DIFAMATIONS TO BEN CARSON in ICH
THE COMPENDIUM OF IMBECILITIES from MIKE LOFGREN
Source: GOP and the Rise of Anti-Knowledge.
By Mike Lofgren
..
His Ad Hominem statement on Ben Carson:
“The man is anti-knowledge incarnated, a walking compendium of every
imbecility ever uttered during the last three decades. Obamacare is 1- worse
than chattel slavery. 2-Women who have abortions are
like slave owners. 3-If Jews had firearms they
could have stopped the Holocaust (author’s note: they obtained at least some weapons
during the Warsaw Ghetto rising, and no, it didn’t). 4-Victims of a mass
shooting in Oregon enabled
their own deaths by their behavior. And so on, ad nauseam”
Let’s check these distortion one by one:
1-Ben Carson, a
rising star in conservative circles, on Friday compared President Obama's
health-care law to slavery said “It was never about
health care; it was about control." (Sarah Parnass/The Washington
Post).
Carson original
words were: "And it is slavery in a way,
because it is making all of us subservient to the government, and it was never
about health care. It was about control."
Another lie: “Carson,
a pediatric neurosurgeon who
was recently hired to be a contributor at Fox News . That is false: Carson
was never hired by Fox, the most
conservative media of GOP.
2- “Carson: Women Who Have Abortions Are Like
Slaveowners” is a misleading title written by Ryan Koronowki http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/10/25/3715892/carson-abortion-slavery/ .
..
Here is said that the issue abortion came after host Chuck Todd
asked if life began at conception, to which Carson answered “I believe it does.”
Todd asked whose right should be superseded — the mother or the child. “In the ideal situation, the mother should not believe that the baby is her enemy, and
should not be looking to terminate her baby,” Carson said. “Things are
set up in such a way that the person in the world who has the greatest interest
in protecting her baby is the mother.”. Meaning:
when rape happens & the mother do not want to have it, she should not
killed it with abortion.. the Law will protect the newborn. There are
institutions that will take care of the baby.
Todd asked what happens if someone has an unwanted
pregnancy — should they have a right to terminate it? “No. Think about this.
During slavery — and I know that’s one of those words you’re not supposed to
say, but I’m saying it. During slavery, a lot of the slave owners thought that
they had the right to do whatever they wanted to that slave. Anything that they
chose to do. And, you know, what if the abolitionists had said “I don’t believe in slavery, I think it’s wrong, but you guys
do whatever you want to do.” Where would we be?”
In 2013, Carson compared
the Affordable Care Act to slavery, saying it was the worst thing that happened
to America since slavery, adding “it is slavery, in a
way.” [Means: state dependency ]
“Slavery was a brutal system that trapped millions and
millions of people in bondage for over 200 years. Obamacare is a law that
Congress passed which has helped 17.6
million people get health insurance through the private insurance market
and existing government health care programs.”
Todd then asked about an interview
with Yahoo! News’ Jon Ward wherein Carson would not say whether he wanted to
see Roe v. Wade overturned. “I favor life.
That’s what I favor,” Carson said
..
So, he does “believe in life”
and “understand that a baby in the uterus is a human
being and is protected by the Constitution.”. Asked whether that would
contained exceptions, Carson said “I’m a reasonable person, and if people can come up with a
reasonable explanation of why they would like to kill a baby, I’ll listen.”.
but that if that “rare situation occurred “I believe
there’s room to discuss that.” He said he “would
not be in favor of killing a baby” that came about because of rape or incest.
He pointed to the “many stories” of people who have led “useful lives” after
being born as a result of rape or incest. http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/10/25/3715892/carson-abortion-slavery/
..
Chuck Todd asked Carson about his sometimes inflammatory
rhetoric, such as about the Holocaust and
guns and his accusation that Obama is a psychopath.
“As people get to know me, they
know that I’m not a hateful, pathological person like some people try to make
me out to be,” he said.
...
3-On the issue Holocaust . The note come from “Ben Carson Blames Holocaust On Gun Control” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ben-carson-holocaust-gun-control_5616a7aee4b0082030a185c2
The original title should’ve said “He blamed the Holocaust on Nazi gun control in an interview
on CNN Thursday.”
In Carson's book, A More
Perfect Union, Carson writes: “German citizens were disarmed
by their government in the late 1930s, and by the mid-1940s Hitler's regime had
mercilessly slaughtered six million Jews and numerous others whom they
considered inferior ... Through a combination of removing guns and
disseminating deceitful propaganda, the Nazis were able to carry out their evil
intentions with relatively little resistance.”
"I think the likelihood of
Hitler being able to accomplish his goals would have been greatly diminished if
the people had been armed," Carson elaborated in the interview.
"There's a reason these dictatorial people take the guns first."
----
[Why his statements are considered wrong & by whom? Why..Not because is true, but because a neo-nazi jew lobby “The
Anti-Defamation League”prohibit to relate nazi-policies
with the neo-nazi followers. Who
are they? The
ones that support the genocide and land expropriation of Lalestine. Why
this is an issue in the US? Because Obama is trying to
disarm all americans to protect the mafias from Wall Street and bankers
associated with them. ]
----
4-Regarding the shooting in Oregon enabled
their own deaths by their behavior. The original article was: “Ben Carson on Oregon Shooting: "I Would Not Just Stand There and Let Him Shoot Me" By Miles E. Johnson |
Tue Oct. 6. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/10/ben-carson-oregon-shooting
Here Ben Carson says he would have led an effort to stop the shooter who killed
13 people last week in Roseburg, Oregon, had he been there during the attack. If
the shooter ask you: What is your religion?.. "Not
only would I probably not cooperate with him, I would not just stand there and
let him shoot me," Carson responded. "I would say, 'Hey guys, everybody attack
him. He may shoot me, but he can't get us all.”
5- These diatribes are typical
among ultra conservative religious groups. They went further in their
defamation to Ben Carson. They accuse
him of being a killer for doing research with other MD on a fetal tissue at 17
weeks.. The Fact is that Carson didn’t kill a death fetus, What they did was
research and the dogmatic religious
people didn’t talk about the science benefit of this research : fetal tissue plays a vital role in
medical research.
..
For example it is being used to develop a vaccine
against Ebola. Many researchers depend on fetal tissue to understand and
hopefully develop treatment for a myriad of conditions from blindness to HIV.
..
Without fetal tissue neurosciences research, something
essential for the development of neurosurgical techniques, would be far less
developed. SEE “Ben Carson did research
on 17 week fetal tissue” Posted by Dr. Jen Gunter ⋅
Ag12, 2015 https://drjengunter.wordpress.com/2015/08/12/ben-carson-did-research-on-17-week-fetal-tissue/
----
Who was the accuser on those MD : an undergraduate
student who wrote “Ben Carson Was
Confronted With His History As A Fetal Tissue Researcher. His Explanation Makes
No Sense”. Her name Tara
Culp-Ressler Aug 13, 2015
[Esta
Taradita trabaja or worked at several “progressive religious “ nonprofits,
including Faith in Public Life.]
Increible: Los conservadores acusando de su dogma a un real
progresista: Ben Carson. Esto solo en la America del GOP .. donde la calumnia
is a matter of faith !
----
IN
SHORT: no les
basto con decir que Ben Carson es un conservador cuando en realidad es uno de
los mas radicales liberal dentro del partido Republicano. Las distorciones del Filósofo
creador del refrito “practical epistemology” son realmente canallescas. Yo me
pregunto si algun community college esta otorgando grados de PhD donde se circula
ese falso paragima filosófico .. Donde obtuvo Mike Lofgreen su PhD? Lo cierto
es que no existe la llamada “practical epistemology” y la sarta de sandeces que
dice en este art si es un “compendium of imbecilities ever uttered during the
last three days”. Lo grave es que se
publique eso en una revista de izquierda: en ICH, cuya reputación es “de alta
calidad” http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43287.htm
====
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario