SPEND-SAVE vs TAXING-BILLIONAIRES
Hugo Adan Nov 15
INTRODUCTION
Spending US
Money in weapons of mass destruction and wars abroad is the Aquiles’ heel that
makes our system very vulnerable, though it is a source of huge money to big
Corp and FED State institutions like PENTA, and NATO at world level.
Articulo discutido:
The whole reason the Fed is buying Treasury bonds in this “not QE”
program is to allow the spending and
borrowing to continue without pushing up interest rates...
….
…
Liar: remember that lie is a felony. Banks
lend money because of interest rate (if you said you want to avoid the rise of interest
rate , that is a lie. That is not possible in the current international context . Avoiding new interest rates is condemning banks to death. Do you really want to kill banks? That will be a good intention, but it is not
your intention of course, yours is just
the lie).
SPEND vs SAVE
It is the Mises Institute of economics
who said that saving money and preventing
un-necessary spending will save the
nation from debt. . Mises also said that practicing interest rate determine the amount of savings
available to growth the economy. Capital goods come into existence by saving,
if you do not save you will create the fake-debt economy like the one we have.
And Mises’ prediction happens : we
have trillion of USD in sovereign debt; and
the USD is being abandoned at world level..
In the Keynesian economics that now we practice, we force consumers, the Govt and
investors to spend money, as much as they can, no to save. If you do not
have money to spend they gave you a credit card and convert you into pawn or
new slave.
And FED Banks give bailouts &
QEs to investors and small Banks. The big Bank can give money to entire State-Nation at
a given interest rate, if they do not pay the Big Bank can take control of their
resources (oil, mines, water, litio in Bolivia, though this country don’t owed
nothing to US) .
US-CHINA HIDDEN ISSUE
The key of empire-power is lending
USD created from the thin air. That is the problem with China trade –they don’t
want to say but it is so. The fact is that China don’t need USD nor US need yuans. They have to create an
intermediate currency based on gold. Then, they will have fair trade deal. Now
china can expend all the USD they have & US all the yuans they have , but
this won’t last.
The other fact is that the currency is not the
major problem they have. China have SOEs (state owned enterprises) & US
have big private Corp & monopolies
that run the market and it is a fact
that our US market is collapsing.
THERE IS NO FREE MARKET ANYMORE
Privatization of the market vs.
Public Need & Public rule is the main
problem. There is not free and
honest competition inside our market. En mi art CONTRADICCIONES DE NUESTRO SISTEMA
ECONOMICO Indique que el mercado capitalista del US no es
“libre” . En el EXISTEN:
a-MONOPOLIOS y Grupos monopólicos: un limitado número de vendedores (oferentes) que pactan
acuerdos para influir en el precio del producto.
b-Existen OLIGOPOLIOS: el Mdo controlado por un
pequeño N. de empresarios
c-Aquí una gran empresa monopolista puede controlar un tipo de producto o
un servicios, por tanto decide el precio y la calidad
del producto o servicio ofertado. Es una situación transitoria (ST) es cierto,
pero existe.
d-OLIGOPSONIO: Mercado en el que hay pocos
demandantes y gran cantidad de oferentes. Aquí es el demandante o comprador
quien decide el precio. Si la oferta sube, el precio baja y para esto se recurre a la
inflation y se generan los bublles &
burst. (es también una ST agravada con alta volatilidad or VIX)
e- MONOPSONIO: Mdo donde hay un solo demandante y
un solo comprador.. hasta que vengan nuevos oferentes y nuevos compradores (es
también ST:)
f- Lo peor es que en el mercado
internacional es el chantaje militar Imperial el
que rompe Ados y leyes del Mdo con su chantaje militar , sanciones y otros
pillajes .. justo lo que hoy vemos in
“the trade-war between US-China”.
Todo eso mando al carajo el pretendido mercado
liberal donde supuestamente reina la Ley de la Oferta y la Demanda.
Es en ese
falso Mercado Libre es donde reina el Keynesianismo. Aquí ellos impusieron el principio “ Spending drives
Economic Growth, savings decrease it.“ Fortunately , the Keynesian economics doesn’t
work anymore.
Big Corp are going to bankruptcy right now & this system is going
to be declared obsolete very soon. We have
to be ready for such transition.
FDR: MIXING SOCIALISM
WITH CAPITALISM
One Economist said that China follow the example of FDR in the US. FDR Program was called NEW DEALS He never called socialism to his program, but
the red of coops was implemented
at national level without saying that it
was part of the socialist tradition. FDR
mixed capitalism with socialism in that project. He was the first Presid in the
US who taxed the billionaire to reconstruct the health, Education and other
Public needs. With his coops and other redes de produc the “productive middle
class was empowered “and the positive effects of his Economics lasted for almost 40 years.
In 1972 FDR Program received his 1st
attack. The dollar without gold support was installed and the fake economic
started. In 1985 with the Washington Consensus the neoliberal program with military support was inagurated . At the end of that century Clinton dismantled the
rest of the New Deals, after bombing Yugoslavia , the 1st country in
the world who mixed capitalism with socialism successfully with Tito in power.
Mixing capitalism with socialism is
nothing new in the world. The most successful
experience is of course China. The SOES
and private comp (many from US)
are working there hand on hand.
WE ARE READY
And now the new socialist in America
are ready to mix capitalism with socialism too. If the billionaires don’t want to pay taxes to
implement the Public needs, is fine, they can declare bankruptcy too,
because WS y la bolsa de valores de Chicago are going to be closed or ruled
with taxes in any transaction they made.
It is the Public need the main focus of
socialism (education, health, homes, coops and public networks
associations). Can billionaires be
able to defeat us? NOT, no way, we the
socialist will defeat them.
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario