IF MISSED MUELLER TESTIMONY IN TV, YOU MISS NOTHING
Hugo adan, 07/24/19
WHY?
1st Because you can get it in RT USA News. READ: “Mueller’s testimony was a major
anti-climax. Will Democrats finally realize he won’t save them? “ OPEN
https://www.rt.com/usa/464984-mueller-testimony-democrats
OR
Sputniknews.com READ: “Robert
Mueller special councel gives ‘disoriented’ Russiagate testimony” OPEN: https://sputniknews.com/201907241076350484-robert-mueller-special-councel-gives-disoriented-russiagate-tetimony/via
...
2nd Because Mueller bumbled
through most answers in the first part (he even forgot things included
in his written testimony -Did he write it or just memory problem?- When a person asked which President nominate
him Attorney General, he did not remember either.. IS this man too old to be in
the position he has now?. Many 74 years old men may have memory problems .. but
not so bad. SO, Is this the right time for Trump to dismiss him or ask his resignation & install a new committee:
half Dems half Reps? May be.
One more thing: the 18 members- team
that work for Mueller is totally sided & pro-Hillary Clinton. His
advisor during this testimony belong to
that side too. In short, the Mueller testimony did not gives any new light on expected issue Russiagate.. that supposed to
be the central point in his testimony. He show not interest on placing any “charge” on Trump assumed “collusion”
with RU to still the Presidency Election in 2016. That ‘charge’ could have been enough to indict
Trump and proceed to impeach him as soon
he finished his pimer round in power. At
the end of first round of testimony Mueller said “he is not prosecutor to exonerate
any one from any crime”.
3rd When a person ask
Mueller if his testimony is a total exoneration to Trump. He answer NO. So, Trump won’t
be charged but won’t be exonerated either. What kind of policy is this?. Could
you give an example of this policy before in the US?. He couldn’t answer immediately, saying he is
not prosecutor is not enough. The only
situation that could explain the
contradiction “not charge” vs. “not exoneration” is because an investigated
person is innocent until conclusive evidence to be charged of any crime. This
is a “unique situation”.
4th The other side of the coin: TRUMP REJECT MUELLER TESTIMONY. This is the greatest Witch hunt in US History by far. When Mueller testify into possible ties between
Trump campaign and RU showed NO evidence of “conspiracy”
and “collusion” –terms that for Mueller are “largely synonymous”- since not evidence, the
Dems shifted to “obstruction of justice” implying
that Trump obstructed Mueller’ prove and
requested time for additional investigation. The idea that pressing Mueller to
present his testimony is the proof Mueller has for “obstruction
of justice”.
It Is more than 2 years and Trump demands Muller to investigate the investigators. Why 18 angry democrat’s
expend time investigating the crocked Hillary
Clinton , James Comey, Lisa Page & her psycho lover Peter Stevzok, Andy
McCAbe.. it on those reports that Mueller build his RU-Trump collusion investigation.
That is totally sided & illegal investigation. Dems are illegally
fabricating a crime. CHECK:
TRUMP ANSWER in: http://www.rt.com/usa/464954-trump
. CHECK ALSO Sputnik news –the truth is a force of nature- at: http://sputniknews.com/201907241076350484-robert-mumbler-special-council-gives-disoriented-rusiagate-testimony/via
Enjoy
Hugo Adan, 07/24/19
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario