GHOST BUSTERS DEBUNKED 2 NEW US-FRANKKESTEIN: KHORASAN &
KARDASHIAN
The later monsters were
more idiotic than the 1st : Story-tells just for idiots.
The new US invention
serves the purpose of putting down the Assad’s Regime in Syria
Hugo Adan, Sept 25, 2014
Read how these stories has been debunked; this is funny but
serious at the same time.
---------
1-
New Boogeyman Has Already
Been Debunked Obama is now – after the fact – scrambling to justify bombing the sovereign
nation of Syria without the permission of either the Syrian government or even
the United States Congress by saying that we were going
after the super-evil Khorasans, who were about to attack us.
My God! That sounds terrifying … like a cross
between Genghis Khan, Klingons and the Kardashians!
The U.S. is saying that
they’re even more
dangerous than ISIS. Kardashians was just media manipulation of fear, a type of war monguerism to capture mind & consent of American's Senate. OPEN: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/31/kim-kardashian-butts-into-syria-s-online-civil-war-with-savekessab-campaign.html .
There’s
just one wee little problem … the Khorasan threat is as as fake as the Kardashians’
physiques. (Admittedly, it’s confusing, given that the Kardashians have also inserted themselves right
in the middle of the Syrian conflict.)
The U.S. media is
saying that they’re even more dangerous than
ISIS.
The US
says it has hit a little-known group called “Khorasan” in Syria, but experts and activists argue it
actually struck Al-Qaeda’s affiliate Al-Nusra Front, which fights alongside
Syrian rebels.
In announcing its raids in the
northern province of Aleppo on Tuesday, Washington described the group it
targeted as Khorasan, a cell of Al-Qaeda veterans planning attacks against the
West.
But experts and activists cast doubt on the distinction between
Khorasan and Al-Nusra Front, which is Al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch.
“In Syria, no one had ever
heard talk of Khorasan until the US media brought it up,” said Rami Abdel
Rahman, director of the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
“Rebels, activists and the whole
world knows that these positions (hit Tuesday) were Al-Nusra positions,
and the fighters killed were Al-Nusra fighters,” added Abdel Rahman, who
has tracked the Syrian conflict since it erupted in 2011.
Experts were similarly dubious about the distinction.
“The name refers to Al-Qaeda fighters previously based in
Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran who have travelled to Syria to fight with… Al-Nusra,” said
Matthew Henman, headof IHS Jane’s Terrorism and Insurgency Centre. "They… should not be
considered a new or distinct group as such.”
“The fact that news about
this Al-Qaeda-run, anti-Western cell linked to Al- Nusra
emerged just over a week ago, through US intelligence leaks — well, it’s
certainly an interesting coincidence,” he told AFP.
***
Claims of a distinction are lost of many of Syria’s
rebels, who have also often rejected the world community’s designation of
Al-Nusra as a “terrorist” group.
When Washington added
Al-Nusra to its list of “terrorist” organisations, even the
internationally-backed Syrian opposition National Coalition criticised the
decision.
***
On the ground, almost all
rebel groups have been willing to cooperate with Al-Nusra, seeing them as
distinct from the Islamic State group (IS), which espouses transnational goals
and includes many non-Syrians among its ranks.
***
[The] history of cooperation
[between the various crazies in Syria] has left some rebels and activists on
the ground suspicious and even angry about the strikes on Al-Qaeda.
***
Some key members are believed
to maintain channels of communication with Al-Nusra, including Qatar, which has
helped negotiate the release of prisoners held by the group.
McClatchy adds:
Raad Alawi, the commander of a
smaller group of fighters, the Squadrons of Al Haq, told McClatchy he was very
angry.
“Starting the war with the
bombing of Nusra is an indication that this is a war against the revolution and
not [ISIS] … “Maybe next they will bomb the bases of the Free Syrian Army.”
Well, okay … experts and Syrian Islamic
jihadis think there’s no distinction between the Khorasans and plain vanilla Al
Nusra/Al Qaeda/Free Syrian Army fighters.
But surely America and our
allies treat the moderate Syrian rebels … I mean Al Nusra … er, I mean
theKhorasans … with a consistent iron fist?
Well, no … we’ve been – directly or indirectly – backing them.
And – as we’ve been warning for some time – the boys we’re
arming are threatening to attack us.
So – while I’d like to
believe that I’m being shown the real deal as a justification for long-term,
direct involvement – I’m just not buying it …
=====
2-
Press TV has conducted an interview with Jim W. Dean,
an editor at Veteran’s Today, in Atlanta, about the ISIL and the US-led
coalition to fight it.
The following is an approximate transcript of the interview.
Press TV: The US boasts that this is a US-led drive
but not a US fight, with 40 countries involved... we count one Jordanian
airstrike; so is there minimal participation by these countries as the US has
said they are the ones actually leading this?
Dean: A lot of this war
on terror stuff has been theater staging. The fraud that is going on
here is that the
war on terror – this thing on ISIS – is just another phony war on
terror because it is an offshoot of the terror campaign that we (the US)
launched against Syria.
They thought it was a great idea to take these
unemployed men with no marriage prospects and use them for cannon fodder –
inexpensive cannon fodder for regime change – because they knew American people wouldn’t support American
troops doing it anymore.
To think they thought they
were going to be able to control these people once they let it out like a
Frankenstein was just idiotic.
What’s happened is exactly what we said would happen, they changed sides... and the so-called moderate opposition fed the ranks of the more
radical ones because they were beating the Syrian army more.
This really took off when so-called
moderate rebels weren’t delivering the victory in Syria that they wanted;
they allowed [Persian] Gulf countries to fund the more radical ones to come in
and launch a northern campaign.
They (US and regional allies) put
brigade-sized terrorist groups into the field and we were astounded. Letting all of these people getting experience even when this
fight is over, they are going to be on the market to go somewhere else and you
are going to have mayhem going on all over the place, which is exactly what’s
happening.
So all they are trying to do now is to hide their mistakes and
try to keep the game going, but without accepting any
responsibility that
it’s a disaster that they created.
SC/HJL/KA
========
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario