IMAGINANDO
EL MUNDO POST NEOLIBERAL
Introduccion
Por Hugo Adan, Enero 16, 2015
La actual economía
neo-liberal no beneficia a nadie, solo a la minoría que acumula super-ganancias
y agrava la explosiva desigualdad social a nivel interno e internacional. Eso
es insostenible y hay signos de que los pueblos y naciones oprimidas apuntan a
romper este modelo, mientras se camina hacia
una nueva depresión mundial.
El
neo-liberalismo lo impone un imperio que dispone de tres instrumentos para su
dominio mundial:
a-
el poder nuclear y militar con el que chantajean o imponen guerras de saqueo a nivel
mundial, y mediante fraudes especulativos y la corrupción del capital buitre
(vulture capital que especula con la deuda soberana de estados anexados al
sistema imperial) .
b-
la fabricación de dólares sin respaldo alguno (lo fue
el petróleo y ya no lo es) lo que le permite controlar la banca mundial y el
intercambio internacional. Eso también es insostenible hoy y esta llegando a su
final.
c-
el control de la prensa mundial con la que aun pueden distorsionar y mentir de forma deshonesta y agresiva
al mundo entero. Pero la rev tecnológica en la comunicación ya no es monopolio
de ellos y la verdad se impone quiéranlo o no.
El art que
viene es prueba de ello. Se dice aquí que solo nos queda respirar el fracaso de
nuestros planificadores. De forma que si los de abajo mueren o son asesinados (caso
Ferguson) por falta de ese aire llamado libertad y democracia, los del medio -el/los
articulistas de abajo- también sienten lo mismo. Pero se limitan a acusar a los burócratas
del Gbno central, cuando no son solo ellos –su práctica o su dinámica- la causa
del problema. Es todo el sistema (su estructura económico-política e ideológica)
lo que hay que cambiar.
Aquí les
brindo extractos de su 1er articulo y su breve nota sobre la 2da parte. El
autor nos impide continuar leyéndo la 2da parte al exigir que lo subscribamos. Si vale la
pena hacerlo, eso lo decide Ud. Yo
prefiero leer los articulos de David DeGraw, autor de The Economics of Revolution.
You can read Part 1 here and Part 2 here y a otros que abajo indico.
De todos modos, leer a Martenson y Charles Hugh Smith es interesante pues nos da una idea
de como piensan los yuppies de America, las capas medias ilustradas, en pleno
proceso de desenganche frente a las elites de poder.
----
WHY OUR CENTRAL PLANNERS ARE BREEDING FAILURE. Posted on January 15, 2015 by Chris
Martenson . How can success
breed failure? It turns out there are a number of dynamics at work.
1- Survivorship Bias. Survivorship
Bias is the natural tendency to look at the survivors for the keys to success
rather than to examine those who didn’t survive, many of which disappear
without a trace.
2- Drawing Over-Arching
Conclusions from Single Examples. CHINA
case. commentators attribute China’s
great developmental success to its command economy. The conventional conclusion
that the major central banks—the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, the
European Central Bank and the Bank of China—succeeded in saving the global
economy from depression in 2008-09 is another example of drawing over-arching
conclusions about success from single examples. Other said that the major
central banks—the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank
and the Bank of China—succeeded in saving the global economy from depression in
2008-09 is another example of drawing over-arching conclusions about success
from single examples. However, there are no opportunities to test the
assumption that the central bank recipe used in 2008-09 can be applied with
equal success in future financial crises in these very different economies.
3- Previous
Policies Have Changed Conditions. what worked in 2008-09 may not succeed in
the next financial crisis because those policies only worked in the specific
set of conditions of that crisis. If the conditions have changed, then the
strategies that were ‘successful’ in the previous set of conditions will not
yield the same outcome.
4- Are
the Outcomes of Monetary Policies Truly Predictable? The current set of fiscal and monetary
policies pursued by central banks and states are all based on lessons drawn
from the Great Depression of the 1930s. Are the present-day conditions
identical to those of the Great Depression? If not, then how can anyone
conclude that the lessons drawn from that era will be valid in an entirely
different set of conditions?.
5- The
Seeds of Failure Are Sown in the Initial Flush of Success. If this is the
case—and the slowing global “recovery” suggests this is indeed so—then the
success of these extreme policies is illusory, and the truly key determinants
of success and failure remain elusive.
In Part 2: The 6 Reasons The Next Economic Rescue Will Fail . Click
here to access Part 2 of this report.
====
The 6 Reasons The Next
Economic Rescue Will Fail. Why the current unstable 'recovery' must topple.
by Charles Hugh Smith. Thursday,
January 15, 2015. http://www.peakprosperity.com/insider/91254/6-reasons-next-economic-rescue-will-fail
Executive Summary
- The 6 Factors
- Rising inequality
- Reversion to the mean
- Cost overages
- Diminishing returns
- Misleading measurement
- Expertise mismatch
- Why the 'success' of the Federal Reserve and other world central banks is ultimately dooming them to failure
In Part 1, we
examined a variety of reasons why the apparent success of Keynesian monetary
and fiscal policy may be transitional and brief rather than permanent.
Here in Part 2, we delve into the six other dynamics that
make success destabilizing.
Rising Inequality—Perceived and Real
The
highly touted “recovery” has been highly uneven in its distribution. The
benefits of rising income and wealth have flowed disproportionately to the top
5%, 1% and even 1/10th of
1%. Those who didn't make it onto the limited-seating Recovery Bus feel
the gap between the prospects and wealth of the top tier and their own wealth
and prospects widening. Indeed, psychological studies find that we assess our
wealth and social position not by our actual material prosperity, but by the
narrowing or widening of the perceived wealth gap with our peers.
This is
precisely the situation in the U.S. and China. Both economies are supposedly
expanding smartly, but the gains are concentrated in a relative few hands; the
Rising Prosperity Bus has few seats. The vast majority perceive
themselves as being left behind, and that is highly...
[Aquí el autor
pide que subscribamos su web para seguir leyéndolo. Hagalo Ud si cree que vale
la pena hacerlo. Yo no pago para leer a nadie ni cobro a los que me leen. Solo
recomiendo que lean a David DeGraw. The Economics of
Revolution. You can read Part 1 here and Part 2 here. O lean a Michael Hudson, a
Richard Wolff y Michael Snyder sobre este tema]
----
RELATED
CONTENT . Notice that
none of the above authors have been mentioned. So, sided..
- When Short-Term Thinking Slams Into Long-Term Predicaments. Guess which side trumps the other?
- Off The Cuff: Today's Low Oil Price Is A Massive Head-Fake. And will ultimately cause the price to rise MUCH higher
- Why No One Should Want This To Devolve Further. This kind of conflict has no victors, only losers
- Stay Focused. There's suddenly a lot in motion right now
- Off the Cuff: The Longer Reality Is Denied, The Bigger The Inevitable Crash. Economics meets Physics
- The Destruction That Awaits The ponzi elements of the shale story start to implode
- Off the Cuff: More Fed-Induced Froth. Don't worry stock market, Janet's got your back
- Who Will Dominate This Century?. Which country(ies) are best positioned to exert themselves?
- Deflation Is Still Winning! OK, folks: this is it
- Oil Armageddon Arrives It's beginning to look at lot like 2008 all over again
------
====
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario