HILLARY IS ABOUT TO BE DISPOSED

HILLARY IS ABOUT TO BE DISPOSED 

HILLARY DEFLATES? A SETBACK FOR WAR   by TDB - Sep 14, 2016

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-14/hillary-deflates-setback-war

PREVIOUS INFO

Trump Soars In Latest Polls: Sees 5 Point Lead In Ohio And Latest LA Times National Poll

----

----

 

NOW RON PAUL. HERE ONLY EXTRACTS.  What comes inside brackets are my comments.

1- 

Ron Paul pointed out recently (here), the “deep state” elects whom it wants [[ not the American people ]] and it seems to have wanted Hillary Clinton. And even after Hillary’s most recent collapse, articles are appearing in the mainstream media  pointing out that Hillary is better than the alternative.

This is no coincidence. The mainstream media is owned by a relatively few people and they are surely supported by others,  hidden influencers for the so-called deep state. And it is this deep state that requires, if possible, the services of Hillary Clinton.

[[ So far, a naïve ‘systems determinism’ is that we have from Ron Paul.  
1- The FACT is that systems were changed & will be changed by political actions of social classes affected by it. All variables –other than corporate press- indicates that the time for change is about to arrive. 
2- At the level of hypothesis we can say that the old deep-state system don't need Hillary anymore. If they keep supporting her, both of them will be defeated -not only by Trump- but mainly by the emerging of a new system, that also may defeat Trump.]]

2-

The question is why the deep-state needs Hillary? ask Ron Paul

One theory (our current theory) is that a big war is evidently being planned at the highest levels. And Hillary is seen as the best individual for numerous reasons to prosecute this war.

[[ If war is the issue, that is an argument to dispose the warmonger Hillary, not to keep it. 
Most informed Americans are not in favor of war with RU-China & allies, and pacifism is growing up. Besides: 

A-The FACT: inside the deep state the corp who profit from wars abroad is a minority. Once the new Presid is installed –even if Hillary wins, the last probable change- the deep state will get internal conflict.. division that will force the radical reform of deep state. Otherwise the unity of the FED will be endangered.  

B- The corp press is preventing people to focus on real dangers, instead they distract the audience with false enemies & topics like (Rusia, Snowden, sickness of the lady). If nuke war comes..  the corp press will be blamed & perhaps burned. Now a new press is emerging and it will be difficult to buy it & mercenarized. ]] 

3-

There is not space to keep current status quo. Changes in politics & economics are coming very fast. Certainly the most probable candidate to win the election is Trump.. but anything can happens from her Nov 8. If Trump wins, the only way to make a strong Govt is the change rapidly the composition of the deep-state and install a kind of neo-bonapartist regime.  

4- 

The only problem for Trump is the vaccum of oligarchical power created by a sudden departure of Hillary .. nothing in his hands to delay or avoid such departure other than getting a deal with the libertarian, if the case need it. Not need so far, because the current deep state is doing the job of keeping Hillary. So, Trump can get a legitimate presidency by beating Hillary in the race.  

5-

The worse scenario for Trump  is the replacement of the insane Hillary for Elizabeth Warren, that will be a real challenge to him, if and only if the libertarians get the support of disaffected Trumpists. Then the question will be: Is E. Warren strong enough to defeat Trump (I doubt it). Warren is certainly the best person that Hillary co-opted & the time she has to enter the race is very short.  

6- 

Warren not only has to face Trump, she also has to defeat the People Front lead by Sanders- Stein, if Bernie goes with Jill ?.Sanders may abandon Jill again if Warren concedes the Presidency to him. But women factor plays a key role in current context and female voters may want a woman as President, so they may vote easy for Warren instead of Sanders. The Corp press can change voter mood and Sanders-Warren will the best formula for Dems to beat Trump is Sanders run to the presidency and Warren to VP. That will force Trump to promise whatever to the military to assure their vote. If Trump beats them, the real loser will be Sanders, not the socialist program he abandoned before.   Sanders will be abandoned by the masses and trash it in the can of history again.  

7- 

The best scenario for working and middle classes is the alliance Sanders-Stein. They may not defeat Trump in this election, but surely will defeat Trump  in the next one (he won’t be re-elected if the 3^rd option is introduced now). Sanders will be the winner anyway, history will remember him as creator of a big socialist movement in America.

The key of the game for Sanders & Stein is to break the duopoly system and introduce and affirm the third option in our democracy. ]]  

8- Ron Paul continues..

It may not be a nuclear war, [[immediately ]], suggest Ron Paul .. But the wars already exist and no doubt they are to be elaborated on.  ..  We have been taught in our academies and universities that WARS ARE FAIRLY SPONTANEOUS ERUPTIONS, UNPLANNED IN OTHER WORDS, BECAUSE NO ONE WANTS WAR. ..

[[ The WW3 is been planned carefully in both sides (US-NATO allies vs. Russia-China allies) ..the only deterrence is the principle of MAD (mutual assured destruction) .. but there are always unplanned actions and mistake that could start the nuke exchange.]]

9-

[[ The crap that bankers wants nuke war today. ]]

It is bankers, mostly, who want the global state and thus comes the saying, “all wars are bankers wars.” (Here.)  

[[ What they want is to conquest the world the way is been done today .. not with nuke war that put their business at risk. Once nuke war is started, it has to end in total demolition of both sides. There is not time limit for it, only space limits. If the destroyed power is done, the internal and world mini-wars will start and is clear that not one single barrack & US embassy in the world will remain intact. The new migrants from America will be rejected as the muslim are now in Europe. ]]

10- Why Hillary was selected by current corrupted deep-state? Here is the right Ron Paul!

Perhaps Hillary’s political longevity and familiarity with those planning this wider war .. Perhaps it was her gender, which was seen as making it more difficult for opponents to attack her as a warmonger. .. Maybe it was simply her political style. Having a female presenting the rationale for war – and doing so in a calm but determined way –  was seen as the preferred mechanism to unlocking and advancing World War III.

We’re not suggesting a wider war won’t happen no matter who is the US president. And certainly we’re not suggesting that it cannot happen without Hillary. But presumably it might be more difficult.

One can also hypothesize that Hillary’s self-destruction [[accepting the role of war monger? .. She enjoy clowning such role, as long as she see money in between.]]  has been in a sense pre-planned for a variety of reasons. But perhaps, just perhaps, elite determination to see Hillary elected was somehow sincere. .. Perhaps, just perhaps, she was the “indispensable man” who had the necessary credibility and public persona to usher in the upcoming war most easily and with the appropriate resolute spin.

If this is the case, AND IF SHE CANNOT RUN AND WIN, [this seems to be the case so far] then an upcoming major war may be more difficult (at least a little) to ignite and pursue.

CONCLUSION by Ron Paul : There’s no doubt that war was a political priority for Hillary throughout the Middle East and with Russia too. Without her, is it possible the bloodlust could lag?

My final comment

[[ So, if the deep state planned the auto-destruction of Hillary as war-monger..  well done! .. The whole argument here means that the current "deep-state" do not need her anymore .. Nuke-war with RU-China-Iran will not have winner, only huge human destruction. The issue war-mongerism of Hillary is not "deep" in the mind of American people. Then she can be disposed very soon .. if keep her, she will be defeated by Trump and many of the current obsolete-deep-state-personnel will be disposed by him as soon as he gets power..  and that will be in self defense.]]

----

----