domingo, 15 de abril de 2018

WW3 IS AD PORTAS.

WW3 IS AD PORTAS. 

Hugo Adan  April 15 2018


Claiming that there is no alternative to US-led strikes on Syria at a time as specialists from the UN Organization on Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) arrive in Damascus, is hypocrisy, the Russian Embassy in the UK said in a statement.

"When international monitors are arriving in Damascus, and – more broadly – when the Syrian government and large parts of the opposition are moving towards creating a constitutional committee to end the war, to say that 'there is no practicable alternative to the use of force if lives are to be saved' IS HYPOCRITICAL, TO SAY THE LEAST," the embassy said in a statement.

"Let’s leave legal details to lawyers. But one doesn’t need deep expertise to see that we are dealing with an attack under a false pretext, a false legal basis and a false result," the embassy adds.

May said that the UK joined the attack on Syria out of "national interest."

"Let me be absolutely clear: we have acted because it is in our national interest to do so. It is in our national interest to prevent the further use of chemical weapons in Syria — and to uphold and defend the global consensus that these weapons should not be used. For we cannot allow the use of chemical weapons to become normalized — either within Syria, on the streets of the UK or elsewhere," May said.
"We have done it because we believed it was the right thing to do. And we are not alone. There is broad based international support for the action we have taken. Over the weekend I have spoken to a range of world leaders — including Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Gentiloni, Prime Minister Trudeau, Prime Minister Turnbull and European Council President Donald Tusk. All have expressed their support for the actions that Britain, France and America have taken," the prime minister declared.
---
IN MY VIEW:
FACT 1: is in the battle field that any war-issue is defined. In Syria there are two main actors: Invaders vs Syrians plus neighbors .
Among INVADERS are: 1- the US troops,  and , 2- the  independent groups of jihadist or “terrorists” ,  named  ‘militants’  by the West.
Among the SYRIANS are: 1-   the regular forces of Assad’ army, and 2- independent armed groups from Syria and neighbor countries  that are fed up with invaders.

FACT 2: The difference is that US barely control all jihadists, they may control the mercenaries funded & trained by the US, but not all of them. The rich jihadist have oil business of their own and between them there are huge rivalries (they use to kill themselves).

Which sector of the jihadist used chemical weapons? : Most likely the mercenaries controlled by the US.. not the independent sector of jihadists, now in the run out of Syria. But, nobody knows with certainty which group did it recently.. if any Chemical attack happens.  Most likely it didn’t happen and the US used this allegation to prevent it will be used against US troops inside.. in the near future. It is clear that not all jihadist trust the US .. there was a feeling of betrayal from the US among those who run out, said a reporter. .  It is also clear that Assad did not use chemical weapons.. no point in doing so since  both sections of jihadist suffered big defeats from Asad army.

The rich sector of jihadist surrender to Assad, they got pardon and went back to Lybia, Afghanistan… The US  may have tried  to put them together with the demand against the uses of chemical weapons,  but the tactic came late and it is now a hollow-false-flag.. since the most probable jihadist user of Chemical weapons were the mercenaries  controlled by the US and Saudis. This info have been described by several independent Arab journalists.

If any uses of chemical weapons continue it will be considered CIA operative  against Assad army.

FACT 3 : Assad vctory is irreversible.. REGIME CHANGE HAS NOT FUTURE in Syria. If happens, could be the result of WW3,  if the improbable occur: that RU-China are defeated.  So far, the US expected civilian rebellion against Assad, don’t  have chances of success. All that Assad needs  now  to consolidate its victory is to take out the US army from Syria and PEACE will come to Syria. The US has not chances of winning the war in Syria. They can be defeated little by little, but to defeat them fast & initiate the reconstruction..Syria  need the active support of the world for PEACE in the middle East.. plus the sending of troops from RU-China inside Syria (of course invited by Assad). .  

FACT 4: If the US-NATO hit Syria again, Syrians will need the military support of RU and China plus the world support from all civilian brigades against US companies, embassies and military stations of the US, UK and Israel in the world. The MOV for PEACE in the Middle East is now on. So it will be easy to move forward as happens during the Viet Nam war. That is the only way to stop WW3.

FACT 5:  Israel try to hit Syria with their air-force (killed more than 20 civilians), they stopped when they knew that RU planned to hit all European NATO basis. The US-UK-FR did it too. The big planned hit on Syria to deposed Assad ended  in a military parade of 15’ disguised  with the blah-blah “mission accomplished” by Trump. . The US-NATO allies will be unable to send  more troops inside. If manage to do so.. Iran will be the 1st sending their army too. If US allies continue bombing .. RU will wipe out NATO in Europe and Iran  will hit Dimona in Israel.

 FACT 6: In short: peace in the Middle East depends on the defeat of the US army stationed inside Syria. They won’t get the support of destroyes, missiles and planes  used in the 1st round of bombing . RU made it clear that they will hit them and immediately will hit all basis of NATO in Europe.

FACT 7: This will  be the hot (part 1) of the cold war. Meaning: it will be the real start of WW3 .. the war  that NATO allies are pushing in Syria. For RU & China is a matter of survival to hit NATO in Europe.. IF the US don’t pact PEACE and the dismantle of Nukes.. NUKES will come to US too. All this may happen before July.
In Brief:  WW3 is ad portas.  
----

----

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario