lunes, 17 de noviembre de 2014

EL CAPITALISMO NEOLIBERAL y PARASITARIO ES OBSOLETO



EL CAPITALISMO NEOLIBERAL y PARASITARIO ES OBSOLETO

INTRODUCCIÓN por Hugo Adan , Nov 17, 2014

En la 1ra parte of “Basic Concepts to Understand our crisis” (http://nd-hugoadan.blogspot.com/2014/11/basic-concepts-to-understand-our-econ.html)  indicamos que el sistema capitalista tiene 4 características: (a) producción de bienes y servicios para el Mercado, (b) si y solo si eso rinde ganancias (acumulables y convertibles en capital), lo que implica (c)  reducir salarios y (d) respetar las reglas de libre competencia (lo que originalmente suponía prohibir los monopolios, regla jamás respetada).  Se trataba entonces de un sistema de explotación (c) supuestamente basado en la libre competencia (free market). Digo “Se trataba” porque hoy lo que predomina es un nuevo capitalismo que mescla socialismo “welfarista” con empresas privadas reguladas  por el Estado y donde se negocia el salario entre la empresa y trabajadores sobre la bases de mínimos de Ley.  

Indicamos también que si se considera la libre competencia como principal rasgo del sistema, tenemos 4 tipos de capitalismo históricamente existentes:  

(a) el periodo de competencia salvaje llamado laissez-faire

(b) el capitalismo social-democrático, asistencial o welfare capitalism, orientado a reducir la explosiva desigualdad que crea la “libre competencia”  mediante instituciones y políticas de Estado (educación y salud gratuitas, seguro por desempleo y vejez,  asistencia a derechos de la mujer y el niño y apoyos para techo y comida) ; 

(c) crony capitalism que asume como normal la diferencia de riqueza y poder  y como normal la relación cliente-patrón heredada de tiempos feudales (clientelismo), solo que ahora el cliente es la clase trabajadora  que compra favores, bienes y servicios  y el patrón es la clase empresarial que compra votos, soborna ejecutivos  y vende favores a través de intermediarios (los lobistas). Se trata del capitalismo “de libre corrupción” donde aquellas compras son “ilegales” pero realmente permitidas.   

(d) capitalismo de Estado y/o de  mixed economy  donde se admite el libre competencia y libertad empresarial pero sin que afecte los “bienes  comunes” de la nación (seguridad pública y nacional, estándares básicos de educación y salud para todos, protección de bienes colectivos como ambiente ecológico, agua y recursos naturales estratégicos). Estos modelos  combinan el capitalismo welfarista con el Estado como gestor empresarial (Los SOEs o empresas de propiedad estatal) y con empresas mixtas donde el Estado y la inversión privada van de la mano. Esta mescla es vista como fase transitoria hacia un nuevo capitalismo y/o hacia un nuevo socialismo. Es lo que se practica en los paises nórdicos de Europa (Alemania, Dinamarca, Finlandia, Islandia, Noruega y Suecia) y lo que se practica también en Rusia y China (los paises donde predominan los SOEs). Ambos 2 modelos son  la tendencia más prospera en términos económicos  en la actualidad.

Lo que ahora haremos es discutir la propuesta de Adam Smith, llamado laissez-faire que aún sigue siendo motivo de debate interno entre los partidarios de Ludwig von Mises y  Friedrich von Hayek dentro del capitalismo nórdico, (the Austrian Model) el más avanzado de Europa, de lo que hablaremos en el próximo envío.

LAS RAÍCES DEL LAISSEZ-FAIRE  (LIBRE COMPETENCIA EMPRESARIAL) DE ADAM SMITH

Philosophical base: The utilitarian view of Bentham & J.S.Mill (indirectly from T.Hobbes, D.Hume & J.Locke) on human existence. According to this view, individuals are motivated by rational-self-interest, seeking pleasure and happiness and avoiding pain & unhappiness, that  was the basic ideology of the emerging capitalism. This ideology lead the break of merchants with the brutal medieval times of feudal lords and religious dogmas. When individuals act in their own rational self-interest, the end will be a capitalist system in which the greatest good for the largest number will be assured, Bentham & Mill promised.

Adam Smith brought this false promise to the realm of economics. Let the businessmen alone, was his suggestion, let them compete each other savagely, let it do It, let the survival of the fittest prevail, take the State hands out of them; at the end , this competition will assure goods and services in abundance for everybody. At the end  all people will benefit from this abundance and they will pay the price they are willing to pay, consumer sovereignty will prevail.  That summarizes all principles and ideology known in France and Scotland (Smith’s nation) as “laissez-faire”.

Smith of course thought that some public goods should be in the hand of the State, like education, health, public and Nat security and other public goods. Don’t let them in the hands of the new cannibals; let the state take care of it, that was his message. Even though,  when “laissez-faire”  become the rule of the game,  when the new-jungle know as capitalism was set, they didn’t care for public education ..  

The assumption was that the market alone can regulate themselves. But it never happens, the unregulated market brought economic instabilities that the managers of the system manage to cope with until the WWI explode. In the aftermath of this war, the winners imposed they rule and the system was untouched. Adam Smith’ unregulated market and his jungle rule known as “laissez-faire”- got its final day in "The depression of 1929 originated in the U.S. with a fall in stock market prices that began in Sept 4, 1929, and became worldwide crisis with the stock market crash of October 29, 1929 (known as Black Tuesday). Visible signs of depression were:   Personal income, tax revenue, profits and prices dropped, while international trade plunged by more than 50%. Unemployment in the U.S. rose to 25%, and in some countries rose as high as 33%. For a brief description of what happens in the U.S. at that time see a NOTE below.  The effects of this capitalistic crisis probed that market self-regulation does not exist. During this crisis big corporation merge and get extra-profits. For common people the great depression' effects were worse that the effects of WWI.

The evilness of capitalist rulers came back, they learn that wars can be converted into profitable business too.

Franklin D Roosevelt introduced the correction to the “free-market” cannibalism with the New Deal and the Glass-Steagal Act (GSA, 1933) though he didn’t do much- to spread the GSA to the rest of the world. However, his ideas for a single World currency backed by gold  -the cornerstone in the Breton Woods of 1944- was in that direction. In the aftermath of WWII Neo-imperialism became rampant, war became a profitable business, the dollar became a fiat in 1971,  and in the mid of the 1980, the old rules of capitalist cannibalism known as “laissez-faire” was imposed back by Reagan-Thatcher,  this time at international level.  

We are now at the beginning of a new world recession and instead of re-defining the Glass-Steagall of FDR. our leaders are thinking in making business with a new war, the nuclear one. The evilness of capitalist profiteers did not  abandoned the self-rational interest of Benathal and Mill. This  time their followers  won’t claim that nuclear war will bring the greatest happiness and pleasure for all, not even for American-London bankers and its multinational corporation. Nuclear war will not bring the greatest good for the largest number, capitalism never did it and with nuclear war they will bring just the opposite, the greatest destruction for all humanity. That is a brief history of capitalism, a system that became obsolete and dangerous nowadays.    

======   

NOTE: 



A brief description of what happens in the U.S. in 1929 is given by :   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression :  life in cities dependent on heavy industry were severely hit: building construction (part of big projects) stopped; construction of equipment and the car industry also stopped, and the same happens to manufacturers of aerospace products and defense armaments.  Farming and rural areas suffered as crop prices fell by approximately 60%. Areas depending   on primary sector industries such as cash cropping, mining and logging suffered the most. All of this happens because the demand felt due to few alternative sources of jobs. In fact, economic recession preceded the great depression (inflation and deflation plus the injection of liquidity (printing money: QES) creates economic bubbles and volatility typical of capitalist systems.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depression_%28economics%29  and  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression   In some places the negative effects of the Great Depression lasted until after the end of World War II.
 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario