“FRIENDLY CRITIQUE TO HILLARY CLINTON”
found in:
COUNTER PUNCH.org
“Collusion between
the Clinton campaign and the DNC allowed Hillary Clinton to buy the loyalty of
33 state Democratic parties last summer. Montana was one of those states. It
sold itself for $64,100. ..
“The Super Delegates
are now defying democracy with their insistent refusal to change their votes to
Sanders in spite of a handful of overwhelming Clinton primary losses in
their own states, were arguably part of that deal.
“In August 2015, at
the Democratic Party convention in Minneapolis, 33 democratic state parties
made deals with the Hillary Clinton campaign and a joint fundraising entity
called The Hillary Victory Fund. The deal allowed many of her core billionaire
and inner circle individual donors to run the maximum amounts of money allowed
through those state parties to the Hillary Victory Fund in New York and the DNC
in Washington.
“She took advantage
of the Supreme Court ruling 2014, McCutcheon v FEC, that knocked down a cap on
aggregate limits as to how much a donor could give to a federal campaign in a
year. It thus eliminated the ceiling on amounts spent by a single donor to a
presidential candidate. .. In other words, a single donor, by giving 10,000
dollars a year to each signatory state could legally give an extra $330,000 a
year for two years to the Hillary Victory Fund.
“The fund is
administered by treasurer Elizabeth Jones, the Clinton Campaign’s chief
operating officer. Ms. Jones has the exclusive right to decide when transfers
of money to and from the Hillary Victory Fund would be made to the state
parties. ..”
===
----
..
These are not
softballs, and are likely to be deemed “unfriendly” by the Clinton campaign;
they are nonetheless fair and pertinent.
..
Why do young voters
in general prefer Sen. Sanders?
Why do young woman
voters prefer Bernie Sanders?
Why do independents
prefer Sanders?
Why do the polls show
you losing support nationally among Latinos?
Why did Sanders win a
majority of young voters of color in Wisconsin?
Why do voters
consider Sen. Sanders more honest than you?
How has Bernie
Sanders been able to raise more money than you in recent months?
How come Sanders’
campaign contributors are more numerous than yours, and give smaller
contributions?
How has Sanders been
such a successful fundraiser given his rejection of Super PAC money?
Would your campaign
be competitive if it weren’t for the contributions of a small number of rich
people?
Why did you bristle
when asked by a young Greenpeace activist about financial support from fossil
fuel lobbyists?
Why did you recently
criticize Bernie Sanders’ plan for free public college as a giveaway to “Donald
Trump’s kids” when the children of the rich generally go to private
universities?
Why do many of the
polls show Sanders doing better against Trump and Cruz than you?
Do you regret your
support for the Panama Free Trade Agreement while Secretary of State given its
failure to reign in massive tax dodging and money laundering?
Why is your campaign
getting nastier with Sen. Sanders, for example asking whether he’s “qualified”
to be President?
[ Is it because you already bought
election? .. Who is then the non-qualified? ]
----
----
Manuel García, Jr. WHY THE VOTE
FOR HILLARY?
..
“The system, of Big
Business controlling and ownership of the U.S. Government, ensures Big Money’s
freedom to continue stealing “democracy” from the public by:
– manipulating the
national economy (evading regulatory oversight and taxes, getting “too big to
fail” public bailouts for gambling losses),
– grossly exploiting
workers (domestic and foreign),
– violating Earth’s
climate and environment (with extractive industries and chemical-GMO
agri-monocultures),
– And subverting
foreign governments and launching wars (to “open markets”).
..
[ And now .. buying elections.]
..
“Financial advantage is the only “logically justifiable reason”
to vote for Hillary Clinton, and also the only
essentially criminal one :
(“Behind every great fortune is a great
crime” – Balzac).
Most of Hillary’s
voters do not have more than the financial wherewithal to justify their support.
In that logic, there is only emotional choice.”
..
..
[ Not ethical principles, not clear purpose, not commitment .. Hillary
can used those votes as toilet paper again. ..
..
Get real my dear, you owe
nothing to Hillary.
It is time to put
down the plutocrats that are financing her.
Cronyism is over in America. We don’t want
more frauds, corruption and wars.
Say NO to the 1% of rich people.
..
SAY
NO TO HILLARY CLINTON!! ]
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario