TODAY'S RESERVE
CURRENCY = TOMORROW'S WALLPAPER [+ war ahead]
By Bill Bonner . Saturday,
11 January 2014 18:09
Bonner & Partners
http://www.bonnerandpartners.com/author/billbonner/#.UtcuEfvEuxM
Somehow, like it or not, the world turns. Today's hegemon
becomes tomorrow's also-ran. Today's reserve currency becomes tomorrow's
wallpaper. Today's cock o' the walk becomes tomorrow's dinner.
Hey, we didn't create this system. We don't even especially
like it. But that's just the way it is. We'll come back to this in a minute.
First, let's just note that Wednesday's markets were losers for just about
everyone. The Dow lost 68 points. Gold was down $4 an ounce.
Now, back to our thoughts on money – the same thoughts,
incidentally, we're having at Bonner & Partners Family Office, the family
wealth advisory service my eldest son, Will, and I set up back in 2009 to help
families hold onto … and pass on … their wealth.
Whether you already have made a fortune, or are trying to
build one, you need to be very careful about what currency … or currencies …
your wealth in denominated in.
THE END OF HISTORY?
Governments were set up to take control. Ruling elites – by
force of arms – established laws, protocols and armies to try to prevent anyone
from taking their place. Their wealth,
power and status were to be preserved – at all cost. But in the 18th and 19th
centuries, firearms started to become ubiquitous. It was harder for elites to
maintain their authority over the masses.
Every farmer on the American frontier had a rifle. A rag-tag
band of insurgents in the American colonies (with the help of the French Navy)
could defeat the best army in the world. An out-of-work actor could buy a
handgun and pop off a president.
Unable to stay in control by force alone, governments had to
resort to fraud. Ordinary citizens were allowed to vote on who would rule over
them. They were also promised the fruits of others' labors, if they voted the
right way. For a time, it looked as though this new model – social democracies
run by flaming politicians and professional functionaries – had defeated all
rivals.
The Soviet Union – which had relied on more old-fashioned
blunt force to run its slave-driven economy – capitulated in 1989. Maoist China
had thrown in the towel, more or less, 10 years earlier when the country's
"paramount leader," Deng Xiaoping, announced, "To get rich is
glorious." (Historians now claim he never uttered those words. But the
phrase accurately captured his vision for China.) And Francis Fukuyama –
hallucinating – wondered if the "end of history" was at hand.
If the end of history
were at hand, the dollar, the Fed and federal finances would have nothing to
worry about. But between history and the greenback, if we were taking bets,
we'd put our money on history. Most likely, history will trundle forward. And
the renminbi will join (or replace) the dollar as the world's leading currency
sometime before the 21st century comes to a close. But how, exactly, will that
happen? No one knows … but few imperial elites give up the No. 1 position
without a fight. As they see their power, their status and their wealth
challenged, they typically find a casus belli, hoping to stomp the newcomer
before it is too late.
THUCYDIDES' TRAP
The phenomenon is known to historians as the
"Thucydides' Trap." Political scientist Graham Allison explains:
“When a rapidly rising power rivals an
established ruling power, trouble ensues. In 11 of 15 cases in which this has
occurred in the past 500 years, the result was war. The great Greek historian
Thucydides identified these structural stresses as the primary cause of the war
between Athens and Sparta in ancient Greece. In his oft-quoted insight,
"It was the rise of Athens and the fear that this inspired in Sparta that
made war inevitable."
Note that Thucydides identified two factors: a rising rival
and fear of that rise. China is rising. The US power elite fears its rise. And
for good reason. Having the world's reserve currency is an "exorbitant
privilege," as Charles de Gaulle described it. It allows Americans to buy
things from overseas without ever really paying for them. Instead, we send over
pieces of paper. That paper is then held in foreign vaults as reserves. Or it
is lent back to us.
From an economic point of view, the system (established by
Richard Nixon in 1971) is loopy. The Chinese pretend they have good customers.
Americans pretend they have good credit. And everyone pretends to get richer …
based on promises to settle up sometime in the future.
In practice, nobody wants the day of reckoning to come.
Because they all know that there are vastly more claims on tomorrow's output
than tomorrow can satisfy. Between 1971 and today, roughly $10 trillion more
has been received by Americans in goods from overseas than has been shipped to
foreigners. That money is an outstanding claim on US existing wealth and future
output.
There is also (with some overlap) about $17 trillion worth
of US government debt … also a claim on future American output. And this is
just part of the total credit market debt of $55 trillion. (Not to mention the
feds' unfunded liabilities.)
To pay off these claims, the US would have to run a surplus.
(When? How?) But instead of running a surplus, we run deficits. The federal
government's deficit, for example, is expected to be $744 billion this year.
And the current account deficit is running at about $500 billion. Neither is
near a surplus.
EDGING TOWARD A RECKONING
Instead of edging toward a reckoning, all major governments
seem to want to make the situation worse. The US stimulates its people to buy
more Chinese-made goods. And China stimulates its manufacturers to make more
stuff for people who can't really afford it. Both are heading for trouble.
Americans are hooked on spending. They consume their wealth
… and more. China is hooked on producing. As it adds productive know-how and
capacity, it becomes more and more competitive. Not only can it produce more
consumer output at lower prices, but also it can produce the latest in military
hardware. It's a matter of time before that fighting gear comes out. At least,
that's what history suggests.
IF THERE IS A MILITARY CONFLICT, HOW WILL IT TURN OUT?
The US spends three times more than China on "defense."
Advantage: Pentagon. But as the Persians discovered in their wars with
the Greeks, having the biggest, best-funded army does not necessarily give you
an edge. Instead, it invites sluggishness, complacency and overreaching.
The US military is arguably the fattest, most
zombie-infested bureaucracy in the world. It suffers from an overabundance of
resources. It supports troops (at a cost of $1 million per soldier per year)
all over the globe. It builds weapons systems that are often obsolete before
they are put into service. It coddles armies of lobbyists, contractors,
consultants, retirees, hangers-on and malingerers. Like all bureaucracies, it
looks out first and foremost for itself. Looking out for the security of the nation
is a distant second.
Its 11 huge aircraft carriers, for example, may be marvelous
ways to generate contracts, fees and expenses. They may also be great ways to
throw US military muscle into two-bit conflicts around the world. But put them
up against a modern, electronically-sophisticated enemy … Then what?
We will probably find
out …
------------
RELATED ARTICLES
Ben Bernanke On Money
and the Sophistry of Modern Monetary Theory. http://www.brotherjohnf.com/archives/256983
WILL CHINA MAKE THE YUAN A GOLD-BACKED CURRENCY? Submitted by
George Washington on 05/22/2012
INVESTING IN
CURRENCIES WWW.Wallstreetdaily.com/ Free-Report The Dollar And Euro Are Doomed.
These 3 Currencies Will Take Over http://signups.wallstreetdaily.com/X303P794
CHINA EXPANDS MILITARY "WITH PEACE IN MIND" Jan
15 2014 http://news.silobreaker.com/china-expands-military-with-peace-in-mind-5_2267665844857208837
CHINA TESTED HYPERSONIC MISSILE VEHICLE US OFFICIALS By West Australian Wed 15th January, 2014 Washington (AFP) - China for the first time has tested a hypersonic missile vehicle designed to travel several times the speed of sound, the Pentagon said on Wednesday. http://news.silobreaker.com/china-tested-hypersonic-missile-vehicle-us-officials-5_2267667174149587035
===========
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario