by Thierry Meyssan
MY
INTRODUCTION.
Hugo Adan. Marzo 6-18
NOTHING
TO CELEBRATE
No hay nada que celebrar con El bipolarismo: este
puede ser un paso seguro a la hecatombe mundial si los dos polos se vuelven a excluir
mañana como lo quiso hoy el expansionismo unipolarista del US. La unica diferencia es que el
poder absoluto de uno de los polos ha desaparecido, pero no las contradicciones
que dieron base al conflicto anterior. Al
parecer lo absoluto ( indeterminado, incondicionado) no existe. Es decir, hemos ingresado a una etapa de relativismo transitorio
donde los dos ejes de la contradicción logran un balance de fuerza y energias
que permite la co-existaencia entre ambos dos polos (una especie de respeto
transitorio a la teoria MAD –o auto-destruccion
asegurada- si ocurre la 3ra guerra mundial ).
Pero el solo hecho de que en esta relación entre lo absoluto y lo
relativo existen las contradicciones que originaron la
crisis enterior, no es ninguna garantía de que la crisis y auto-destruccion del
globo vuelva a re-aparecer en un futuro próximo y con mayor fuerza aun.
Se trata por tanto de asegurar hoy la PAZ
DEFINITIVA lo que supone superar los errores cometidos cuando se intentó
el DESMONTAJE NUCLEAR anteriomente. Los duenios del poder en nuestra nación
burlaron esa fe mundial. Los rusos en cambio dieron prueba de su fe en la paz
cuando lanzaron el SPUTNIK, lo que bien pudo ser usado para atacar al USA. Hoy
tienen ellos la supremacía militar y podrían usarla para desaparecer el US y su
NATO, pero necesitan un programa claro de reconstrucción mundial que vaya mas
alla del desastre neoliberal actual. Se necesita
combinar lo mas avanzado del capitalismo y socialismo sin hacer la mas
minima concesión a las grandes corporaciones multinacionales y en especial a los
del Military Industrial Complex en el USA.
Por esto le pedimos a los Rusos que inicien la demanda global por el DESMONTAJE NUCLEAR HOY.
Los de aquí y sus aliados en NATO no lo van a hacer. Hiroshima y Nagazaki
indicaron que a los duenios del poder en el oeste no les importa la PAZ mundial, solo les
importa seguir encebandose con la gula neoliberal actual. Es este modelo
obsoleto lo que esta causando mucha miseria y destrucción en el mundo actual,
Este modelo se basa en el chantaje nuclear y el negocio las guerras en la periferia mundial. En suma: No solo se requiere el DESMONTAJE NUCLEAR, se requiere también
y sobre todo el DESMONTAJE NEOLIBERAL.
….
….
by Thierry Meyssan
We’re back to square
one – the world is once again bipolar. The
United States, certain of their superiority, never imagined the rebirth of Russian
military capability.
In the second quarter of 2012, Russia and its allies agreed to
deploy a peace force in Syria as soon as the Geneva agreement was concluded.
But
everything changed when France rebooted the war in July 2012. Although Russia had obtained recognition by
the UNO of the Collective Security Treaty Organization in order to deploy
Muslim soldiers, mainly from Kazakhstan, nothing was happening. Despite the
calls for help from Damascus, Moscow remained silent for a long time. It was
only three years later that the Russian Air Force arrived, and bombed the
jihadists’ underground installations.
During the
three years that followed, there were many military incidents which opposed
Russia to the United States. For
example, the Pentagon complained about the strange aggressivity of Russian
bombers which approached the US coast. In Damascus, we sought an explanation
for Moscow’s silence, and asked ourselves if Russia had forgotten its
engagements. None of that was true. Russia was
secretly building a new arsenal, and moved in only when it was ready.
From the
beginning of its intervention, the Russian army installed a system which did
not simply scramble NATO commands, but disconnected them within a range of 300
kilometres around Lattakia. Thereafter, it deployed the same system in the Black Sea and
at Kaliningrad. Apart from their new aircraft, Russia used cruise
missiles which were more accurate than those of the USA, fired by the navy from
the Caspian Sea. Last month, on the battle field, it tested multi-purpose
planes with capacities as yet unknown.
It has
become clear, according to US generals on the ground, that the Russian army now
has conventional forces which are more efficient than those of the USA. However, their Pentagon counterparts still
have their doubts about this progression, so sure are they of remaining
militarily superior for all eternity. According to them, it is simply
ridiculous to compare the two armies, since theirs has a budget eight times
greater than the Russians. Yet never in all of military science has the
performance of two rival armies been compared by the amount of their budgets, a
fact that Vladimir Putin pointed out by noting the exceptional quality of his
soldiers compared with those of the United States.
In any case, while
the Russians are a little better in matters of conventional warfare, they are
unable to deploy on several theaters of operation simultaneously, while
Washington conserves its nuclear superiority.
The entry
into war, on 24 February 2018, of the Russian infantry in the Ghouta, is certainly the consequence of an
agreement with the United States, who have agreed to halt their investment in
Syria and therefore not to reproduce the strategies of harassment that they
used against the Red Army in Afghanistan. It is also the sign that the Pentagon now fears that the Russian army could possibly
give them a taste of their own medicine, elsewhere in the world.
It was
precisely at this moment that President Putin chose to contest US nuclear
superiority. Duirng his speech
before his Parliament, on 1 March 2018, he announced that his country is in
possession of a terrifying nuclear arsenal.
All these programmes
have been more or less known for years, but the experts believed they would not
be operational for a long time. However, most of them
now are. We have to ask ourselves how the Russian were able to prepare them all
without the US Intelligence Services finding out. And yet that’s exactly
what they were able to do with the Su-57, which they tested in combat three
weeks ago, while the CIA believed that it would not be ready until 2025. And
yet that’s exactly what they were able to do with the Su-57, which they tested
in combat three weeks ago, while the CIA believed that it would not be ready
until 2025.
See
VIDEO on Missile
Sarmate
Vladimir Putin has revealed his new
arsenal. The intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) Sarmate (from the
name of an antique Russian people for whom men and women were equals), re-uses
the « orbital head » technique which had already ensured Russian superiority
during the 1970’s. The USSR abandoned this programme by signing and ratifying
the SALT II agreements. However, the US Senate never ratified the Treaty, which
made it null and void. With this type of missile, the warhead is placed into
orbit, then re-enters the atmosphere and dives onto its target, with an
unlimited range of action. The Treaties prohibiting the nuclearisation of space
forbid the placing of a nuclear charge into permanent orbit, but not entering
space during a part of its trajectory. At our current state of knowledge, it
can not be intercepted during this period. The Sarmate
can suddenly appear in the atmosphere and attack anyone, anywhere.
See VIDEO Missile
Kinzhal (Dague)
The Dague missile (Kinzhal in
Russian) must be fired from a bomber in order to reach hypersonic speed in the
atmosphere – it travels at five times the speed of sound. This
incredible speed of course makes it impossible to intercept. It was tested with
success three months ago.
See VIDEO Missile de
croisière à réacteur et à c
Russia also possesses a motor which
draws its energy from a nuclear power plant which has been miniaturised to
the point of being able to equip a nuclear warhead cruise missile. Since cruise
missiles have an unpredictable trajectory, and this motor has almost infinite
autonomy, they are, for the moment, invincible.
See VIDEO Drone
sousmarin nucléaire russe
This motor, placed on an underwater
drone, enables it to carry a considerable nuclear charge at speeds many times
faster than a classic submarine. Apart from its radioactive effects, the
charge could trigger a tsunami 500 metres high off any ocean coastline.
See VIDEO Projectile
hypersonique Avant-garde
Finally, Russia is attempting to
develop a hypersonic projectile, the Avant-Garde, which would not only
combine the characteristics of the Sarmate (passage in space) and the speed of
the Dague, but whose trajectory could also be adjusted during its journey.
Russia’s new nuclear weapons have
been conceived in order to render inoperative the anti-missile « shield » that
the Pentagon has been developing all over the world, base after base, for forty
years. It is not a question of superior force, but technical conception. The
principle of the « shield » offers no possible defence against them.
See VIDEO Arme laser
anti-missiles
Worse still, President Putin also
announced the creation of a laser weapon whose characteristics he did
not specify. It seems that it may be capable of intercepting certain US
launchers.
For the moment, the chiefs of staff of the member-states of
NATO refuse to believe a word of these allegations, since these weapons sound
to them like science-fiction.
Russia is the land of chess, not
poker, and History has taught us that it never bluffs about its own weaponry.
It has often led us to believe that weapons under development were already
operational, but it has never officially announced as « combat ready » weapons
which were still being tested. The more than 200 new weapons used in Syria have
convinced us of the technological advance of their scientists.
The immense progress of Russia has
robbed the United States of its first-strike privilege. From now on, in
case of nuclear war, the two major powers could hit one another with mutual
strikes. The USA possess a considerably greater number of nuclear missiles, and
Russia would be able to intercept many of them. Since they both have the
capacity to devastate the planet several times over, they are both
theoretically equal in this type of confrontation.
On the US side, the
military-industrial complex has been broken down for the last twenty years.
The most important aviation project in history, the F-35, was intended to
replace the F-16, the F-18 and the F-22, but Lockheed Martin is unable to
conceive the software it promised. The current version of the F-35 is in reality
totally incapable of honouring its technical specifications, and the US Air
Force is presently considering rebooting the production of its older aircraft.
It is true that President Donald
Trump and his team have decided to attract new brains to the United States in
order to relaunch the production of weapons and oblige the
military-industrial lobby to respond to the needs of the Pentagon instead of
continuing to sell it the same old wrecks. But it will take them at least
twenty years to catch up.
The technical progress of Russia not
only shakes up the world order by unexpectedly restoring a bipolar system, it
also forces the strategists to rethink the conditions of war.
History has taught us that few men realize
quickly enough the changes in the military paradigm. In the 15th
century, when the French and English armies fought the battle of Agincourt, the
armoured horsemen of France were destroyed by the English archers and
arbalists, although they were inferior in number. However, the generals
persisted in giving privilege to hand to hand combat, instead of combat at a
distance using arrows and cannon-balls. So, for another century, we saw
armoured horsemen being massacred on the battle-field.
For example, no tank battle has been
waged since the defeat of President Hussein, in 1991, during Operation Desert
Storm. And yet almost all armies were unable to interpret what had
happened. The victory, in 2006, of small groups of Hezbollah Resistants against
Israëli Merkava tanks, unequivocably demonstrated the vulnerability of this
type of weapon. Rare are the states which have learned from this – except
Australia and Syria, for example. Russia itself persists in producing these
enormous rolling fortresses which are incapable of resisting their own
properly-used RPG’s.
The Russian arsenal is invincible,
at least if someone tries to fight them using old methods of combat. For
example, intercepting hypersonic projectiles is unthinkable. But it may be
possible to take control of them before they reach top speed. Military research
will therefore concentrate on the control of enemy commands and communications.
But in this sector too, Russia is in the lead.
…
----
----
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario