NE0-NAZI FORCES WANT TO SUPPRESS
THE UN-SC
Introduction by Hugo Adan .
May 21-16
Neo nazi-fascist-style of partnership is emerging again, like
in the mid of the 1930’ world recession. In fact, they are controlling Govts in
Ukraine & advancing to other States in Europe. Well defined, neo-nazism is
now the alliance of big private Corp with political parties, plus armed groups like ISIS- Al Qaeda, supported
by established governments in the ME
& officials in the US & EU. When Big business
Corp join forces with political leaders of disoriented masses who favor war,
genocide & nuke-devastation is because we are in front of the re-emergence
of neo-nazi-fascism. These are the forces who claim now the suppression of
International Laws and the wipe out of the UN-Security Council. This is the
worst Geo-political issue of our time. And this is also the reason why we have
to prevent the arrival of Mrs. Clinton and D Trump to the FED power in the US. The
art below supports such neo-nazi ideology with the pretext of defending the
freedom of press. My comment at the end
of this article.
....
----
Submitted by Tyler Durden on
05/20/2016
(By
Brandon Smith), [ Here only extracts. ]
The United Nations Security
Council wants a global “framework” for censoring
the Internet, as well as for using government propaganda to “counter”
what its apparatchiks call “online propaganda,” “hateful ideologies,” and
“digital terrorism.” To that end, the UN Security Council this week ordered
the UN “Counter-Terrorism Committee” — yes, that is a real bureaucracy — to draw
up a plan by next year. From the Obama administration to the brutal
Communist Chinese regime, everybody agreed that it was time for a UN-led
crackdown on freedom of speech and thought online — all under the guise
of fighting the
transparently bogus terror war.
The UN, ridiculed by American
critics as the “dictators club,” will reportedly be partnering
with some of the world's largest Internet and technology companies in the plot.
Among the firms involved in the scheme is Microsoft, which, in a speech
before the Security Council on May 11, called for “public-private partnerships” between Big Business and Big Government to
battle online propaganda. As this magazine has documented, Google,
Microsoft, Yahoo, and other top tech giants have all
publicly embraced the UN and its agenda for humanity. Many of the
more than 70 speakers also said it was past time to censor the Internet, with
help from the “private sector.”
At the UN meeting this week, the 15 members of the UN
Security Council, including some of
the most extreme and violent dictatorships on the planet, claimed they wanted
to stop extremism and violence from spreading on the Internet. In particular,
the governments pretended as if the effort was aimed at
Islamist terror groups such as ISIS and al-Qaeda,
both of which have received crucial backing from leading members of the UN
Security Council itself. Terrorism was not defined. Everybody
agreed, though, that terror should not be associated with any particular
religion, nationality, ethnicity, and so on, even though at least one delegation fingered the Israeli government.
[Conclusion ]
Aside from governments, dictators, and international
bureaucrats, Big Technology was also represented at the UN meeting. Microsoft
Vice-President and Deputy General Counsel Steve Crown told the
assembled representatives of governments and tyrants that there was no “silver
bullet” to prevent terrorists and extremists from using the Internet. “If there
were an elegant solution, industry would have adopted it,” he claimed, adding
that Google, Facebook, and Twitter were coming together to prevent the Internet
from being abused. Facebook was
exposed just this week censoring conservative media outlets from its
“trending” news section. And earlier this year, Google was exposed for having helping the U.S. government foment
jihadist-led revolution in Syria.
Echoing the UN's
rhetoric, Crown claimed “international law” and fascist-style “public-private partnerships,” in which governments and Big
Business join forces, were the appropriate response. He also said
the “international community,” a deceptive term generally used to refer to the
UN and its member governments, needed to “work together in a coordinated and
transparent way.” The UN Security Council agreed, saying in its final
declaration that there needed to be “more effective ways for governments to
partner with ... private sector industry partners.” It is hardly a new agenda.
As The New
American reported previously, the technology giants — all
of which are regularly represented at the globalist Bilderberg summits —
have also
emerged as enthusiastic supporters of the UN's radical “Agenda 2030.” According
to the agreement, the goal is “transforming our world,” redistributing
wealth at the international level, empowering the institutions of global
governance, and more. Among the mega-corporations proudly backing
the scheme are the world’s top three search engines: Google, Microsoft’s Bing,
and Yahoo. It was not immediately clear whether those corporations’ support
for the deeply controversial UN agenda would affect the supposed impartiality
of their search results. But critics of the UN plan expressed alarm
nonetheless.
Of course, a handful of the more than 70 people who spoke
at the Security Council confab paid lip service to freedom of speech and
freedom of thought. The Iraqi
government's delegation, for example, emphasized differentiating between
“freedom of thought and extremist ideologies.” Others said the war on extremism
could not be used to justify persecuting critics of governments. Some of the
speakers no doubt had good intentions, too.
[ Notice.. the rulers of the
world don’t want the UN mess their profitable “arms” business. ]
However, putting the UN in charge
of fighting extremism and dangerous ideologies would be like putting a mafia
boss in charge of fighting crime — it is patently absurd, even
grotesque. Most of the UN's member regimes are undemocratic, to be generous, and many
of them are led by genocidal psychopaths who murder with impunity. Among
other UN member states, those enslaving North Korea, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Sudan,
China, [[ NOT US? nor RU? .. estrange
“missing” coincidence!! ]] and many more are run by criminals and mass-murderers
who epitomize terrorism and violent extremism. Plus, virtually every terror
group on earth today has its roots in state-sponsorship,
including ISIS and
al-Qaeda.
The real solution to
terror, then, is neither a stronger UN nor a global war on ideologies, extreme
or otherwise. Empowering the UN to wage a global war on ideas,
ideologies, propaganda, and speech is itself an extremist proposition riddled
with extreme
dangers. A far simpler answer to the scourge of terrorism would be
to defund the UN, arrest
those supporting terror groups, and stop
propping up dictators and terrorists
with taxpayer money. Anything else is a
dangerous fraud.
….
....
My comment:
1- It was the fascit-nazi regimen of
Germany & Italy who reject the idea of a supra-national institutions like the current UN-SC, the institution that
is trying to put order in the world and to avoid escalation of international
wars. Today we have again neo-nazi-fascist forces and ideologies similar to those we have it at the beginning
of the century with Bush Jr. This is the case of Mr Trump and Mrs Clinton +Mrs
Nulan intending to get total power in the US & the UN. Behind them there
are big US Corp that want to suppress the current UN-SC.
Certainly the UN
institution lose effectiveness since the arrival of Bush Jr. to power, they
lose control of the world order, several branches of the UN were blocked, captured
and controlled by big corp of super-states, and the US-NATO allies. The UN manages
to reestablish its autonomy with the fall of the GOP in the US. But again those
neo-nazi forces try to rescue power with the alliance of Mrs Clinton and Mr.
Trump to assault power in the US via electoral fraud (closed primaries, massive
suppression of voters & exclusion of the 3rd option in Public TV
debates) .
This is the most “dangerous fraud” of our time. They
already captured FED institutions in the US (that explain Mrs Clinton impunity
on Libya mails) . In fact, they are ruling the US behind the scene with the complicity of the Corp
press and via Lobbyist writing Laws. To see them in action OPEN This is How
Corrupt Our Political System Is a Must Watch 6 Minute
Video.
How to empower the UN-SC and to de-power the big corporation
& NATO alliance? , that is the main Geo-political problem of our time!. In the US we have only one option: to support Bernie Sanders & Jill Stain to the Presidency and VP. This is the FRONT that can beat the neocons & neo-nazis coming to power, if Bernie split form the Dems party after the primary California. Then the Nation will have their option against the oligarchical 1%. If neocons / neo-nazis murder or try to kill Sanders, they will unleash a huge chaos of in-predictable consequences.
2- It was those
fascist-nazi regimes who took power during the world economic recession (mid 1930’s)
who really manage to control & suppress the free Press (& today internet) to
cover up their narrow interests, those of “state-private
partnerships,” -in Germany & Italy yesterday-
just to impose their regimen governments in alliance with Big Business Corp
at that time (right definition of nazi-fascism). Today we are watching again
the emergency of two extreme forces : neo-nazi-fascism regimes in Ukraine plus
other states of Europe, and the ISIS terrorism in the Middle East, both of them
supported by big corp from the US & West Europe. These are the forces that
want to wipe-out the UN-SC and international Laws.
3- The issue "freedom of press" -really in the hands of big Corporations today- is only the excuse, not the main issue in this article. That the "corporate press" has to be reformed .. of course is a pending task. The Corp Press is now promoting the electoral fraud of Hillary Clinton in the US and is clearly being paid also by Trump -not only to undermine democracy- but also PEACE at world level. This issue deserve serious attention, not to be used as pretext to cover up the re-emergence of neo-fascism worldwide.
3- The issue "freedom of press" -really in the hands of big Corporations today- is only the excuse, not the main issue in this article. That the "corporate press" has to be reformed .. of course is a pending task. The Corp Press is now promoting the electoral fraud of Hillary Clinton in the US and is clearly being paid also by Trump -not only to undermine democracy- but also PEACE at world level. This issue deserve serious attention, not to be used as pretext to cover up the re-emergence of neo-fascism worldwide.
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario