THE DANGERS OF A THIRD WORLD WAR
IS REAL
FROM
Posted on August 27, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog
By professor Michel Chossudovsky of Global
Research.
While this renewed East-West confrontation has mistakenly
been labelled a “New Cold War”, none of the safeguards of The Cold War era
prevail. International diplomacy has collapsed. Russia has been excluded from
the Group of Eight (G-8), which has reverted to the G-7 (Group of Seven
Nations). There is no “Cold War East-West dialogue” between competing
superpowers geared towards avoiding military confrontation. In turn, the United
Nations Security Council has become a de facto mouthpiece of the U.S. State
Department.
US-NATO will not, however, be able to win a conventional war
against Russia, with the danger that military confrontation will lead to a
nuclear war.
In the post-Cold war era, however, nuclear weapons are no
longer considered as a “weapon of last resort” under the Cold War
doctrine of “Mutual Assured Destruction” (MAD). Quite the opposite.
nuclear weapons are heralded by the Pentagon as “harmless to the surrounding
civilian population because the explosion is underground”. In 2002, the U.S.
Senate gave the green light for the use of nuclear weapons in the conventional
war theater. Nukes are part of the “military toolbox” to be used
alongside conventional weapons.
When war becomes peace, the world is turned upside
down. In a bitter irony, nukes are now upheld by Washington as
“instruments of peace”.
In addition to nuclear weapons, the use of chemical weapons
is also envisaged.
Methods of non-conventional warfare are also contemplated by
US-NATO including financial warfare, trade sanctions, covert ops, cyberwarfare,
geoengineering and environmental modification technologies (ENMOD). But Russia
also has extensive capabilities in these areas.
Western leaders in High office
are Involved in a Criminal Undertaking which Threatens the Future of Humanity
The timeline towards war with Russia has been set. The Wales
NATO venue on September 4-5, 2014 is of crucial importance.
What we are dealing with is a World War III Scenario, which
is the object of the Wales NATO Summit, hosted by Britain’s Prime Minister
David Cameron. The agenda of this meeting has already been set by Washington,
NATO and the British government. It requires, according to PM David Cameron in
a letter addressed to heads of State and heads of government of NATO member
states ahead of the Summit that:
“Leaders [of NATO countries] must review NATO’s
long term relationship with Russia at the summit in response to Russia’s illegal
actions in Ukraine. And the PM wants to use the summit to agree how NATO
will sustain a robust presence in Eastern Europe in the coming months to
provide reassurance to allies there, building on work already underway in
NATO.” (See PM writes to
NATO leaders ahead of NATO Summit Wales 2014)
IT IS ESSENTIAL TO
UNDERMINE THE “MILITARY TIMELINE”, NAMELY TO:
1) block the holding of the upcoming NATO Summit meeting at
the Celtic Manor Resort, Newport, Wales (SEE
image in the website above ) on September 4-5, through political pressure and
mass protest. The objective of this NATO venue, is to “build a political
consensus” for a war directed against the Russian Federation, which could
potentially lead the World into a Third World War. It is therefore essential to
break this “political consensus”.
2) In addition to the 28 NATO member states, represented by
their respective heads of State and heads of government, NATO “partner”
countries will also be represented. In
all, the governments of 60 countries will be in attendance. It is therefore
crucial to initiate a vast Worldwide antiwar campaign in all 60 countries to
stall the NATO Summit meeting in Wales.*
3) block the adoption of the “The Russian Aggression
Prevention Act” (RAPA) in the US Congress, through pressure on senators and
members of Congress, it should be understood that the text of the NATO Summit
communique (which already exists in draft form) is broadly similar to that of “The
Russian Aggression Prevention Act”. RAPA is currently blocked at the committee
level. Whether it is adopted or not, the substance of the proposed
legislation is what is important because it sets the stage for establishing
a ”political consensus”.
4) initiate a broad anti-war debate and protest movement
throughout the US and NATO member states.
5) undermine the legitimacy of the US-NATO-Israel military
agenda through counter-propaganda directed against mainstream media coverage;
World public opinion must be made aware of these
impending war plans.
Spread the word far and wide.
Note
*Further details: Summit
Meeting of NATO Heads of State and Government, Newport, Wales, United Kingdom –
4-5 September 2014
=========
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario