.”

1.2 WHY IS THIS E-MAIL MISSING? 

“At first I assumed it must be due to some sort of cover up, but it’s much simpler than that. The e-mail in question was sent after February 1st, 2013, when John Kerry took over as Secretary of State, so it was not part of the time period being investigated. No one is trying to find a copy of this e-mail, since Clinton wasn’t Secretary of State on February 16th, it wasn’t her job to follow up on it.

“So let’s forget for a minute about the larger legal implications of the e-mail investigation. How can it be that such a revelation about Saudi Arabia was made public in a leak that turned out to be real and no one looked into it? Clearly Sidney Blumenthal was someone that Hillary Clinton trusted. Two months earlier, Secretary Clinton found his insights valuable enough to share with the entire State Department. But two weeks after her job as Secretary of State ends, she receives an e-mail from him claiming Saudi Arabia financed the assassination of an American ambassador and apparently did nothing with this information. Even if she didn’t have to turn over this e-mail to the commission investigating the Benghazi attacks, wouldn’t it be relevant?

Did Secretary Clinton not tell anyone what she knew about alleged Saudi involvement in the attacks because she didn’t want to endanger the millions of dollars of Saudi donations coming in to the Clinton Foundation? These are exactly the kind of conflicts that ethical standards are designed to prevent.

1.3 ANOTHER E-MAIL TURNS UP MISSING

“Guccifer uncovered something else in his hack that could not be verified until the last of the e-mails were released by the State Department last week. In addition to the four full e-mails he released, he also leaked a screenshot of Sidney Blumenthal’s AOL inbox. If we cross reference this screenshot with the Blumenthal e-mails in the State Department release, we can see that the e-mail with the subject “H: Libya security latest. Sid” is missing from the State Department e-mails.

“The fact that it is missing suggests one of two possibilities:

1-The State Department does have a copy of this e-mail but deemed it top secret and too sensitive to release, even in redacted form. This would indicate that Sidney Blumenthal was sending highly classified information from his AOL account to Secretary Clinton’s private e-mail server

2- The State Department does not have a copy, and this e-mail was deleted by both Clinton and Blumenthal before turning over their subpoenaed e-mails to investigators, which would be considered destruction of evidence and lying to federal officials.

In either of these scenarios, Clinton and her close associates are in violation of federal law.  ..  In the least generous interpretation of these facts, Sidney Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton conspired to cover up an ally of the United States funding the assassination of one of our diplomats in Libya.

1.4 WHY A GRAND JURY IS LIKELY ALREADY CONVENED

After the final e-mails were released by the State Department on February 29th, it has been reported in the last week that:

• Clinton’s IT staff member who managed the e-mail server, Bryan Pagliano, has been given immunity by a federal judge which suggests that he will be giving testimony to a grand jury about evidence that relates to this investigation and implicates himself in a crime. Until now, Pagliano has been pleading the fifth and refusing to cooperate with the investigation.
•  
• The hacker Guccifer (Marcel Lazar Lehel) just had an 18-month temporary extradition order to the United States granted by a Romanian court, despite being indicted by the US back in 2014. Is Guccifer being extradited now in order to testify to the grand jury that the screen grab with the missing e-mail is real?
•  
• Attorney General Loretta Lynch was interviewed by Bret Baier and she would not answer whether or not a grand jury has been convened in this case. If there was no grand jury she could have said so, but if a grand jury is meeting to discuss evidence she would not legally be allowed to comment on it.

1.5 [ CONCLUSION]  ..subtitle added

This scandal has the potential to completely derail the Clinton campaign in the general election.

If Hillary Clinton really cares about the future of this country and the Democratic party, she will step down now while there is still time to nominate another candidate. .. It’s time for us to ask Secretary Clinton to tell us the truth and do the right thing. If the United States government is really preparing a case against Hillary Clinton, we can’t wait until it’s too late.

----

Source MISSING CLINTON E-MAIL CLAIMS SAUDIS FINANCED BENGHAZI ATTACKS. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-09/missing-clinton-e-mail-claims-saudis-financed-benghazi-attacks.

----

----

1.6  IS IT LATE?... I don’t think so. She was warned about the effects of mocking on Federal Law. Accordint to experts on the matter Hillary have committed the following crimes and  SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY INDICTED FOR : 

1.  Obstruction of justice.  If any average citizen lied to investigative officials, failed to turn over evidence, provided only selective evidence,  they would be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  If any average military personnel with even the lightest of Security Clearance was in breach as Clinton clearly was, they would be prosecuted.  Why are our officials not held accountable for their actions?

2.  Spoliation of evidence.  If any average citizen wiped the hard drive after requests from authorities to turn it over, they would be prosecuted.  Why are our officials not held accountable for their actions?

3.  Violation of Federal Records Act  Our officials agree to be accountable when they hold office.  They also agree to comply with the Federal Records Act.  Why are our officials not held accountable for their actions?

4.  Violation of Espionage Act  Our officials with Security Clearances agree to hold sensitive information vital to our country’s security with strict restrictions.  Ignoring these restrictions should be prosecuted in full, and not doing so is treason against every American.  Why are our officials not held accountable for their actions?

1.7  IN ADDITION,

THERE ARE SEVERAL ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE INVESTIGATED:

a- The Clinton Foundation ties to weapons deals should also be thoroughly investigated.

Read this: CASH FLOWED TO CLINTON FOUNDATION AMID RUSSIAN URANIUM DEAL  By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIRE  APRIL 23, 2015 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

b- Hillary is implicated in the scandal of panama papers. According to Jake Anderson, April 7-16 :   THE PANAMA PAPERS COULD REALLY END HILLARY CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-07/yes-panama-papers-could-really-end-hillary-clintons-campaign

 

c- The gold stolen from the State of Libya has not been investigated. It deserves special attention 

d- The complicity with Hillary inside State Dept shoul also be investigated: State Department Office Removed Benghazi Files After Congressional ...  http://freebeacon.com/issues/state-department-office-removed-benghazi-files-congressional-subpoena/   The Washington Free Beacon. Apr 21, 2016 - State Department officials removed files from the secretary's office ... Benghazi-related documents and communications from 10 of Hillary 

e- The complicity of Pres Obama in supporting this crook leader should also be investigated: A report from Eric Zuesse published in July 5-16 suggested that President Obama proposed the nullifying of 6 criminal Laws, some of them to protect Hillary Clinton if indicted.  

Read this: IN CLINTON CASE, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION NULLIFIES 6 CRIMINAL LAWS  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-05/clinton-case-obama-administration-nullifies-6-criminal-laws

 

When the Obama Administration, on July 5th, ruled that in regard to Hillary Clinton’s privatized email system while she was Secretary of State, "Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case” to a grand jury, because “We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges,” they ignored the following six U.S. criminal laws, each of which undeniably describes very well what she did:

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

18 U.S. Code § 1512 — Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

18 U.S. Code § 1519 — Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

18 U.S. Code § 2071 — Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

18 U.S. Code § 641 — Public money, property or records

18 U.S. Code § 793 — Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information …

If we are a nation “of laws, not of men” (as that old basic description of democracy phrased it), then Ms. Clinton will be prosecuted, at least through the grand jury stage, on (at least) those grounds

----

=== 

THE REACTION TO E-MAIL SCANDAL WAS INMEDIATE

#1- In APRIL 16 JUDGE JEANINE PIRRO GOES NUCLEAR ON HILLARY: "The American People Have To Stop Her". 

 “If the establishment is not willing to admit that no one is above the law and is not willing to garner justice, then ordinary Americans need to make sure the scales of justice are level for all of us...This is not about politics. It's about you, your family, and this great nation. It’s about preventing people who have no regard for the law, or you, for that matter, from running this country.”.

“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if the establishment, including law enforcement, does not stop her – you have to,” Judge Jeanine Pirro said in her opening statement on Justice.

----

----

#2- In APRIL 27 Fox reported: Judge Andrew Napolitano has said time and time again that there is ‘overwhelming’ evidence to both indict and convict Clinton.  “The evidence is overwhelming to conclude so, overwhelming to anyone that observed what she did,” he said.  Open:  http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/we-fact-checked-trumps-claim-that-virtually-every-single-legal-expert-say-clinton-committed-a-crime/

---

 

JUDGE NAPOLITANO  in June 28-16 said she lied to the FBI : JUDGE NAPOLITANO: BENGHAZI REPORT REVEALS HILLARY'S 'CAPACITY FOR ...  http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/06/28/judge-napolitano-what-benghazi-report-reveals-about-hillary-clinton.. 2 days ago - The final report of the House Select Committee on Benghazi reveals that Hillary Clinton knowingly lied that the 2012 terror attack was sparked by an anti-Muslim video,

----

----

 #3-FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL MUKASEY wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal back in January, claiming the charges were justified.


Similar statement was said  by  LT. GEN. MICHAEL FLYNN, the retired chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency, he told CNN‘s Jake Tapper that it was time for Clinton to drop out of the race back in February, long before the current surge in support for Sanders.

“If it were me, I would have been out the door and probably in jail… This over-classification excuse is not an excuse. If it’s classified, it’s classified.”

----
----

#4- Former Asst. U.S. District Attorney Andrew McCarthy also believes she may have committed a crime he wrote in The New York Times:

These attempts to suggest she was unaware of any wrongdoing are likely unavailing. .. The laws against mishandling classified information are prosecution-friendly. For example, it is a felony for one entrusted with classified information not only to communicate it to a person unauthorized to have it, but also to enable its removal from its secure storage facility through gross negligence. It is also a crime to fail to report that information’s improper removal or communication. So is retaining materials containing classified information at an unauthorized location… Secretary Clinton systematically conducted official business on a private unsecure system, and had subordinates do likewise, knowing the nature of their duties made classified communications inevitable.

….

Info found #s 2-3-4 in THE FBI CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO CLINTON’S EMAIL SERVER: IT’S TIME FOR HILLARY TO CONCEDE TO BERNIE SANDERS.   By Diana Price, June 24, 2016
----
----

#5 Without the support of billionaires like Soros,  Hillary couldn’t laugh easily on the FBI. Here his recommendations to her uncovered by wikileaks:  Hillary Clinton email archive is an email with the subject ‘Unrest in Albania,’ in which Soros makes clear to Clinton that “two things need to be done urgently.” He then directs the Secretary of State to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.” Revealing the influence he wields within the corridors of power, Soros then provides Secretary of State Clinton with three names from which to choose. Unsurprisingly, Clinton acquiesced and chose one of the officials recommended by Soros — Miroslav Lajcak.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/wikileaks-email-soros-clintons-master/#VKVZ1CuGqkVhy4FL.99

----

----

#6 NBC-NEWS in May 25 said  Clinton Broke Federal Rules With Email Server, Audit Finds - NBC News. This News was replied by LEVIN in www.hot.air.com with the article LEVIN: HILLARY DIDN'T BREAK EMAIL RULES, SHE BROKE FEDERAL LAW - HOT AIR ...   

OPEN : http://hotair.com/archives/2016/05/26/levin-hillary-didnt-break-email-rules-she-broke-federal-law/

 

Mark Levin in his Radio talk Show made it clear: 

“You’ve heard by now, Hillary Clinton violated email rules. What? There’s email rules? That’s how Politico headlined their breaking story. ‘State Dept watchdog: Clinton violated email rules.’ NO. She didn’t violate email rules, she violated federal law.

‘The State Department Inspector General concluded that HC didn’t comply with the agency’s policy on records.’ Guilty. GUILTY!  She’s guilty of violating a federal law. It’s not just the State Department that comes up with these policies. These policies are put in place to undergird THE FEDERAL RECORDS ACT.”

In fact, Washington Free Beacon reported last year that Clinton signed an NDA at the start of her time at the State Department acknowledging the very laws she is now clearly in violation of.

For those of you keeping score at home, the FEDERAL RECORDS ACT lays it out pretty clearly: (18 U.S. Code § 2071)

 

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

That is the federal law in question. It covers all federal agencies. Each individual agency (The Department of State, in this case) then implements rules and policies for all employees so that their operations are in accordance with the law. The rules have been violated, therefore the law was broken.

----

----

#7  3 FEDERAL LAWS HILLARY MAY HAVE VIOLATED BY USING PERSONAL EMAIL ...  http://ijr.com/2015/03/264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret-email-accounts/

Here are the three most frequently cited laws that appear to have been violated by Clinton:

1. Mishandling Classified Information

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:

"'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,' Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.

'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.'”

This past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.

2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act

Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:

“Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.”

According to the original story on Clinton's emails published in The New York Times:

"Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.

In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department."

The fact that the State Department combs through the 55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton's private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.

3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)

Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:

“'At this point in time, I think we're the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,' Arends said of his group's Benghazi-related request.”

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move, specifically designed to circumvent FOIA:

“'Hillary Clinton’s system was designed to defy Freedom of Information Act requests, which is designed to defy the law.'”

----

IN FACT, an FBI  report from March 21 confirmed that Hillary Clinton broke US Laws.  Report: FBI 'Increasingly Certain' Hillary Clinton Broke Laws ...  OPEN:  http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/report-fbi-increasingly-certain-hillary-clinton-broke-laws-regarding-classified-emails

The NY Post –same day- asserts that FBI chief James Comey and his team of investigators are "increasingly certain that presidential nominee Hillary Clinton violated laws in handling classified government information through her private email server." 

----

----

At that time –March, April, June- America was hit with most severe storm from the e-mail scandal.  Then after came the silence imposed by Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General appointed by Barack Obama .. If Trump comes to power, both can be indicted for obstruction of justice, besides the fraud alleged in the case of Obama.. plus his drones and other war crimes.  Their days are counted... and now the FBI has decide to finish his incomplete courageous job. Of course Hillary will try to divide and destroy current State Security apparatus to get the Presidency.. confirming Lispet warning "a crook party can destroy the legitimacy of a entire State-Nation system". Is either jail or the Presidency to her. What about the FBI? .. they have nothing to lose. There are very honest people there.. James Comey prove it. 

I hope James Comey has the support of the whole Institution. Meanwhile the whole NATION is listening the message from Judge Jeanine Pirro : the one who broke the LAW   

“Hillary Clinton cannot be President of the United States, and if the establishment, including law enforcement, does not stop her – you THE NATION have to,”   

NOBODY SHOULD BE ABOVE THE LAW IN AMERICA!