A GLOBAL VIEW ON FUTURE FASCISM
Introduction by Hugo Adan
1- The main thesis in the art THE ROAD TO
fascim (below) is that “Asset owners in the west and the
middle class in emerging markets have seen their income grow rapidly
over the last 20 years, while the middle class in developed markets have not.
.. Naturally such grave disparity lead people to conclude it is either
the fault of the rich or global competition, when in reality the enormous
amount of capital consumption allowed by Keynesian policies is the real
culprit.”. There are two false premises in this thesis : A- “The grave
disparity between middle classes in the north & South as possible cause
and/or appeal of fascism worldwide”. Here
we sustain that Middle classes has little do with the emergence of fascism, it
is imperial terrorism in favor of big corp the main cause of fascism. B- “The
enormous amount of capital consumption allowed by Keynesian policies, is
favoring the emergence of Fascism or Nazism F-N”. This is also false, the case
of Chile show the reverse, fascism born there with the bless of two masters of
neoliberalism economics: Friedman & Kissinger . C- Our
argument here sustain that America is going to fascism if Hillary
Clinton arrives to power. The big-corporation network supporting her is
clear evidence of such trend.
2-
Most scholars on fascism (born in
Italy 1922 & adopted in Germany 1933 under the name of nazism) define
either one as terrorist dictatorship of regimes born from the alliance of big
corporations with political parties, parties that claim strong nationalism
(militaristis chovinism, plus war mongerism) en defense of the “national
security”. In short, it is the imperialist
expansion of financial capital the essence of either Fascism & Nazism (F-N).
This phenomena historically happens in time of economic crisis.
3-
There are F-N regimes installed democratically (Hitler was the 1st
one), so defining F-N as terrorist dictatorship of financial capital is
independent of the uses of democracy and democratic parties in explaining its emergence, though
some scholars define F-N as incapacity of the dominant oligarchy (financial
capitalists) to maintain power by using democratic means. Means & ends is a
source of confusion and we should make clear the prevalence of ends over means
(including the uses of middle classes) in the definition of F-N as economic
& political systems. In Chile some middle classes were used in the
terrorist military assault to power (the elected Gov of Allende was crashed
& 30,000 workers were killed). Since
the usual victims of fascism & Nazism is the labor or working classes.
4
The economic agenda of F-N was defined by Milton Friedman and the
political agenda by H Kissinger and Its Plan Condor in Chile. The Washington
Consensus legitimize aims & means of F-N during the Reagan Administration:
M Friedman monetarism became dominant and Keynes was declared obsolete. However,
Keynes’ thesis on the relation between consumption and disposable income that lead to
the notion of a government spending multiplier (private
investment spending, consumer spending, government spending, or
spending by foreigners on the country's exports) is still been used for QEs
& bailing out big crook Banks & corporations.
5
Friedman also argued that a
steady, though small expansion of the money
supply is his preferred policy. His ideas concerning monetary
policy, taxation,
privatization
and deregulation
were clearly stated in the Washington Consensus (1985). In his book Capitalism and Freedom, Friedman
advocated policies such as a volunteer military, freely floating exchange rates, abolition of medical
licenses, a negative income tax, and school
vouchers. His support for school
choice led him to found the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice,
later renamed EdChoice.
Just the core of neo-liberalism of our time (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman
) .
6
Since consumption & disposable
income depends on government spending, the issue “enormous amount of capital
consumption allowed by Keynesian policies” is irrelevant to explain the
emergence of F-N. Both Keynes & Friedman agree that money supply from
Central Banks is the key for “good neoliberal economics”. It is instead the misuses financial capital
into weapons production & wars abroad that is creating the current crisis. This
lead to the huge sovereign debt that is about to explode. This system only feed
speculators & vulture capitalism (not productive capitalism).
7
Those speculators are just the ones who are
financing the fake electoral democracy we have. Those are the source of F-N
nowadays. They are installing terrorist regimens where ever they go ; if
they do not adapt to imperial policies,
the empire destroy them like it happens in Afganisstan, Iraq, Lybia and Syria. They
like F-N regimes outside, but I don’t
think they want this system disappear with a nuke war with RU-China, they want instead
to keep the status quo. That Is why they are investing in this fake democracy
of Mrs Clinton.
After the experience in Chile ,
some variation in the means are been used in LA (the capture of elected Gov or
the dynamic of regime was implemented via “democratic” instruments like impeachment or simple Senate “coup”) for
the same objective: imperial financial expansionism & labor crack down. It is the latest, the brutal repression of
working classes the feature used today to define neo F-N.
----
----
Read this now:
History teaches us where
this will end...
….
Laws of politics have been
turned upside down. The Intellectuals
Yet Idiots can make no sense of it. The underdog who ‘tell it how it is’ appeal
to people while established reasoning does not. Politicians
used to pit people against each other and bribe key electoral groupings with
the spoils of ‘democratic’ victory to maintain power; well aware that the “…[process] will [only] endure until
the day [politicians] discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s
money.” From that day onwards, western democracies have been on a
slippery slope as the state consumes and redistributes
ever more of society’s productive capital. When taxes became
exploitative, the state went into debt. When workers’ real wages stagnated, the
central bank subsidized further indebtness.
….
With hindsight, it is obvious
that this political and financial pressure cooker would explode, and that is
exactly what we are living through right now. We are definitely on the cusp of a
major break with the old; rendering simple extrapolations useless as
a forecasting tool.
Politically the left-right divide
is way too narrow. Thinking
inside this box constricts the mind to such an extent that one will be unable
to understand what is going on and how this might end.
The striking ineptitude
pundits reveal when trying to analyze today’s political dislocation stems from two
simple facts.
First, they cannot wrap
their head around the fact that some nations apparently drift far left (Spain,
Portugal, Italy), while others far right (US, UK, Germany, France) and some in
both directions at the same time (Greece). ..
The old left-right divide was,
and still is, indistinguishable for the open minded. The following chart
attempt to show how we look at the political spectrum. As can be seen, the left-right axis is
nothing more than a childish quarrel on which special interest group is
entitled to most of the spoils. This model is
broken, consumed by its own greed, and the world of politics is rapidly
drifting into good old fascism. Whether
it is in the form of Trump, Clinton, Hollande, Le Pen, CDU, AfD, Podemos or
Golden Dawn is not important. What is
important is the fact that this shift is happening under the pretense of some
big intellectual battle of good versus evil. It is not. It is pure evil and we
are lead astray by the different way of delivering the message.
Secondly, the reason why the
broader electorate feel left out is the
fact that they have lost to global competition. Asset owners in the west and the
middle class in emerging markets have seen their income grow
rapidly over the last 20 years, while the middle class
in developed markets have not.
Naturally such grave disparity lead people to conclude it is either the fault of the rich or
global competition, when in reality the enormous
amount of capital consumption allowed by Keynesian policies is the real
culprit.
Today’s policies are efforts to
maintain the old status quo and can only prolong the middle class
suffering. This will
obviously lead to more political drift that will
quell growth and prosperity, calling for increased used of failed
policies ad infinitum.
History teaches us where this
will end.
----
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario