viernes, 21 de septiembre de 2018

Fri SEP 21 18 SIT EC y POL



Fri  SEP 21 18  SIT EC y POL
ND denounce Global-neoliberal debacle y propone State-Social + Capit-compet in Econ

“Everything the U.S. does hasn’t given any impression of sincerity and goodwill...We hope that the U.S. side will take measures to correct its mistakes.”
….

ZERO HEDGE  ECONOMICS
Neoliberal globalization is over. Financiers know it, they documented with graphics


Seriously...
Chinese stocks soared higher this week (SHCOMP +4.3%) - the best week since March 2016...
See Chart:


While China surged in two major National Team pumps, Europe was a one-way-street of stock-love all week...
See Chart:


But US markets were a little more mixed with The Dow leading, S&P holding gains, and Nasdaq, Small Caps, & Trannies all red...
It was quad-witch today, and a massive index reclassification, which prompted yuuge volume in stocks...the biggest NYSE Volume Day since July 2010...
See Chart:


On the day, The Dow trod water rather too calmly as the rest of the market rolled over...and some serious moves into the close.
Nasdaq broke back below 8,000...
Dow (blue) leads the way in September (+3%) as Small Caps (red) and Nasdaq (green) remain in the red...
FANG Stocks ended lower on the week
See Chart:


New industries are born and it is not a bubble


The yield curve steepened on the week (but was well off its steepest levels by the close)...
See Chart:


Notably after Tuesday's major surge in yields - back above 3.00%, 10Y Yields have largely trod water in a very narrow range...
See Chart:


The Dollar Index fell for the second straight week - the biggest two-week drop since January...
See Chart:


And as the Argentine Peso soared, Cable was even worse on the day than the Turkish Lira...
See Graph


The Hong Kong dollar jumped by the most since October 2003 this week, with analysts citing the prospect of higher rates in the city and stop losses as possible triggers.


The gap between these indicators widened in the 12 months ended Thursday by 20 percent, more than it has in any calendar year since 1997, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
And as stocks hit record highs in price and valuations, @ETF.com reports that a massive $34 bn poured into ETFs this week...
See Table:
....
….
----
----


Discretionary spending: spending which a Govt body is entitled to do but not legally required to undertake. (IT is at the discretion of the Pres if Law doesn’t exist). It includes both spending in real goods & services such as public works & grants to individuals & Orgts.  This article focus on the spending in military affairs since 1963 until today (See animated Video). Discretionary Spend is contrasted with “mandatory spending programs”where certain forms of spending is regulated by law or by rules of governing schemes like pensions or disability benefits.

...after adjusting for inflation (using 2009 dollars), discretionary spending has doubled since 1963.
See Video:
DISCRETIONARY SPENDING OVER TIME  in animated Video.. at the source below

THE U.S. BUDGET is generally divided into three main categories:
Discretionary Spending: This category, depicted in the animation, is the optional part of the budgetary equation – it’s the aspect that most people talk about, as the allocation of funding towards different things like defense, education, and transportation can be changed by lawmakers.

Mandatory Spending: Also known as entitlement spending, this category includes funding for programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. It’s called mandatory spending because the government legally is committed to fulfilling these obligations, and it exists outside of the normal budget appropriations process.

Net Interest: This category is for payments on the national debt, also something that is necessary unless the country is willing to default on these obligations.

DISCRETIONARY SPENDING TODAY
As the animation shows, after adjusting for inflation (using 2009 dollars), discretionary spending has doubled since 1963.

In 1963, which was essentially the height of the Cold War, the U.S. was spending 73% on the military to make up the vast majority of the $547 billion (2009 dollars) in discretionary spending.

Meanwhile, in Fiscal Year 2019, the government has allocated $1.3 trillion (today’s dollars) to the budget:
SEE CHART:

Things haven’t changed much since 1963 in that defense still comprises the majority of spending – in fact, the only recent time periods where U.S. defense spending fell below 50% were roughly between 1977-1981 and 1999-2004.

American spending on defense dwarfs all other countries, but there are other categories that make up decent chunks of the discretionary budget as well.

While they seem small on the above chart, transportation (7%), education (7%), and veteran benefits (6%) are all actually categories that receive over $70 billion of annual funding – still a significant piece of change.
….
[[ Notice: If we add the Veteran benefits 7% , to the military spending –as happens before—we have more than 57% in military spending . Check how much we spend during WW2 .. Are we at war again? When this last war was legally declared? If never.. who decided? .. The Military-Ind-Compl.. who give them power to do so?.. Are we a democratic country or a neo-nazi one? ]]
….
----
----


"We are still living in the destabilized, debt-ridden aftermath of such pro-bank advocacy...Something has to give, and it isnot likely to be the savings of the donor class at the top of the economic pyramid..."


Today’s financial malaise for pension funds, state and local budgets and underemployment is largely a result of the 2008 bailout, not the crash. What was saved was not only the banks – or more to the point, as Sheila Bair pointed out, their bondholders – but the financial overhead that continues to burden today’s economy.

Also saved was the idea that the economy needs to keep the financial sector solvent by an exponential growth of new debt – and, when that does not suffice, by government purchase of stocks and bonds to support the balance sheets of the wealthiest layer of society. The internal contradiction in this policy is that debt deflation has become so overbearing and dysfunctional that it prevents the economy from growing and carrying its debt burden.

Trying to save the financial overgrowth of debt service by borrowing one’s way out of debt, or by monetary Quantitative Easing re-inflating real estate, stock and bond prices, enables the creditor One Percent to gain, not the indebted 99 Percent in the economy at large

Read more extracts from this article:
A basic principle should be the starting point of any macro analysis: The volume of interest-bearing debt tends to outstrip the economy’s ability to pay. This tendency is inherent in the “magic of compound interest.” The exponential growth of debt expands by its own purely mathematical momentum, independently of the economy’s ability to pay – and faster than the non-financial economy grows.

The higher the debt/income ratio rises, the more interest, amortization payments and late fees are extracted from the economy. The resulting debt burden slows the economy, causing defaults. That is what happened in 2008, and is accelerating today as debt ratios are rising for corporate debt, state and local debt, and student debt.
Something has to give, and it is not likely to be the savings of the donor class at the top of the economic pyramid. As a result, the economy at large is threatened with an exponentially expanding erosion of disposable income and net worth for most people and companies. Investment managers are warning of a financial meltdown, given today’s historically high price/earnings ratios for stocks and also for rental properties.

What is not acknowledged is that such a crisis is a precondition for today’s economy to recover from the rising debt/income and debt/GDP ratios that are burdening the United States, Europe and other regions. At least the United States has been able to monetize its budget deficits and subsidize banks to carry its rising debt overhead with yet new debt.
….
None of this was spelled out in the September 15 weekend marking the tenth anniversary of Lehman Brothers’ failure and subsequent rescue of Wall Street. President Obama, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and their fellow financial lobbyists at the Federal Reserve and Justice Department are credited with saving “the economy,” as if their donor class on Wall Street was a good proxy for the economy at large. “Saving the economy from a meltdown” has become the euphemism for saving bondholders and other members of the One Percent from taking losses on their bad loans. The “rescue” is Orwellian doublespeak for expropriating over nine million indebted Americans from their homes, while leaving surviving homeowners saddled with enormous bubble-mortgage payments to the FIRE sector’s owners.
….
What has been put in place is not a restoration of traditional status quo, but a reversal of over a century of central bank policy. Failed banks have not been taken into the public domain. They have been enriched far beyond their former levels. The perpetrators of the collapse have been rewarded, not penalized for lending more than could possibly be paid by NINJA borrowers and speculators whose mortgage applications were doctored by systemic fraud at Countrywide, Washington Mutual, Bank of America, Citigroup and their cohorts.

The $4.3 trillion that could have been used to save debtors was given to the banks and Wall Street firms whose recklessness and outright fraud caused the crisis. The Federal Reserve “cash for trash” swaps with insolvent banks did not restore normalcy or the status quo ante. What occurred was a financial revolution by stealth, reversing the traditional responsibility of creditors to make prudent loans.
Quantitative Easing saved creditors and the largest stockholders and bondholders by lowering the interest rates by enough to make it profitable for new loans to inflate asset prices on credit
….
Among Democrats, the most extreme tunnel vision denying that debt is a problem comes from Paul Krugman:
Writing that “The purely financial aspect of the crisis was basically over by the summer of 2009, ”he criticized what he called the “bizarre Beltway consensus that despite high unemployment and record low interest rates, debt, not jobs, was the real problem.”

This misses the point that 2009 was the real beginning for most of the nine million homeowners being foreclosed on and evicted from their homes….  We are still living in the destabilized, debt-ridden aftermath of such pro-bank advocacy.

Can a bailout without debt write-downs really bring prosperity? Can economies achieve growth by “borrowing their way out of debt,” by creating enough new credit to cover the interest charges out of capital gains from the asset-price inflation fueled by new bank credit. That is the logic that has guided the Federal Reserve’s net $4.3 trillion in Quantitative Easing, and the parallel credit creation by the European Central Bank under Mario “Whatever it takes” Draghi.
---
The key financial principle is that this self-expansion of interest-bearing debt grows to absorb more and more of the economic surplus. The solution therefore must involve wiping out the excess debt – and savings that have been badly lent. That is what crashes are supposed to do. It was not done in 2008. That is why the status quo was not restored. A vast giveaway to the financial elites occurred, setting the rest of the economy on a road to debt peonage.

  • It would have been nice to have read an article by Sheila Bair explaining the procedures that the FDIC had in place, ready to take over insolvent Citigroup and other banks in similar straits, saving all the insured depositors by taking over these institutions. No doubt as public institutions they would not have indulged in junk mortgages or, for that matter, takeover loans.

  • It would have been nice to hear from Hank Paulson and perhaps Barney Frank on how they tried to get incoming President Obama to write down bad mortgages whose carrying charges were as far above the debtor’s ability to pay as they were above the going rental value for similar properties.

  • It would have been nice to hear a mea culpa from Mr. Obama apologizing for representing the interest of his campaign donors by standing between them and his voters with pitchforks. Even an article by Tim Geithner or Eric Holder on how lucky they felt at getting such high-paying jobs after they left office from the financial sector they had overseen and “regulated.”
….
What is needed now is to follow up the primary policy perception that today’s financially dysfunctional economy cannot be saved without a bank crash. That means rolling back the enormous gains that the FIRE sector has made since 1980 at the expense of the “real” economy.  Banks have ceased to be an “engine of growth.” They are not making loans to create new means of production. They are lending to asset strippers, not asset creators.
At stake is whether the U.S. and Western European economies are going to end up looking like those of Greece, Latvia and Argentina – or imperial Rome for that matter. Neoliberals applaud today’s victorious finance capitalism as the “end of history.” One such end has already occurred once, at the close of Roman antiquity. It is remembered as the Dark Age. Progress stopped as the creditor and landowning class lorded it over the rest of society. Trade survived only among the lords at the top of the economic pyramid. Today’s “End of History” dream threatens to unfold along similar lines. It is all about relative power of the One Percent.
----
----


As one would expect, pay/salary was at the top of the list across all respondents but what followed varied by generation and gender, with some surprising shifts.

The US labor market has recently been faced with two distinct and opposing trends.
See Chart:
Job opening vs. People Unemployed


However, for Millennials and Generation X, it was less clear cut. While traditional benefits still ranked high on their lists, younger workers reported greater importance of other non-monetary "lifestyle" benefits such as flexible hours and workplace perks (e.g. free meals/snacks, bring pets to work). Meanwhile, of all factors, Millennials put surprisingly low weight on retirement benefits while healthcare benefits was on par with flexible hours.
See Chart:


Broken by gender, the survey revealed that women placed greater importance to healthcare benefits and flexible hours while men put more emphasis on workplace perks and company equity.
See Chart:


The results support the view that shift in preference by younger generation for greater nonmonetary compensation is one of the many explanations for the slow pace of wage growth this cycle.

The survey also asked respondents about their views on labor market conditions. Consistent with other consumer surveys, the US worker generally was feeling good about their job prospects. The share of respondents reporting it is easier to find or switch a job increased in August compared to when we asked in May with Baby Boomers showing the greatest improvement.
See Chart:

See more charts at:
----
----


“It’s all fun and games until someone gets their eye put out....”

An interesting thing has begun to occur in the market which is more a symptom of exuberance than prudence as there seems to be nothing that can derail the market advance to new highs. However, as Doug Kass noted recently in his diary, the ingredients to shock market participants are already in place.
  • Speculative activity is on the rise (materially so in the case of Tilray (TLRY) and others in the space).
  • Investor complacency (not a soul, save permabears, are looking for anything like a large markdown in market).
  • Rising interest rates — with the pace of the yield climb now accelerating to the upside.
  • Trade and tariff risk is rising.
  • An extreme change in the market structure — much like portfolio insurance in 1987, (ETF and Quant strategies and products dominate the market) — in which participants are all on the same side (long) of the boat.
  • Social unrest as the benefits of monetary and fiscal policies failed to trickle down.
  • Weak market seasonals.
  • Technical divergences.

The market is currently ignoring, in my opinion, two of the biggest risks to the fundamental underpinnings of the market which are earnings growth and valuation. [ Where are they?]

The following video takes a deep dive into rates and historical outcomes.
See Video

But this is THE chart you should be paying attention to:
See Chart:

There are several important points to note in the chart above:
  1. In the past 40-years, there have only been seven (7) other occasions where rates were this overbought. In each case, it was a great time to buy bonds and sell stocks. (When rates got oversold, it was time sell bonds and buy stocks.)
  2. There were only two (2) other periods where rates were this extended above their long-term moving averages. The one that occurred between 1980-1982 began the long-term decline in bond prices. 
  3. Economic growth has peaked every time rates got this extended. (Which shouldn’t be a surprise.)
  4. Whenever rates have previously pushed 2-standard deviations of their 2-year moving average – bad things have tended to occur such as the Crash of 1974, Crash of 1987, Long-Term Capital Management, Russian Debt Default, Asian Contagion, Dot.com crash, and the Financial Crisis.

While the markets are currently ignoring the risk of higher rates, even a cursory glance at the chart above suggests that we are near the point where rates will matter.”

I suspect the “Magic Number” is likely no higher than 3.25%.
But we will only know for sure when the rabbit pops out of the hat.”
Meanwhile check your weekend reading list.

Economy, 2008 & Fed
----
Markets
----
Most Read On RIA
----
Research / Interesting Reads
---
----
----


US  DOMESTIC POLITICS
Seudo democ duopolico in US is obsolete; it’s full of frauds & corruption. Urge cambio


"The elites and the media are trying to convince you that this inexpiable leaving of the factories and jobs is but a law of physics. The opposite is actually true – it is the human action which did it. It can be reversed and it will be reversed." 
----
----

Here’s something you don’t see every day:Chicago’s progressive Readeraligned with conservative Breitbart. Both had articles Wednesday slamming the Obama Center to be built in Chicago’s Jackson Park.
----
----

US-WW ISSUES (Geo Econ, Geo Pol & global Wars)
Global depression is on…China, RU, Iran search for State socialis+K-, D rest in limbo

3 short news with big content
1-
“Everything the U.S. does hasn’t given any impression of sincerity and goodwill...We hope that the U.S. side will take measures to correct its mistakes.”
----
2-
Most investors are unaware that these peak panic moments (Sept. 28, 1998 and Sept. 15, 2008) had actually been playing out for over 15 months in both cases. Investors who closely observed the early signs of troublehad ample time to get out of the way of the panic itself...
----
3-
"Eventually this mess is going to spill into the US markets... When it does, the bursting of the Everything Bubble will have officially hit US shores."
----
----


SPUTNIK and RT SHOWS
GEO-POL n GEO-ECO  ..Focus on neoliberal expansion via wars & danger of WW3


----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
RT SHOWS

----
----
----
----
----
----
----


NOTICIAS IN SPANISH
Lat Am search f alternatives to neo-fascist regimes & terrorist imperial chaos


Rebel    COL  Duque y el armadillo  Aureliano Carbonell
                ECON El porqué de la guerra económica de Trump  Hedelberto López
                Cuba  Presidente y pueblo constituyente (I)  Ángel Guerra
                FEM  Feminicidios y manadas militares en Paraguay  María Sanz
                Iraq  El levantamiento de Basora conmociona Iraq  Safaa Khalaf
                Or P  La nueva estrategia iraní de Israel  Maysam Behravesh
                D H   -Exigimos juicio justo para Berta Cáceres
                ECON Consumismo ético: el mercado de la moral  Alberto Martín
                OPIN  Cambiar radicalmente el orden social vigente  A Teitelbaum
                ALC  Guatemala  Hacia lo profundo  Kajkoj Máximo Ba Tiul
                ALC  ¡Se busca a Almagro!  Patricio Montesinos
                COL  Gobierno cínico e impotente en busca d tiempo perdido Fdo D
                MEX  -AMLO y las pensiones  Miguel Ángel Ferrer
                España  -El momento político y el laicismo  Antonio Gómez
                Cuba  "Ninguno de nosotros sabe más que todos nosotros juntos" PV
----
                Otra paz demasiado endeble para Sudán del Sur   Guadi Calvo
                Ecuador Sumak kawsay: una mirada desde la perspectiva indígena 
                Col-US-Ven Evidenc de la crisis del Grupo Lima y su llamad a interv 
                Brasil: una elección decisiva   Juan Manuel Karg  
                ¿Razones para el desarme? ¡Todas!   Juana Pérez Montero
                México   AMLO, bancarrota y polémica   Eduardo Ibarra
----
                ----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----

               
INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE
Deep on the US political crisis: neofascism & internal conflicts that favor WW3


----
----


GLOBAL RESEARCH
Geopolitics & Econ-Pol crisis that leads to more business-wars from US-NATO  allies


----
----
----
----
---


PRESS TV
Resume of Global News described by Iranian observers..


----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
===

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario