jueves, 19 de noviembre de 2015

STOP SUPPORTING TERRORISTS



STOP SUPPORTING TERRORISTS

Commented by Hugo Adan. [ in brackets ]. NOV 19-20 15


THE 9 WAYS TO STOP TERRORISM :  [ #1 GOT WRONG TITLE ..it was corrected accord to content ]

I. Stop supporting terrorists. Indeed, the U.S. and its allies are directly responsible for creating and supplying ISIS.  As an internal Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document produced recently shows, the U.S. knew that the actions of “the West, Gulf countries and Turkey” in Syria might create a terrorist group like ISIS and an Islamic CALIPHATE. A former head of the DIA explained: “It was a willful decision [by America] to … support an insurgency that had salafists, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood ….” If we want to stop terrorism, we need to stop supporting the terrorists.
..
 
II. Stop Supporting the Dictators Who Fund Terrorists. Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest sponsor of radical Islamic terrorists.  The Saudis have backed ISIS and many other brutal terrorist groups. And the most pro-ISIS tweets  allegedly come from Saudi Arabia. Besides, the 9/11 Commissioner and the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry Into 9/11, the Saudi government backed the 9/11 hijackers (see section VII for details). Saudi Arabia is the hotbed of the most radical Muslim terrorists in the world: the Salafis (both ISIS and Al Qaeda are Salafis). Furthermore, U.S. and NATO-supported Turkey is also massively supporting ISIS, provided chemical weapons used in the jihadi’s massacre of civilians, and has been bombing ISIS’ main on-the-ground enemy – Kurdish soldiers – using its air force.
..
 
III. Stop Bombing and Invading when a Negotiated Settlement Is Offered. It happens when the U.S. rejected offers by Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria to surrender … and instead proceeded to wage war. [It happens again when RU offered a Negotiated Settlement (not arms to Assad if US-NATO stop arming ISIS, plus enticing Asad to calling elections once ISIS is out of Syria) according to Sputnik & RT ]. Only “negotiating peaceful deals will drain the swamp of terrorists created by war and invasion.”
..
 
IV. Stop Imperial Conquests for Arab Oil. The U.S. has undertaken regime change against Arab leaders we don’t like for six decades. We overthrew the leader of  Syria in 1949, Iran in 1953, Iraq twice, Afghanistan twice, Turkey, Libya … and other oil-rich countries. .. Top American politicians admit that the Iraq war was about oil, not stopping terrorism (documents from Britain show the same thing). Much of the war on terror is really a fight for natural gas. Or to force the last few hold-outs into dollars and private central banking. .. Top American politicians admit that the Iraq war was about oil, not stopping terrorism (documents from Britain show the same thing). Much of the war on terror is really a fight for natural gas. Or to force the last few hold-outs into dollars and private central bankingTop American politicians admit that the Iraq war was about oil, not stopping terrorism (documents from Britain show the same thing). Much of the war on terror is really a fight for natural gas. Or to force the last few hold-outs into dollars and private central banking. .. And the U.S. military described terror attacks on the U.S. as asmall price to pay for being a superpower“. If we want to stop terrorism, we have to stop overthrowing Arab leaders and invading Arab countries to grab their oil.
..
 
V. Stop Drone Assassinations of Innocent Civilians. Top CIA officers say that drone strikes increase terrorism (and see this). If we want to stop creating new terrorists, we have to stop the drone strikes.
.. 
 
VI. Stop Torture. Top terrorism and interrogation experts agree that torture creates more terrorists. Indeed, the leaders of ISIS were motivated by U.S. torture. Example: Charlie Hebdo-murdering Frenchterrorist Cherif Kouchi told a court in 2005 that he wasn’t radical until he learned about U.S. torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. .. If we want to stop creating new terrorists, we have to stop torturing … permanently.
.. 
 
VII. Stop Mass Surveillance. Top security experts agree that mass surveillance makes us MORE vulnerable to terrorists. .. Indeed, even the NSA admits that it's collecting too MUCH information to stop terror attacks… [and it didn’t pay off ]. So, Stop it.
.. 
 
VIII. Stop Covering Up 9/11. Government officials agree that 9/11 was state-sponsored terrorism … they just disagree on which state was responsible. Many high-level American officialsincluding military leaders, intelligence officials and 9/11 commissionersare dissatisfied with the 9/11 investigations to date. .. The Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee (Bob Graham) said that the Paris terror attack, ISIS, and other terrorist developments are a result of failing to stand up to Saudi Arabia and declassify the 9/11 investigation’s report about Saudi involvement in 9/11: VIDEO URL https://youtu.be/V4eNKp-5bQA . .. The 9/11 chairs, Ron Paul, and numerous other American politicians have called for declassification, as well. Again, OTHERS HAVE different ideas about who was behind 9/11 
..
[ “The others” include the following hypothesis: that 9/11 was an inside job coordinated with intelligence agencies from Pakistan, Israel and Saudis –the Saudis  provide most of the jihadist team. Besides, in addition to plane crashes, Physicists alleged implosion, case in point: the tower 4 that was not hit by planes. Furthermore, Info was released about money took out from one of the tower days before 9/11. Finally, Info exist on a plane full of Saudis getting out the US, even when rules set did not allowed. NOT investigation was done on these concerns. The inside job Facts, were purposely ignored. The official 9/11 report was flawed. ]
..
 
IX.  Stop Doing It Ourselves.  [ In other words: we are the terrorists ]. The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom said:By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.” (audio here). .. The Washington Post reported in 2010: “The United States has long been an exporter of terrorism, according to a secret CIA analysis released Wednesday by the Web site WikiLeaks. .. Wikipedia notes: “Chomsky and Herman observed that terror was concentrated in the U.S. sphere of influence in the Third World, and documented terror carried out by U.S. client states in Latin America. They observed that of ten Latin American countries that had death squads, all were U.S. client states. .. They concluded that the global rise in state terror was a result of U.S. foreign policy. .. In 1991 a book edited by Alexander L. George [the Graham H. Stuart Professor of Political Science Emeritus at Stanford University] also argued that other Western powers sponsored terror in Third World countries. It concluded that the U.S. and its allies were the main supporters of terrorism throughout the world. .. Indeed, the U.S. has created death squads in Latin America, Iraq and Syria. .. Some in the American military have intentionally tried to “out-terrorize the terrorists”. As Truthout notes: ..the plan to plan to “out-terrorize the terrorists,” emerged from  the interview from [Scott] Horton to Stieber:  “the philosophy was that if each time one of these roadside bombs went off and  you don’t know who set it … the way we were told to respond was to open fire on anyone in the area, with the philosophy that that would intimidate them, to be proactive in stopping people from making these bombs …”..
..
 
SUMMING UP:  Terrorism is defined as: “The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce [a civilian population], especially for political purposes. .. So Stieber is correct: this constitutes terrorism by American forces in Iraq.  And American officials have admitted that the U.S. has engaged in numerous false flag attacks. .. Indeed, many top experts – including government officials – say that America is the largest sponsor of terror in the world … largely through the work of the CIA. And see this.
.. 
 
[X ] Stop Throwing Bodies In the River. We must stop doing the 9 things above which increase terrorism. We have to stop “throwing new bodies in the river.” … But the powers-that-be don’t want to change course … For example, the military-complex grows rich through war … so endless war is a feature – not a bug of our foreign policy. .. Torture was about building a false justification for war. .. Mass surveillance is about economic and diplomatic advantage and crushing dissent. .. Supporting the most radical Muslim leaders is about oil and power … “a small price to pay” to try to dominate the world. … 
.. 
A leading advisor to the U.S. military – the Rand Corporation – released a study in 2008 called “How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering al Qa’ida“. The report confirms what experts have been saying for years: the war on terror is actually weakening national security (see this, this and this). … As a press release about the study states:  Terrorists should be perceived and described as criminals, not holy warriors,  [and much less  moderate-terrorists” as happens today in Syria. ] and our analysis suggests that there is no battlefield solution to terrorism, said Rand.”
..  

[“No battlefield solution to terrorism”?. Here Rand Corp is partially right .. we invaded Iraq and  Afghanistan, after bombing them.. we failed miserably. .. Russian took that experience, they did not invade Syria, they instead armed Assad for a battlefield solution to terrorism and Russia is right again, bombing is not the solution, is only the support for a battleground.  HOWEVER, if US-NATO send troops over there -at this point in time-they won’t be welcome .. they will get crossfire from every side, even from the jihadists because of the official press-trap they created.  So, the only option for US-NATO is to support Putin strategy.. much better if we get out from Syria. If US-NATO  try to destroy Putin strategy.. that will be considered a US-Nato blackmail on Russia (a threat with nuclear attack) and, in fact, it will be a war declaration to RU.. Then, the space focus of the war will be shifted, 1st to whole ME region & then to major sites in Europe & the West. In other words, RU won’t abandon their strategy.. they will instead prepare and be ready for the next challenge .. to RU, Syria strategy is a matter of life, as it is the US-NATO blackmail. Who has the right cause in these wars? that is the key question to solve. .. Unfortunally .. we do not have it.] 
---- 
Source:
 
====

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario