According to the document, the coalition
will comprise Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,
Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. http://en.ria.ru/world/20140912/192860055/10-Arab-States-to-Join-US-headed-Coalition-Against-IS.html [What they have in
common: they hate Syria regime and Iran secularism, and most of them are sunis.
Do you need more probe that US war against ISIS is either a false-flag or a charade!
]
2-
MOSCOW, September 11 (RIA Novosti) - The Senate Judiciary
Committee voted unanimously on Thursday in favor of the Justice For Sponsors of
Terrorism Act (JASTA) which would allow the victims of the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks, and possible future attacks, the right to sue foreign states
believed responsible for damages. The Act will affect ongoing attempts by
families of 9/11
victims to sue the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for sponsoring members of Al
Qaeda who committed the 2001 terrorist attacks. In 2009, the Obama Department of Justice upheld Saudi Arabia"s
immunity from the lawsuit under the FSA Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSA). An appeals court decision in 2013 challenged that
decision, allowing the case to move forward. A Congressional action would
guarantee the families" lawsuit could finally move through the courts. [La
ley del amor entre gitanos permite sacarse dinero entre ellos, pero jamás sacarse
la suerte. Este es el amor que hoy
existe entre los Saudis y Obama, el que les vendió aviones de guerra]
3-
On September 11, 2001, the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda launched a
series of coordinated terrorist attacks upon the United States. Terrorists
hijacked four passenger planes; two of them were crashed into the North and
South towers of the World Trade Center complex in New York City. A third plane
was flown into the Pentagon, while a fourth airliner was targeted at
Washington, D.C. but crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. In total, almost
3,000 people died in the attacks. The United States responded to the 9/11
attacks by launching the War on Terror and invading Afghanistan to depose the
Taliban, which had harbored al-Qaeda. [Two years later under the same
counter-terrorist program Iraq was bombed and invaded]. Bradley Moss told RIA Novosti Thursday:
"Possibly
one of the least understood concepts underlying the Global War on Terrorism was
that engaging in mere 'whack a mole' campaigns was not enough," Moss said,
adding that eradicating terrorism requires developing stable governing institutions
and prosperous societies in the parts of the world that help breed terrorists.
MY COMMENT:
Just mellifluous
words, coward ones to hide the truth. He forgot to say that what we need
is a planned economy that prevent explosive inequality, and indict fraudulent speculation.
We need to impose the Tobin tax to any financial transaction
in order to help regions, states, nationalities and communities lagging behind
in terms of development. We need a new inclusive democracy in which all
nationalities or their parties have a voice and decision making power on
anything that affects their life. We need a democracy
in which a 3rd choice is mandatory and the right to
self-determination and autonomy is respected. We need a democracy in
which referendums are permanently called to decide on national issues if the 2/3 of
votes in the Senate are not reached. A democracy in which any elected official can be removed , including
the President via impeachment, if an
independent investigated committee from the Supreme Court consider that this
official had breached the Law.]
Thirteen years after the tragic events of September 11,
2001, many experts say that neither the United States nor the world are safer
than it was back then, despite government efforts. Why ?
because of neo-liberal rules imposed by force since 1985 with the Washington
consensus creates explosive inequalities.
4-
Much geopolitical comments commit the mistake of believing that foreign
affairs should be understood in terms of national interests. The crisis in
Ukraine, for instance, can be viewed as being over gas pipelines or spheres of
influence. In reality, however, the decisive factor in foreign policy is very
often the personal self-interest of the decision-makers themselves, and by
extension the institutional self-interest of the bodies in which they work. Take
last week's Joint Statement of the NATO-Ukraine commission issued at
the summit in Wales. It would be difficult to imagine a more belligerent or
aggressive document on Russia. http://en.ria.ru/authors/20140910/192807316/NATO-US-Governed-By-Self-Interest-Not-National-Interest-.html
Comment:
In my
opinion , this attitude is based on the wrong assumption: that politics consist
in crushing its opponents by force and diplomacy consist in blackmailing the
opponent with the uses of military might, the nuked missiles. A fact prevailed: It is not the national interest, nor the
self-interest of rulers the only factors to be considered in foreign affairs, it is the whole community
of states and the international community that is destabilized if national disagreements
are escalated toward open wars.
Germany is a case in point:
Germany is a case in point:
The US & Merkel imposed economic sanction on Russia and
support Kiev aggression on the South based on the idea that NATO will crush
Russia and dissolve their dependency of oil and gas for winter. Merkel ambivalence
was so stupid that make her whole nation be dependent on a worse threat: NATO. There
was no legal nor ethical principles in such position: she supported the attack
on democracy in Kiev by the neo-nazis in close coordination with the oligarchy
lead by Poroshenko. Now she got that she deserved, is about to be dismissed from power.
What a fiasco her rule was, what a shame for Germany. I guess, Obama is transferring to her his medal on
peace, he don't used, he don't need it. What a grotesque piece of theater. We laugh on
her inherited nazi “nationalism”, laughable!. RIP Merkel!!
5-
Regarding terrorism in the US, this is the most serious news. Please don't laugh!
5-
Regarding terrorism in the US, this is the most serious news. Please don't laugh!
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/11/2014 - 20:57
this cause a real PANIC.
Governments and mainstream media outlets have a great way of
presenting sensational threats and evil villains. They want us to be terrified
of men in caves, roving bands of barbarians, and deadly viruses that turn our
insides out. Last night, for example, President Obama told the world that ISIL
poses the most significant threat to global security. (Ironically al-Qaida
no longer seems to be a threat, and ISIL, which no one had heard of until a few
months ago, is now public enemy #1. It just goes to show how shallow and
reactionary the security theater is...) But here’s the truth: If
you live in the Land of the Free, you’re far more likely to get ‘accidentally’
shot by a police officer than blown up by a terrorist.
6- The last one is just a warning in the right time
Russia Warns Obama's
"Two-Faced" Strategy In Syria Will Lead To "Huge Escalation In
Middle East & Africa"
Zerohedge.com Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/11/2014 - 23:00
If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Clearly comprehending that Obama's new strategy against ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline through (as was the impetus behind the 2013 intervention push), Russia is pushing back noting that the it is using ISIS as a pretext for bombing Syrian government forces and warning that "such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa."
Zerohedge.com Submitted by Tyler Durden on 09/11/2014 - 23:00
If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Clearly comprehending that Obama's new strategy against ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline through (as was the impetus behind the 2013 intervention push), Russia is pushing back noting that the it is using ISIS as a pretext for bombing Syrian government forces and warning that "such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa."
======
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario