JUNE 7 16 SIT EC y POL
....
CLINTON’S FRAUD NO PASARA!. CA WILL NOT VOTE HER
LAST NIGHT (8pm) she was declared winner in CA by
Associated Press.
This info came from
AP http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/fronts/HOME?SITE=AP last night and it read: “Clinton reached the 2,383 delegates needed to become the
presumptive Democratic presidential nominee on the eve of Tuesday's voting,
according to an Associated Press tally. Her total is comprised of pledged
delegates won in primaries and caucuses, as well as superdelegates - the party
officials and officeholders who can back a candidate of their choosing.” The
note said that votes were counted “in California,
New Jersey and four other states” . THE FACT is that there were
not election in CA yesterday, neither mail vote counted. NO official data on
it: he election is set for today June 7. So all this AP
news was based on a lie & intentional fraud. How much she paid for
this scam?
Why she did it?
1st-THE
SELF-NOMINATION WITH THE HELP OF HER PAID SD IS A FRAUD. Hilary’s machine paid
super-delegates to distort the real results of primary-election by creating
victories that Hillary did not get in the ballot-box. Their message was: “vote
for winner”, the fake winner they created. The paid-press or corporate media disseminated such lies -“Hillary’
lie”- over and over until they converted into “true”. This fraud is what
Hillary’s zelots is celebrating tonight, 8 hours before the announced time.
(this was scheduled for tomorrow at 5pmET) The question is why they advanced
this news for tonight when total numbers of SD expected to give to her (2,364)
were there for more than 2 weeks?.
2nd-
The REASON WHY SHE ANNOUNCED at 9pm this night her auto-nomination of the Dems
party to run for Presidency is directly related to the issue e-mails-gate and
the decision of the FBI & Supreme Court to indict her today in the morning.
Her fault has been aggravated:
Hillary’s fraud is not only against the electorate of CA (pools said yesterday that she was going to
be defeated in CA), the major fraud is now to the
Nation and against the US Law and its authorities. She really
believe that she is above the Law, this is exacltly that I called “arrogance of
money”. The billionaire Trump did it, he mocked on Judges of the Supreme Court
yestedary and she believes “WHY NOT ME” and she did tonight. The only
difference is the dimension of the felony
.. Hillary’s is huge compared to the one from Trump. Of course both are
destroying the Justice System in America, both are practicing the stupid
arrogance of money. She is not going the get immunity nor impunity to her
fault. The victory of Sanders in CA should be converted now into a victory
against political fraud & legal fraud.
WE
SHOULD TAKE STREET AND SHOUT LAUDER:
“NO MORE FRAUDS
.. Hillary go to jail”
NO
MORE IMPUNITY .. HILLARY GO TO JAIL
----
----
ZERO HEDGE
ECONOMICS
What "most-hated" rally?
Investor Sentiment has reached "Extreme Greed"...
Its least fearful in two years...
Check charts on the current collapse of the economy below
& here at: http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/06/06/20160607_fear2_0.jpg
----
----
The Deep State, in addition to
being malignant and entertaining, is incompetent. It fights wars
just to lose them. It solves problems and makes them worse. Led by the Yellen Fed, it “improves” the
economy and leaves 9 out of 10 people poorer than they were before.
Continue reading this interesting Art at : http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-07/free-money-leaves-everyone-poorer
----
----
A key index of
biotechnology stocks may be approaching
significant levels of resistance
A key index of biotechnology stocks may be approaching
significant levels of resistance.
Throughout the course
of the post-February rally, one topic that has been bandied about (including by
us) is the question of a new bull
market up-leg vs. a bear market rally. At the root of the
question is the magnitude of potential upside to the current bounce. .. Under that scenario, perhaps the largest
cap-weighted indices may be able to score new highs, but likely not by any
significant amount. Furthermore, the broader stock indices would most likely
fall short of previous highs, indicative of a mere mean-reversion bounce (albeit
an impressive one).
After leading the market higher for three years, biotech
stocks have been experiencing the ugly side of a bubble, post-pop, over the
past 12 months. Thus, while the sector has been enjoying a solid bounce off
of its February lows, as a % of its 2015-2016 decline, its gains pale in
comparison to almost any other sector. What that also means is that much of the
potential resistance stretching up to the sector’s July 2015 top has yet to be
tested.
One major area of potential resistance appears to be fast
approaching on the most popular biotechnology index, the “BTK”. Large image at: http://67.media.tumblr.com/595b04ca5f7882eeb0c2be9d7eb6f244/tumblr_inline_o8dg7w24cc1sq14jh_500.jpg
As you see, there are plenty of challenges nearby that
the BTK will need to overcome if it wants to extend its rally much further. Having
closed at 3336 today, there is not much more room higher before the index hits
that upper 3400 resistance zone. If the BTK fails to overcome this area, it
would be further evidence arguing in favor of the biotech sector experiencing a
mere bear market rally.
Of course, with challenges comes opportunity. And as with
our Russell 2000 post last week, in the event that the BTK is
able to surmount this area of resistance, it will open up considerable further
upside (roughly 10% more perhaps, by our analysis, to near the 3750 level).
First thing first, however. The BTK has to break through
these multiple resistance layers to open up that upside. Considering the
challenge there, as well as our view of the biotech bounce being a
mean-reversion, bear market rally, we’d look for the rally to fizzle out in the
vicinity of the aforementioned levels – until it proves otherwise.
----
----
As stock algos push indices ever higher in their inevitable
push for all-time-highs, investors are flooding into developed market bonds
sending German 10Y Bunds to a new record low 4.8bps (following Aussie record
lows overnight) and dragging US Treasury yields drastically lower.
Check more Bloomberg charts on this topic at: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-07/bund-yields-drop-new-all-time-low-dow-rises-above-18000
----
----
VIX is surging off an ovenight 12 handle, USDJPY and
bond yields are tumbling to the lows of the day and US equity futures, while
up, have given back the overnight exuberance gains... something's different
today
See image at: http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/06/06/20160607_VIX2_0.jpg
----
----
Copper futures are tumbling by the most in 2 months (testing
back towards 4 month lows) after the biggest two-day increase in copper
stockpiles monitored by LME since 2004.
See image at: http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/06/06/20160607_copper_0.jpg
----
----
It is now painfully
obvious that Ben Bernanke blew it big-time by not raising rates three years ago
when the economy and markets enjoyed tailwinds. The former Federal Reserve
chairperson, who has claimed the mantle of savior of the global economy,
foolishly kept rates at zero until tailwinds turned to headwinds, at which point
he handed Janet Yellen the unenviable task of raising rates as the headwinds
are strengthening.
----
----
For the second
quarter in a row, US worker productivity fell in Q1 (down 0.6% QoQ). Outside of
2015's weather-driven debacle, this is the weakest two quarter tumble in productivity since Q4 2012. Unit
labor costs rose 4.5% QoQ in Q1 (revised up from 4.1%) as output actually fell
0.6% (implying a 3.9% rise in compensation). This is the 3rd quarterly drop in output in a row.
See image at: http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/06/06/20160607_prod_0.jpg
----
----
POLITICS
In the last question
from Janet Yellen's Q&A during her speech in Philadelphia, a retiree asked
Yellen if Donald Trump becomes president whether "there is a possibility
of an economic crash all over the world because of the how the world views
Donald Trump" and whether Yellen thinks that is possible. Here is her
response.
[ All the establishment supporting Hillary –the pro-war
candidate- they want to status quo prevail & the explosive inequality to
continue .. The worse: they want to initiate WW3 putting at risk our nation and
the whole humanity. ]
----
----
ME & WORLD ISSUES
A huge global trade
war is on the horizon, regardless of whether Hillary or Trump wins the
election, as the Obama administration's
own protectionists are on the cusp of a “Pyrrhic victory” over China.
In 2011, the US put huge tariffs on Chinese-made tires (to the detriment of
consumers and the auto industry). China responded with anti-dumping tariffs on
GM.
----
----
----
----
DEMOCRACY NOW
----
----
----
----
GLOBAL RESEARCH
----
----
----
----
----
----
RT SHOWS
Keiser
Report. Episode
924
Max and Stacy discuss bad boys
and bond markets. They also discuss ‘modern serfdom’ as American employees
increasingly rely on loans from their employers. In the second half, Max
interviews Satyajit...
----
----
----
Worlds
Apart. Aid
in need?
----
----
CrossTalk. Bullhorns
blasting
----
Going
Underground World
without borders & London’s ivory towers (E351)
----
WASHINGTON BLOG
By Joe Lauria. Originally
published at Consortium News.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/
Hillary Clinton needs to win 613 of the remaining 775
pledged delegates to clinch the Democratic Party nomination for president.
That’s the math, though not what you’ve been seeing in the corporate media’s
headlines.
With Clinton neck-and-neck with Sen. Bernie Sanders in the
opinion polls for Tuesday’s California primary, where 475 pledged delegates are
at stake, it’s very unlikely she’ll have the required 2,383 pledged delegates
going into the Philadelphia convention next month. That means Clinton will need
the votes of super-delegates, those unelected, pre-selected, party insiders
chosen specifically to prevent a grass-roots insurgent candidate like Sanders.
By a large margin, Clinton leads Sanders in super-delegates
who have indicated how they intend to vote. But unlike pledged delegates, bound
by the will of the voters, the super-delegates can change their minds right up
to the convention night when they must cast their ballot.
That is not what the Associated Press misleadingly reported
on Tuesday however. It has prematurely declared Clinton the Democratic nominee,
even though she’s short of the required pledged delegates. AP and other
corporate media are making a huge assumption that the super-delegates will
stick with her until Philadelphia.
⇒ Keep Reading
⇒ Keep Reading
----
----
Flashback:
“Networks are Colluding” to Declare Clinton the Overall Winner Before
California Polls Close Posted on June 7, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog
By Gaius Publius,
The writer of the
quoted part of the headline above is Shaun King. Here’s the quote in
full and in context.
When a grown man tells you he is about to start trouble, believe him.
What followed, if Matthews is to be taken at his word, is clear
evidence that television networks are colluding together to call the primary
for Hillary Clinton before she reaches the delegates needed to claim victory.
By doing so, they will absolutely suppress the vote in the final states that
will be cast ballots in the Democratic primary. Even by mentioning it now, that
the networks have already set the date and time they are calling the race for
Hillary, what Matthews has done runs the very real risk of suppressing voter
turnout. It’s disgusting.
That date and time is
8:00 pm Eastern time, 5:00 pm Pacific time, on June 7, the night of the
California primary. (Also the night of five other primaries or caucuses and the
last-but-one night of Democratic Party voting.)
⇒ Keep Reading
⇒ Keep Reading
----
----
The
Lie That “China Wins” if the TPP Kangaroo Tribunals are Stopped Posted
on June 7, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog
By William K. Black, Associate Professor of Economics and Law
at the University of Missouri at Kansas City
Proponents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) know that
they have a major problem. Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and Donald
Trump each oppose the deal. CEOs, however, have not given up on their
dream of being able to rig the international system through the creation of
kangaroo tribunals that can, effectively, destroy effective regulation and the
enforcement of rules to protect the public. As I explained in my most recent column on this subject, “trade” is simply
the pretext for this assault on the rule of law and national sovereignty.
President Obama plans to try to get the TPP approved by the lame duck Senate
after the November elections. Outgoing officials no longer must fear (or
respect the will of) the voters and they are eager to cash in on the corporate
largess that will reward politicians that vote for the international CEO
impunity deals.
The “serious people” of the lame
stream media are encouraging the lame ducks to vote for the CEOs’ dream
deal. One of their principal claims is “If T.P.P. falls apart, China
wins. It’s as simple as that.” TPP is deliberately opaque, complex, and
crafted in secrecy by the CEOs’ lobbyists to be the opposite of “simple.”
It has nothing to do with China winning or losing. TPP is all about Article 9 of the TPP, which allows
CEOs to rig the system so that the CEOs win and the people and nations lose.
If the TPP becomes law Chinese CEOs win because the kangaroo tribunals of
Article 9 will intensify the global “race to the bottom” that is eviscerating
what remains of the rule of law even in nations that are not parties to the
TPP.
⇒ Keep Reading
⇒ Keep Reading
----
----
Posted on June 7, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog
By Ray McGovern,
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is in a legal
pickle over her careless email practices – in that she appears to have
endangered national security secrets including
the identity of covert CIA officers and done so for selfish reasons
(personal convenience or keeping her documents out of reach of transparency
laws).
The facts of the case would seem to merit criminal charges
against her, since Clinton’s situation is analogous to problems faced by other
senior officials, including former CIA directors John Deutch and David Petraeus
who were accused of mishandling classified information, Deutch by having secret
material on his home computer and Petraeus for giving notebooks with highly
sensitive information to his lover/biographer.
Deutch agreed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor but was
preemptively pardoned by President Bill Clinton; Petraeus pled guilty to a
misdemeanor in a plea deal that spared him from jail time and was widely
criticized as excessively lenient, especially since the Obama administration
had jailed lower-level officials, such as former CIA officer John Kiriakou, for
similar violations.
⇒ Keep Reading
⇒ Keep Reading
[ I don’t think she
is interested in the life of CIA agents. No creo que
a Hillary le interese la vida de agentes de la CIA .. si normalmente estos
agentes trabajan en las Embajadas USA del mundo .. y una de estas fue demolida
por los terroristas de Libya que ella patrocino .. murió allà el embajador y 4
de sus agentes .. Decir que la Sec de Estado no sabia que allà hubo agente de
la CIA .. eso is ridÃculo .. Es muy posible que estuvo mas interesada en el oro
de Gaddafy y otras fortunas .. además del pago prometido por los Saudis .. que
en la vida del embajador y sus agentes .. Y si es cierto que es el greed lo que mueve a esta “terrorista de Estado” ..
entonces lo que hubo allà fue “criminal negligence”
.. y aun no ha sido encausada por ello. She
should be indicted for this crime too and placed in jail. ]
----
----
NOTICIAS IN SPANISH
----
.. lo que requiere más tino y perseverancia que
la ONU.
----
----
----
Que es blanqueo? Los $USD se fabrican de la nada
.. la DEA es el principal comprador de cocaÃna y usa USD$ .. por tanto no hay
delito .. ni razón para que apresen a nadie .. Quien tiene USD en demasÃa que
regale un poco y se convierte en otro Soros, lo que es muy legal en estándares del
USA.
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Temo prender la luz del techo, gasta
electric y temo aplaste mi Budget ..
.. prefiero prender la lamparita de L
Boff .. es buen espanta-tinieblas
----
----
----
----
----
----
¿Quién puede detener la III Guerra
Mundial? Creo que la lamparita L.Boff
----
----
----
Drop them
in jihadist tunnels in Syria, les ayudara a recordar que esa no es su patria.
Just kiring
----
----
PRESS TV
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario