domingo, 20 de octubre de 2019

ND OCT 20 19 SIT EC y POL



ND  OCT 20 19  SIT EC y POL 
ND denounce Global-neoliberal debacle y propone State-Social + Capit-compet in Eco


ZERO HEDGE  ECONOMICS
Neoliberal globalization is over. Financiers know it, they documented with graphics


"Being very unconventional, I think we have to be very careful of the possible negative effects of negative rates. I would be very, very careful in going further in this direction." - Italy Central Bank chief, Ignazio Visco

With the IMF's annual meeting now concluded, few topics discussed during the past week which saw the IMF downgrade its outlook for the global economy to the lowest GDP since the global financial crisis..
See Chart:
IMF Global Economic Growth Outlokk

Below we summarize some of the key quotes from last week's IMF conference on the topic of negative rates, courtesy of Reuters:

MORGAN STANLEY’S CEO JAMES GORMAN:
What Europe is experiencing with negative rates, obviously is really bad. Not just for the financial sector, but for the broader economy. Do I worry about them being too low? Listen, the Fed’s job is to manage the excesses and to prop up the weaknesses in any economic cycle. There’s no rulebook that Jay Powell’s got on his shelf behind saying at this point, with this information, you should do X. There’s a judgment call. I personally would be more cautious bringing rates down because you are using up one of the tools that you have... At this point, I would probably price one more cut for the rest of the year, and then I would really sit back, watch and wait.”

JPMORGAN CEO JAMIE DIMON ON LESSONS FROM THE CASE IN EUROPE:
“I think this is a lesson. I think they did it early on to save Europe basically from coming apart with the monetary union. We don’t know. I think they’ll be writing books about this in 50 to 75 years.
“[Negative rates] has huge negatives for savers and low-income people, for investors and for the capital markets. I, personally, would not buy debt below zero… There’s something irrational about it…I’m not sure the monetary rules are the same for a negative rate as they are for a positive one.”

TOBIAS ADRIAN, FINANCIAL COUNSELLOR AND DIRECTOR OF THE IMF’S MONETARY AND CAPITAL MARKETS DEPARTMENT:
Remarkably, the amount of government and corporate bonds with negative yields has increased to about $15 trillion. Moreover, markets expect about one-fifth of government bonds will have negative yields for at least three years. With rates staying lower for longer, financial conditions have eased, helping contain downside risks and support global growth for nowBut loose financial conditions have encouraged investors to take more risks in a quest to achieve their return targets.”

DANIEL PINTO CO-PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF JP MORGAN, SPEAKING AT THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCE:
“I think one of the problems with negative (interest) rates is that it tends to have less effect today than a few years ago. Before this current interest rate environment, if rates were going to be so low for so long, we would have started to get worried about the future. But today, as the population gets older and their priorities change, the distribution of rate changes don’t affect the economy as much. For our business, we prefer high interest rates more than low interest rates, but in general, it doesn’t make much of a difference.”
“In the insurance business and pension business, it makes more of a difference because they have certain liabilities that become more difficult to manage as rates go lower and lower.”

RAY DALIO, FOUNDER OF BRIDGEWATER ASSOCIATES:
Dalio said he was worried perpetually low or negative interest rates was creating a “crazy or odd” reality in which debtors barely had to service their debt.
“Interest rates become negative or near negative so the debt service payments for the interest rate are down a lot. And it’s almost a situation where there’s guaranteed debt rollover.”
Continue  reading at
….
----
----


"Only four times has the average marginal cost of production been below the commodity index price: in 2001 it was -5% below, 2008 it was -7% below, 2015 it was -12% below, and now it’s -2%."
Read this:
“When commodity prices fall below production costs, you kind of have an embedded put because producers cut supply, and demand draws down excess inventories. Longer-term, producers usually need roughly a 20% margin to continue capex and production.”

“From 1970-2009 the return for the commodity index (SPGSCI) and the S&P 500 both annualized at roughly +10%” said the same CEO. In the 1970s the S&P 500 annualized at +6.7% in nominal terms while the SPGSCI annualized at +21.2%. In the 1980s, the S&P annualized at +12.0% (SPGSCI +10.7%). In the 1990s the S&P 500 annualized at +14.1% (SPGSCI +3.9%). In 2000-2009 the S&P 500 annualized at +10.1% (SPGSCI +5.1%).

“Then QE kicked in. And from 2010-2018 the S&P 500 annualized at +11.7% while the commodity index annualized at -7.7%. So now commodity prices are -23% below where they were in the depths of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.”

“Why are people so uninvested in commodities?” asked the CEO, repeating my question. The Middle East is at war, yet oil trades 5% below the worldwide average marginal cost of production according to his estimates. While gold and silver trade roughly 50% above production costs, wheat and cotton trade 30% below their marginal cost to grow. And when you average out 21 major commodities, they’re about as cheap as they ever get relative to their marginal production costs.
“If I’ve learned one thing in all these years, it’s that people rarely look for value in commodities, they buy when things start going up,” he said.
….
----
----


As JPMorgan admits, the ECB’s net QE purchases alone would have been insufficient to offset the impact of the BoJ’s  ongoing QE tapering due to its effort to steepen its domestic curve. That's why the Fed had to s

See Chart:
Extreme liquidity policies keep us bullish
….
----
----

US  DOMESTIC POLITICS
Seudo democ duopolico in US is obsolete; it’s full of frauds & corruption. Urge cambio


"If they crash the economy, they are going to crash those New York banks. That’s the only restraint on the elites. That’s their ultimate nuke...They will wipe us out in order to get rid of Trump."
====

He must be dangerously close to 'Russian asset' status... 
====


This is only a partial list of what we've lost to globalism, cheap credit and the Tyranny of Price which generates the Landfill Economy...
====

US-WORLD  ISSUES (Geo Econ, Geo Pol & global Wars)
Global depression is on…China, RU, Iran search for State socialis+K-, D rest in limbo


State media is describing it only as "a fire in a canal carrying waste from Iran’s Abadan oil refinery."
====

Incoming ECB Head Christine Lagarde Says Trump Should Stop Criticizing Powell With Tweets
====


Fragile ceasefire already in question as both sides accuse the other of repeat violations.
….
La misma estupidez le dijo Trump a AMLO y ya son muchas las cabezas de USAnos  que se han cortado en Mx..se teme que fueron los narcos  y  se les está ofreciendo pacto sobre el tráfico de armas.  Por supuesto  esta oferta  es ridicul
====


" There is a problem of diagnosis... Even the most optimistic assumptions are unlikely to change the trend of weak global growth."
….
Not WIN-WIN SITUATION, and we already know that the US will  to be the loser
====


Despite Trump arguing it's “time to bring our soldiers back home” – they'll simply jump from one war zone to another.
…..
IRAQ?  Were we committed brutal genocide?  IF so, now is time of tit-for- tat
====


As US exits Syria, Pompeo in Israel describes "fundamental right" and "obligation" of Tel Aviv to act militarily...
….
For Pompe is easy to promote war. Does ISR want his county be wiped out of the map?
====

What is happening in Syria, following yet another Russia-brokered deal, is a massive geopolitical game-changer...
====
====


SPUTNIK and RT SHOWS
GEO-POL n GEO-ECO  ..Focus on neoliberal expansion via wars & danger of WW3

-US Forces Evacuating Wives of Daesh Militants From Syria's Northeastern Al-Hawl Camp  US-ISIS  alianza pegada con mocos de mujeres: es parte final  del terror aliado
-NATO Created Working Group for Monitoring Turkish Operation in Syria  La vanguar de NATO en el Middle-East ha sido derrotada. ERDO solo  gano una C por su trabajo en Siria, la C de CERDO y a Cerdogan lo único que le queda es retirarse. Si se queda: pone en peligro a su país; hacia allí apuntan los misiles  de Siria y aliados. El otro perdedor de esta aventura fue Israel… adiós al soñado petróleo  de  Siria.
----
----

NOTICIAS IN SPANISH
Lat Am search f alternatives to neo-fascist regimes & terrorist imperial chaos

RT  EN ESPAÑOL

----
===

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario