OBAMA BESIDES HELPING HILLARY, WANTS TO BLACKMAIL SANDERS
President Obama
called Clinton to congratulate her " for securing the delegates necessary to clinch the
Democratic Nomination for President,". Not even DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman
Schultz did so, according to Ben
Kamisar : http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/282651-dnc-avoids-calling-clinton-presumptive-nominee
Thanks to Obama the
FBI has stop their actions. They only said
that “Everything on Clinton is 'evidence' or
'potential evidence' ” Check this FBI:
Everything on Clinton is '... The FBI remains tight-lipped about its
investigation. OPEN:http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/282709-fbi-everything-on-clinton-is-evidence-or-possible-evidence
These Oba-hills don’t worry us.
Our concern is with the call from President Obama to Sanders for a meeting in the White House tomorrow Thursday.
The corp Press said that Obama intention is trying to unite the Democratic
Party?. Does this mean that Sanders has
not the right to work for a 3RD OPTION in
the coming election, so millions of us citizens
disaffected with clinton-trap will have the chance to exercise their citizen
right and soothe anger and agitation
against the billionaires ruling america.
Does President Bush called Obama in the
previous elections for no interfering or for helping him on issues related to
the GOP? . Of course Obama would’ve not accepted such talks? .. SANDERS WON'T DO IT TOO:
1st, because is a matter of leader dignity to reject an invitation that
contains a sign of disrespect to principles
of democratic pluralism in our country.
2nd, because when an authority call a subordinate one to talk on political
issues inside the White House .. the context and relation between talkers is
uneven, unfair and a sign of authoritarian
fascim to do so. It carries implicit an order to be obeyed not matter what.
In ethical, legal & political terms THIS IS CALLED BLACKMAIL.
I don’t think Obama would’ve
accepted such blackmail from Pres Bush , and Sanders won’t do it too. If there is any good intention & purpose
to set a fair dialogue, then DO IT IN FRONT OF THE
PRESS. The Nation do not want his leader be involve in any authoritarian
talk. That will be considered illegal and Sanders has the right to say NO, THANKs.
CERTAINLY, Obama real intention
is to exert serious pressure on Sanders
to bring his challenge for the nomination of Hillary Clinton to a close.
His taking side in favor of her is politically unethical and incorrect. Of course it is, but he
doesn’t matter if another Nobel prize –this time on ethical decency conferred by
the US Nation- is at stake. The FACT is
that the previous Nobel prize on peace carries already an international commendation
to our Presid.
SO WHAT .. he can say. The case is that the time
for impunity is coming to an end. Time is changing fast .. as new political
& economic crisis is approaching. I happens after the WW2 in Europe. Some
criminals were executed by Court order of Nuremberg and in Spain it was the
Nation who execute Franco .. It could
happen again. In fact it is happening in
South America today, some Presidents and top executives involved in such crimes
are placed in jail.
WHO WILL SAY “SO WHAT” THEN AFTER?
.. Just common people from our Nation.
IN SHORT, there is not
ethical basis nor contextual climax to reject Sanders intention of creating a 3rd
option for millions of excluded American from the right to go beyond the
duopoly trap and beyond the corruption of democracy in our country. We have the
right, the reason & the will to do so. Nobody in the White House stopped
any leader to do it, and it will not happen this time.
….
....
IT
IS TIME FOR ACTION IN FAVOR OF A 3RD CHOICE
TIME TO TAKE STREET AND SHOUT LAUDER:
NO TO
DUOPOLY PARTY .. NO HILLARY.. NO TRUMP
HILLARY GO TO
JAIL.. NOR MORE IMPUNITY
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario