3rd OPTION PARTY A NEW REALITY IN 2016 ELECTION

3^rd OPTION PARTY A NEW REALITY IN 2016 ELECTION

Hugo Adan . Jan 24, 2016

According to corporate media reports, former New York City mayor and billionaire Michael Bloomberg is considering a third-party to run for president if race comes down to Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders and Republican frontrunner Donald Trump. The corporate media hide a Fact that Bloomberg already bit both parties (Dems & Reps) when he won the 3^rd term as mayor of NY, the biggest electorate in America. So, he don’t need to wait until the final game be between Sanders and Trump.

Clinton was upset with the idea of being taking out of the race, either legally (FBI) or democratically (defeated by Sanders inside the Dem party); she reacted like Trump when she was not mentioned as possible option for the final game, she is terrified with the idea of Bloomberg getting inside the electoral context .

The key question now is who will win or lose with a third OPTION party?. The mere fact of Bloomberg getting inside the context is forcing Sanders to consider getting out from the Dems party and create the Peoples Front as 3^rd option too. The possibility of Trump to unite the GOP salad is impossible, even if he manage to do it, more than 20% of such electorate won’t vote Trump, according the recent polls. Defeating the GOP will be peace of cake for Bloomberg.

He knows them and has experience. He won the Mayor nomination of NY as GOP in 2001 & 2005. He dropped his Republican Party affiliation on June 19, 2007, and won his 3^rd term mayor nomination as independent.  Besides, this divorced billionaire (17 bll worth) has been mentioned as independent candidate for Presidential elections since 2008 and he has the money to do it.

If he run for President now, the whole electoral picture will change. Imaginer a Front “Majors for Peace” at national level & Bloomberg picking up the best for every party (including the left)..  he will simply win the context in one click. 

People is fed up with both parties (dems & reps) and IT IS A FACT that today an INDEPENDENT 3^RD OPCION is more real than ever for 20116 elections ..specially because the bipartisan system is under fire for corruption (the buying elections with clandestine “super-packs”). So today right question is:

How the political panorama will be changed with 2 independent candidates running as 3^rd option:

A-the Bernie Sanders PEOPLES FRONT with Rand Paul as partner.. and 

B-the billonarie Bloomberg  with another Front, to say: The  FRONT “Majors for Peace”.

In my opinion the billionaire Bloomberg can win easily NY, the biggest electorate in the US, at the expenses of the dirty bipartisan couple. But he cannot win easily the rest of the national electorate (unless he launch the FRONT of mayors) .

If the principles of proportionality and decentralization is respected & agreed between A & B then the immediate loser will be Hillary. She will be dumped democratically, saving the inefficient FBI from the task of cleaning the political environment.

Then the fight between A & B will be the fight between the Nation vs. the 1%.  Even if this fight is win by Bloomberg, the strategic winner will be the Peoples Front in 2020. For Bloomberg to launch a new round of neoliberal expansion has not space at world level, not with the debacle of the dollar (the IMF new currency is at portas) and with the emergence of a multi-lateral system with RU-China in it. And not even with the vulture capital or big mafias from bankers & crooks from Wall Street ready to devour Bloomberg.

In the immediate electoral context there will be two issues for debate: either peace or corruption, negotiable between A & B. The billionaire can talk more freely than Sanders on cutting budget for the military or reducing the production of guns in agreements with RU-China . Or could happens the reverse, in this case the issue corruption. Corruption will be a more sensitive issue for Bloomberg. 

WHO IS MORE IMMUNE TO THE FIRE CORRUPTION.. SANDERS OR BLOOMBERG?. Considering the FACT that:  when Bloomberg ran for a third term in 2009 as an independent, he spend a record-breaking sum—the equivalent of $174.53 per vote (more than ten times his competitor) according to New York Daily News , November 27, 2009. (http://www.conservapedia.com/Michael_Bloomberg  [note-2] ), how much Bloomberg is planning to invest now to win the national context?. Whatever he invest, the issue corruption will burn him.

If that is the case, the logical winner on this debate will be THE PEOPLES FRONT lead by Sanders-Paul, .. Their PEOPLES FRONT have the advantage of departing from Unions already existing .. but they will be a winner  if & only if.. they manage to set up the PEOPLES FRONT.

On other issues, the Bloomberg front (to say MAYORS FOR PEACE) will have the advantage of departing from LOCAL municipalities, from the bottom- up.. AND  since ”nada crece de arriba para abajo” .. Bloomberg will be today winner  ..  if & only if ..he manage to set up a MAYORS FRONT or something like that. If this happens, the strategic winner continue being the PEOPLE FRONT and the real loser : the bipartisan dirty couple.

====