APR
15 18 SIT EC y POL
ND denounce Global-neoliberal debacle y propone State-Social
+ Capit-compet in Econ
US n GEO-POL NEWS
SPUTNIK and RT SHOWS
MACRON PARROTING US-UK
RELATED:
[[
As Political observer of the issue Syria with a Geo-Pol perspective, I
would say that Macron is jeopardizing the existence of Paris and his
Nation if continue promoting WW3.
Macron is promoting WW3 with allegations that has not been
confirmed yet by the proper authority (the story that Saddam
used Ch bombs on his nation). Macron is
parroting what UK warmongers are saying.. UK is already out of Europe and Trump
will be happy if Europa goes down.
Macron know that Chemical weapons have been used by US (militants) UK in
Syria and by FR in ex-colonies.. their effect is nothing compared to WW3 nukes, those the US used in Hiroshima and Nagazaki, this time
nuke effects has to be multiplied by thousand. Why Macron is
following US-UK on this matter?
The US know that MAD (Mutual Ass-Destr) is a path to suicide
and even if neocons push Trump to go the 1st
strike.. the majority inside the “deep
state” will prefer to remove Trump from power.
Trump’ necons warmongering is already damaging the unity of
the US: CAL already announced secession from the FED
and is coming two more States. Promoting WW3 -as Macron does- only create instability at the level of economics
& Geo-pol.
RU & Chi have shown to the world that they are in favor
of PEACE, but under the limits of a red line (full
respect to Internat Laws and total respect to the sovereignty of Syria). US-UK have
to remove their soldiers and militants from Syria.. If the US doesn’t do it they
will be killed –perhaps not even for ASSAD soldiers- but by civilian brigades that
ASAD can’t control (there are many
brigades that hate the US banner in their land, and much more civilians that hate the Saudis
terrorists supported by US.
Soon the armed brigades in Syria they will start killing US
soldiers and the US will respond with another set of bombs, that will be the
start of WW3.
RU-China will
respond; there are many reasons for that: the west
encircle their borders with nukes and impose severe economic sanctions on
them. So, this will be a nice time to
wipe-out NATO bases from Europe.
Remember: US-NATO
allies can’t control the world mongers of Israel.
Beside, several EU allies disagree with war-mongers in US. What Macron does is
accelerate of EU unity disintegration. Italy already get out from US-UK war
plans.
So, wanted o not.. Macron will be seen as one of the causes
of WW3.
Is easy to see the response of RU (whose World Coup event is been sabotaged) to a new set of
US-UK-FR bombing .. they will simply wipe-out key military sites from NAO in Europe .. if
the US attempt to help them, the US will also be hit massively, up to
surrender.
This is what the inept Macron is fostering:
the path to WW3.
If this happens,, bye bye Paris, London and Tel Aviv .. in
the first round of WW3. ]]
----
----
WW3 IS AD PORTAS.
Hugo Adan April 15 2018
Claiming that there is no alternative to US-led strikes on Syria at a time as specialists from the UN Organization on
Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) arrive in
Damascus, is hypocrisy, the Russian Embassy in the UK said in a
statement.
"When international monitors are arriving
in Damascus, and – more broadly – when the Syrian government and large parts of the
opposition are moving towards creating a constitutional committee
to end the war, to say that 'there is no practicable alternative
to the use of force if lives are to be saved' IS
HYPOCRITICAL, TO SAY THE LEAST," the embassy
said in a statement.
"Let’s leave legal details
to lawyers. But one doesn’t need deep expertise to see that we are dealing
with an attack under a false pretext, a false legal basis and a false
result," the embassy adds.
May said that the UK joined the attack on Syria
out of "national interest."
"Let
me be absolutely clear: we have acted because it is
in our national interest to do so. It is in our national
interest to prevent the further use of chemical weapons
in Syria — and to uphold and defend the global consensus that
these weapons should not be used. For we cannot allow the use of chemical
weapons to become normalized — either within Syria, on the
streets of the UK or elsewhere," May said.
"We
have done it because we believed it was the right thing to do. And we are
not alone. There is broad based international support for the action we
have taken. Over the weekend I have spoken to a range of world
leaders — including Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Gentiloni,
Prime Minister Trudeau, Prime Minister Turnbull and European Council President
Donald Tusk. All have expressed their support
for the actions that Britain, France and America have taken," the
prime minister declared.
…
---
IN MY VIEW:
FACT 1: is in the battle field that
any war-issue is defined. In Syria there are two main actors: Invaders vs
Syrians plus neighbors .
Among INVADERS
are: 1- the US troops, and , 2- the independent groups of jihadist or “terrorists”
, named ‘militants’ by the West.
Among the SYRIANS
are: 1- the regular forces of Assad’ army, and 2- independent armed groups from Syria and neighbor
countries that are fed up with invaders.
FACT 2: The difference is that US barely control all
jihadists, they may control the mercenaries funded
& trained by the US, but not all of them. The rich jihadist have oil
business of their own and between them there are huge rivalries (they use to
kill themselves).
Which sector of the jihadist used chemical weapons? : Most likely the mercenaries controlled by the US.. not the
independent sector of jihadists, now in the run out of Syria. But, nobody
knows with certainty which group did it recently.. if any Chemical attack
happens. Most likely it didn’t happen
and the US used this allegation to prevent it will be used against US troops
inside.. in the near future. It is clear that not all
jihadist trust the US .. there was a feeling of betrayal from the US among
those who run out, said a reporter. . It
is also clear that Assad did not use chemical weapons.. no point in doing so
since both sections of jihadist suffered
big defeats from Asad army.
The rich sector of jihadist surrender to Assad, they got
pardon and went back to Lybia, Afghanistan… The US may have tried to put them together with the demand against
the uses of chemical weapons, but the
tactic came late and it is now a hollow-false-flag.. since the most probable
jihadist user of Chemical weapons were the mercenaries controlled by the US and Saudis. This info
have been described by several independent Arab journalists.
If any uses of chemical weapons continue it will be considered
CIA operative against Assad army.
FACT 3 : Assad vctory is irreversible.. REGIME CHANGE HAS
NOT FUTURE in Syria. If happens, could be the result of
WW3, if the improbable occur: that
RU-China are defeated. So far, the US
expected civilian rebellion against Assad, don’t have chances of success. All that Assad needs now to
consolidate its victory is to take out the US army from Syria and PEACE will
come to Syria. The US has not chances of winning the war in Syria. They
can be defeated little by little, but to defeat them fast & initiate the
reconstruction..Syria need the active support
of the world for PEACE in the middle East.. plus the sending of troops from
RU-China inside Syria (of course invited by Assad).
.
FACT 4: If the US-NATO hit Syria again, Syrians will need
the military support of RU and China plus the world support from all civilian
brigades against US companies, embassies and military stations of the US, UK
and Israel in the world. The MOV for PEACE in the
Middle East is now on. So it will be easy to move forward as happens during the
Viet Nam war. That is the only way to stop WW3.
FACT 5: Israel try to
hit Syria with their air-force (killed more than 20 civilians), they stopped
when they knew that RU planned to hit all European NATO basis. The US-UK-FR did
it too. The big planned hit on Syria to deposed Assad
ended in a military parade of 15’ disguised with the blah-blah “mission accomplished” by
Trump. . The US-NATO allies will be unable to send more troops inside. If manage to do so.. Iran
will be the 1st sending their army too. If US allies continue
bombing .. RU will wipe out NATO in Europe and Iran will hit Dimona in Israel.
FACT 6: In short: peace in the Middle East depends on the defeat of the US
army stationed inside Syria. They won’t get the support of destroyes, missiles
and planes used in the 1st
round of bombing . RU made it clear that they will hit them and immediately
will hit all basis of NATO in Europe.
FACT 7: This will be
the hot (part 1) of the cold war. Meaning: it will be the real start of WW3 .. the war that NATO allies are pushing in Syria. For
RU & China is a matter of survival to hit NATO in Europe.. IF the US don’t pact PEACE and the dismantle of Nukes..
NUKES will come to US too. All this may happen before July.
In Brief: WW3 is ad
portas.
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
RT SHOWS
----
----
----
----
NOTICIAS IN SPANISH
Latino America looking for alternatives to neoliberalism to
break with Empire:
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE
Deep on the US political crisis, their internal conflicts n
chances of WW3
How On Earth the Killing MORE People Rescue
Syria? By Peter Hitchens - Continue
----
Trump’s Compassion for Syrians Stops at U.S.
Shores By Editorial Boar Continue
----
Trump Attacks Syria By
HELENE COOPER, et al Continue
----
----
----
Is It RU Surrender that Is on the Agenda or
World War 3? By Paul Craig Roberts
Continue
----
----
----
ZERO HEDGE ECONOMICS
Neoliberal globalization is over. Financiers know it, they
documented with graphics
"At the top of the cycle, this
is going to push real yields higher (Figure 9). Especially with reduced flows
from the EA and Japan. But there is a
massive problem. The market knows this and holds a massive duration short"
- Citi
See Chart:
….
----
----
"We basically have a bad money system...a free market based on honest
money would never produce this kind of imbalance...The house of cards is so shaky and so fragile right now that there is
the risk of the proverbial black swan event."
----
----
As any rollercoaster ride goes, fasten your seat belt and keep all arms and
legs in the vehicle. With the first three months of 2018 behind us, it
is clear that this year will be very
different from the last...
1 – Trade Wars Flashpoints, From China to Canada and Mexico
2 – Geopolitical Flashpoints
3 – Stock Buybacks Flashpoints
4 – Washington Political Risk Flashpoints
As any rollercoaster ride goes, fasten your seat belt and keep all arms and
legs in the vehicle.
With the first three months of 2018 behind us, it is
clear that this year will be very
different from the last.
…
----
----
"Whenever one invokes the words 'late-cycle' or 'end of the
cycle', the natural response is to want to sell everything, especially since
memories of the 2008-09 or 2000-02 corrections are still vivid."
See Chart:
What Morgan Stanley, and specifically its chief equity
strategist Michael Wilson, wanted to do, is show the
S&P in real terms, i.e., the nominal value divided by the price of gold, to
get to an inflation adjusted number. The result was the following:
See Chart:
…
----
----
The
last time geopolitical risk was this high, the world was on the verge of
nuclear war.
See Chart:
…
----
----
"Two important forces are
disrupting how investors view the Information Technology sector: Regulation and re-classification..."
See Chart:
…
SOURCE: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-15/goldman-here-are-two-more-reasons-dump-tech-stocks
----
----
As the April 17 deadline for filing
income tax returns and paying federal income taxes approaches, it is important
that we all remind ourselves of an important point: Income taxation and the Internal Revenue Service are irreconcilable with
the principles of a free society.
----
----
"...the Russians and Chinese and a host of other
countries are sick and tired of being told they have to use dollars for
trade when doing so helps fund the U.S. that is outright hostile to those nations and seeks their overthrow."
----
----
After Washington unleashed more
missile on Syria, and amid the chaotic responses from the world's pro- and
anti-Assad nations, 'investors' must assume "Mission Accomplished"
means it's all over...
----
----
US POLITICS
Seudo democ y sist
duopolico in US is obsolete; it’s
full of frauds & corruption. Urge cambiarlo
The Sanctions, announced by UN
ambassador Nikki Haley, "will go directly to any sort of companies that
were dealing with equipment related to Assad and chemical weapons use."
----
----
Some 4,000
US troops began major wargames in Jordan today, just hours after neighbouring
Syria was bombarded by more than 100 missiles launched by America, Britain and
France.
----
----
"The Obama Administration bears the principal
responsibility for Syria and Libya but not for Iraq and Afghanistan or
the succession of failures elsewhere. Timid intervention did not work for the
former; full-scale intervention did not work for the latter..."
----
----
"...we’re not out of the woods yet.
For now, we can let out a breath but this isn’t over. The neocons will push for Trump to fire Mattis next. If that
happens, duck..."
----
----
WORLD ISSUES and M-East
Global depression is on…China, RU, Iran search for State
socialis+K- compet. D rest in limbo
"...the U.S. and its global power position will be so dramatically
altered in the years ahead, it’ll be almost unrecognizable by 2025, as a result
of both economic decline and major geopolitical mistakes."
----
----
If there was any confusion on whose
side of the Syrian conflict China finds itself, that confusion is now gone.
----
----
"In
other words, if you live in Britain, France or America, you now know just how cheaply the leaders of your country hold your life,
and the lives of your fellow countrymen. "
----
----
"You take the red pill... and
I show you how deep the rabbit hole
goes."
----
----
PRESS TV
Global situation described by Iranian observers..
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
===
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario