THE TIME LINE OF THE US AGRESSION
ON SYRIA by Tony Cartalucci
In case you miss it. The writing in brackets is my. [Haz]
US PLANNED SYRIAN CIVILIAN CATASTROPHE SINCE 2007 Published
On: Wed, Sep 4th, 2013 Geo-Politics / Middle East | By nsnbc Published in Sept 4-13 by nsnbc.me
Tony Cartalucci (LD) , - NBC
News’ report, “‘The great tragedy of this century’: More than 2 million
refugees forced out of Syria,” He stated:
1991: Paul Wolfowitz, then Undersecretary of Defense, tells US Army General Wesley Clark that the US has 5-10 years to “clean up those old Soviet client regimes, Syria, Iran, Iraq, before the next great superpower comes on to challenge us.” FORA.TV: Wesley Clark at the Commonwealth Club of California, October 3, 2007.
2001: A classified plot is revealed to US Army General Wesley Clark that the US plans to attack and destroy the governments of 7 nations: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. FORA.TV: Wesley Clark at the Commonwealth Club of California, October 3, 2007.
2002: US Under Secretary of State John Bolton declares Syria a member of the “Axis of Evil” and warned that “the US would take action.” Source BBC: “US Expands ‘Axis of Evil’” May 6, 2002.
2005: US State Department’s National Endowment for Democracy organizes and implements the “Cedar Revolution” in Lebanon directly aimed at undermining Syrian-Iranian influence in Lebanon in favor of Western-backed proxies, most notably Saad Hariri’s political faction. Source: Counterpunch: “Faking the Case Against Syria,” by Trish Schuh November 19-20, 2005.
2005: Ziad Abdel Nour, an associate of Bush Administration advisers, policy makers, and media including Neo-Conservatives Paula Dobriansky, James Woolsey, Frank Gaffney, Daniel Pipes, Joseph Farah (World Net Daily), Clifford May, and Daniel Nassif of US State Department-funded Al Hurra and Radio Sawa, admits: “Both the Syrian and Lebanese regimes will be changed- whether they like it or not- whether it’s going to be a military coup or something else… and we are working on it. We know already exactly who’s going to be the replacements. We’re working on it with the Bush administration.” Counterpunch: “Faking the Case Against Syria,” by Trish Schuh November 19-20-05.
2006: Israel attempts, and fails, to destroy Hezbollah in Lebanon after a prolonged aerial bombard that resulted in thousands of civilian deaths. Source CNN: “UN: Hezbollah and Israel agree on Monday cease-fire,” August 13, 2006.
2007: Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker reveals that US, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Hariri in Lebanon as well as the Syrian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood were assembling, arming, training, and heavily funding a sectarian extremists front, many of whom had direct ties to Al Qaeda, to unleash in both Lebanon and Syria. The goal was to create and exploit a sectarian divide between Sunni and Shi’ia Muslims. Hersh interviewed intelligence officers who expressed concerns over the “cataclysmic conflict” that would result, and the need to protect ethnic minorities from sectarian atrocities. The report indicated that extremists would be logistically staged in northern Lebanon where they would be able to cross back and forth into Syria. Source New Yorker: “The Redirection,” by Seymour Hersh, March 5, 2007.
2008: The US State Department begins training, funding, networking, and equipping “activists” through its “Alliance for Youth Movements” where the future protest leaders of the “Arab Spring,” including Egypt’s “April 6 Movement” were brought to New York, London, and Mexico, before being trained by US-funded CANVAS in Serbia, and then returning home to begin preparations for 2011. Source: Land Destroyer: “2011 – Year of the Dupe,” December 24, 2011.
2009: The Brookings Institution published a report titled, “Which Path to Persia?” (.pdf), which admits that the Bush Administration “evicted” Syria from Lebanon without building up a strong Lebanese government to replace it (p. 34), that Israel struck a “nascent” Syrian nuclear program, and states the importance of neutralizing Syrian influence before any attack on Iran can be carried out (p. 109). The report then goes on to describe in detail the use of listed terrorist organizations against the government of Iran, in particular the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) (p. 126) and Baluch insurgents in Pakistan (p.132). Brookings Institution: “Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy Toward Iran,” June 2009.
2010-11: In an April 2011 AFP report, Michael Posner, the assistant US Secretary of State for Human Rights and Labor, admitted that the “US government has budgeted $50 million in the last two years to develop new technologies to help activists protect themselves from arrest and prosecution by authoritarian governments.” [However a member of April 6 mov in Egipt was imprisoned and tortured by Mubarak regime thanks to Hillary Clinton leaking. This news was uncovered by wikileaks. See my time-line on Egypt. HAZ in http://nuevademocracia.xanga.com/archives/]
The AFP report went on to admit that the US (emphasis added) “organized training sessions for 5,000 activists in different parts of the world. A session held in the Middle East about six weeks ago gathered activists from Tunisia, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon who returned to their countries with the aim of training their colleagues there.” Posner would add, “They went back and there’s a ripple effect.” Source AFP: “US Trains Activists to Evade Security Forces,” April 8, 2011.
2011: Posner’s US trained, funded, and equipped activists return
to their respective countries across the Arab World to begin their “ripple
effect.”: Protests, vandalism , and arson sweep across Syria and
“rooftop snipers” begin attacking both protesters and Syrian
security forces, just as Western-backed movements were documented doing in
Bangkok, Thailand one year earlier. With a similar gambit already unfolding
in Libya, US senators begin threatening Syria with long planned
and sought after military intervention. Source: Land Destroyer: “Syria: Intervention Inevitable,” April 29,
2011.
2012: With NATO’s Libyan intervention resulting in a weak US-backed
Tripoli client-regime, perpetual infighting, nationwide genocide, and the succession of Benghazi in the east, the NATO-backed Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), listed by
the US State Department as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (listed
#27) begins mobilizing weapons, cash, and fighters to begin
destabilizing Syria. Headed by LIFG’s Abdul Hakim Belhaj, this would be the
first confirmed presence of Al Qaeda in Syria, flush with NATO weapons and
cash. The Washington Post would confirm, just as stated by Hersh
in 2007, that the US and Saudi Arabia were arming the sectarian extremists,
now labeled the “Free Syrian Army.” The Post also admits that the Syrian Muslim
Brotherhood, as stated in Hersh’s 2007 report, was also involved in arming and
backing extremist fighters. Land Destroyer: “US Officially Arming Extremists in Syria,” May
16, 2012.
2012: The US policy think-tank Brookings Institution in its
Middle East Memo #21 ”Assessing Options for Regime Change (.pdf),” admits
that it does not seek any negotiated ceasefire under the UN’s “Kofi Annan peace
plan” that leaves Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in power and would rather
arm militants, even with the knowledge they will never succeed, to
“bleed” the government, “keeping a regional adversary weak, while avoiding the
costs of direct intervention.” This reveals that US policy does not view US
interference in Syria as a moral imperative predicated on defending human
rights, but rather using this false predication to couch aspirations of
regional hegemony. Source Land Destroyer: “US Brookings Wants to “Bleed” Syria to Death,”
May 28, 2012.
And, just this year, it was revealed
that despite the West’s feigned military and political paralysis regarding the
Syrian conflict, the US and Great Britain have been covertly funding and arming
sectarian extremists to the tune of billions of dollars and arming them with literally thousands of tons of weaponry.
Despite claims of “carefully vetting” “moderate” militant factions, the
prominence of Al Qaeda-linked extremist groups indicates that the majority of
Western support, laundered through Qatar and Saudi Arabia, is being purposefully
put into the hands of the very sectarian extremists identified in Seymour
Hersh’s 2007 article, “The Redirection.”
US Created and is Now Using Syrian
Catastrophe to Justify Intervention
The non-debate taking place now to
justify US military intervention in a conflict they themselves started and have
intentionally perpetuated, is whether chemical weapons were used in Damascus on
August 21, 2013 – not even “who” deployed them. The weakness of the US’
argument has seen an unprecedented backlash across both the world’s populations
and the global diplomatic community. And despite only 9% of the American public supporting a military
intervention in Syria, Congress appears poised to not only green-light
“limited strikes,” but may approve of a wider military escalation. [It didn't happens yet. HAZ]
In Seymour Hersh’s 2007 New Yorker
article, “The Redirection,” Robert Baer, a former CIA agent in
Lebanon, warned of the sectarian bloodbath the US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia were
planning to unleash. He stated:
“we’ve got Sunni Arabs preparing for
cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the Christians in
Lebanon. It used to be the French and the United States who would do it, and
now it’s going to be Nasrallah and the Shiites”
[STATE PARTITIONS AHEAD Haz]
Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan
Nasrallah, also featured in Hersh’s report, would in turn also warn of an
imminent and spreading sectarian war purposefully stoked by the West:
Nasrallah said he believed that
President Bush’s goal was “the drawing of a new map for the region. They want
the partition of Iraq. Iraq is not on the edge of a civil war—there is a
civil war. There is ethnic and sectarian cleansing. The daily killing and
displacement which is taking place in Iraq aims at achieving three Iraqi parts,
which will be sectarian and ethnically pure as a prelude to the partition of
Iraq. Within one or two years at the most, there will be total Sunni areas,
total Shiite areas, and total Kurdish areas. Even in Baghdad, there is a fear
that it might be divided into two areas, one Sunni and one Shiite.”
He went on, “I can say that
President Bush is lying when he says he does not wanted Iraq to be partitioned.
All the facts occurring now on the ground make you swear he is dragging Iraq to
partition. And a day will come when he will say, ‘I cannot do anything, since
the Iraqis want the partition of their country and I honor the wishes of the
people of Iraq.’ ”
Nasrallah said he believed that
America also wanted to bring about the partition of Lebanon and of Syria. In
Syria, he said, the result would be to push the country “into chaos and
internal battles like in Iraq.” In Lebanon, “There will be a Sunni state, an
Alawi state, a Christian state, and a Druze state.” But, he said, “I do not
know if there will be a Shiite state.”
It would be difficult for anyone to
look across the scarred landscape of today’s Syria and not see that this
horrific conspiracy was realized in full. The Western media is now acquainting the public with the
possibility of a partitioned Syria, echoing the warnings of Nasrallah years
ago. The goals of a US military strike would be to “degrade” the capabilities
of the Syrian government, while bolstering the terrorist legions still
operating within and along Syria’s borders".
The attacks on Syria are not
humanitarian by any measure. They are simply the latest stage of a long-running
plan to divide and destroy the region, leaving the West the sole regional
hegemonic power.
--------------
==================
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario