viernes, 24 de junio de 2016

SUPER-DELEGADOS.. ARE PAY ACTORS OF ELECTORAL FRAUD?



SUPER-DELEGADOS..  ARE PAY ACTORS OF ELECTORAL FRAUD?

FACT: Superdelegates snatched Sanders’s victory several times. 
part 1

SP FUNCION: MISION ACCOMPLISHED by RIGGING PRIMARIES?
IF THEY WORKED FOR MONEY THEY ARE SIMPLE MERCENARIES
IF THEY ARGUE PRINCIPLES  .. nothing to do with real DEMOCRACY

Check the coming art:  
SD COMPLICITY in HILLARY's ELECTORAL FRAUD

and in case you miss it: 

Posted on June 16, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, US
....
....


 
Sources so far:

How electoral fraud works in America? Recent articles, by Hugo Adan,
LAS PRIMARIAS y COMO FUNCIONA  EL FRAUDE , Marzo 9/16

Besides:
1- RIGGED DEMOCRACY – NEARLY 10% OF DEMOCRATIC PARTY SUPERDELEGATES ARE LOBBYISTS
….

2- The Reason Why Dozens of Lobbyists Will Be Democratic Presidential Delegates
By JEFF NAFT. Feb 29, 2016,
....
3- RELATED ARTICLES
BASIC INFO ON SUPERDELGATES ( SD now on)   published by http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/reason-dozens-lobbyists-democratic-presidential-delegates/story?id=37289507 . Intev to Mark Paustenbach, national press secretary for the Democratic National Committee.” 
....

----

4- Recent bibliography:

Mar 31, 2016 – In addition, The Heritage Foundation's voter fraud database catalogues over 400 cases of proven voter fraud throughout America. Cases: Penn, Alabama % New Hampshire
----

 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Published 1:38 pm EDT, March 23, 2016
----

by Doug Johnson Hatlem  May 9, 2016  Seriously?  ..  based on exit polling  … knowing that polling Com are pro-business affair, then paid by Hillary  … Seriously?  Though declaring that “Exit polling has been far more accurate on the GOP side than on Dems side.  ..
....
The previous author should've consider seriously this article:

 
1.       Exit polls have a much larger intrinsic margin for error than regular polls. This is because of what are known as cluster sampling techniques. Exit polls are not conducted at all precincts, but only at some fraction thereof.
2.       2. Exit polls have consistently overstated the Democratic share of the vote. Many of you will recall this happening in 2004, when leaked exit polls suggested that John Kerry would have a much better day than he actually had.
3.       Exit polls were particularly bad in this year’s primaries. They overstated Barack Obama’s performance by an average of about 7 points.
4.       Exit polls challenge the definition of a random sample.
5.       Democrats may be more likely to participate in exit polls. Scott Rasmussen has found that Democrats supporters are more likely to agree to participate in exit polls (TV press paid)
6.       Exit polls may have problems calibrating results from early voting.
7.       Exit polls may also miss late voters.
8.       “Leaked” exit poll results may not be the genuine article. Sometimes, sources like Matt Drudge and Jim Geraghty have gotten their hands on the actual exit polls collected by the network pools.
9.       A high-turnout election may make demographic weighting difficult. Just as regular, telephone polls are having difficulty this cycle estimating turnout demographics — will younger voters and minorities show up in greater numbers?
10.   You’ll know the actual results soon enough anyway. Exit polls are really more trouble than they’re worth, at least as a predictive tool. An independent panel created by CNN in the wake of the Florida disaster in 2000 recommended that the network completely ignore exit polls when calling particular states. I suggest that you do the same.
----
---
and also check if true that the hacker denounced by Bloomberg is working with Hillary' team
Mar 31, 2016 - Andrés Sepúlveda rigged elections throughout Latin America for almost a decade. ... history of one of the dirtiest Latin American campaigns in recent memory. .... He was paid $15,000 in cash for a month's work, five times as much as he .... hacked his Twitter account and posted allegations of election fraud.
….
….
Posted on June 16, 2016 by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, US
Jun 16, 2016 - Stanford University study confirms Democratic election fraud .... Reads an article on report about fraud and then supports the person responsible. .... Except that trump was bailed out in 1990 by the US gov't and forced to hire .... They won't accept ANY evidence to the contrary – they will work tirelessly to ...
----
----
6-
pending searches: 
6.1 more on SD COMPLICITY in Hillary's ELECTORAL FRAUD
6.2  more on DEMOCRATIC ELECTORAL FRAUD 2016
----
---- 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario