NATO, SAUDIS and QATAR BEHIND THE UN RESOLUTION. THEY DON'T CARE FOR PEACE, FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY

DO STATES WHO VOTE SAUDI RES on SYRIA REALLY BELIEVE THAT SAUDIS & QATAR CARE FOR PEACE, FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY?

Saudi Arabia & Qatar royalties were the main suppliers of Al Qaeda mercenaries sent to destroy the Syrian State and government. These terrorists were funded by such royalties, trained and armed by them with the complicity of the US-UK and France in the time of Sarkozy and they are the main cause of the humanitarian disaster in Syria.

For the sake of fairness and decency of the UN Assembly, the delegates attending the meeting should have not allow to debate any resolution drafted by Saudis & Qatar and much less allowing them to have a leading voice during the meeting. There is a conflict of interest in such role since Saudis & Qatar were publicly denounced as main responsible for the current crisis in Syria. The Res is simply vicious, skewed, and had not moral authority whatsoever.

Saudis and Qatar are the royalties who have kidnapped the Arab League and they are the main associates of the NATO humanitarian disasters created in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and now in Syria. Saudi and Qatar do not have moral authority to talk about democracy (they are corrupted tyrants of their own population) much less to talk about freedom and peace.

These royalties are the main emporium of fundamentalist jihadist that terrorize the world, starting with the terrorist attack in the US in Sept 11, 2001.

They should have not voice in the UN until they repair the damaged caused in countries they were planted and not voice at all in the UN until they install democracy in their own country.


HOW TO EXPLAIN THIS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION?


Is this another US embassies bribe worldwide to stupid officials?

Where the money to travel to NY (UN station) came from?

Does the government of Peru allowed this attack to peace on Syria by the main perpetrators of violence? What if these royalties sent mercenaries to Peru to separate the Amazonian regions from the rest of the country on the claim that the regime is violating human rights of their native population? It is a shame the Peruvian vote in favor of the Saudis draft.

Does the voter in the UN got the consent of their own Government & Senate?


THE NASTY HYPOCRESI OF NATO, SAUDIS & QATAR

The UN controlled by NATO terrorists and their puppets in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Arab League as it is NOW a serious danger, the greatest menace to PEACE and stability to all third world countries.

Why? Because the UN did not call General Assembly when the terrorist mercenaries –heavily armed by such royalties and trained by NATO (US-UK) were sent inside to destabilize Libya and Syria.

A sovereign State have the right to protect their population, their sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic (as draft it in the UN Gral Assembly Session of July 31st, 2012, to prevent armed conflict. This Assembly came also late, but it is that Gadhafi and Assad defended, the State sovereignty.

NATO and the corrupt royalties were expecting the response of the State to claim “the right to protect civilians” and intervene directly. The coming Resolution is intended to pave the road for such operation. That is the nasty hypocrisy of their language on “humanitarian intervention”. Interventions that in fact worsen the civilian disaster they create in the first place when they sent armed mercenaries to Syria and Libya before.


WHAT TO DO?

Latin America should create their own section of the UN and get out from the OAS, the Latino instrument used by the US State Department to impose their interest in the South and demand:

a. total separation of NATO from the UN until they punish their companies that profit from wars and the manufacturing of WMD

b. total separation of the terrorists royalties -starting with Saudis and Qatar- from the UNITED NATIONS until they call for democratic elections in their own countries.

------------------------------

BASIC INFO:

UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY BACKS “RESOLUTION” ON SYRIA

[NOTE: There is not such RES so far, what we have is an “in process resolution” that will be draft it by the same main perpetrators of violence in Syria (NATO and its puppet-royalty) and forced the client states of the US to sign it.]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2012/aug/03/syria-conflict-annan-live

The UN general assembly has overwhelmingly denounced Syria's crackdown and demanded the securing of its chemical and biological weapons.

Voting was 133 in favor, with 12 against and 31 abstentions.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE BUT CAN CARRY MORAL WEIGHT.

[NOTE: that is drafted by immoral cannot carry moral weight, on reverse, it carries immorality]

The resolution says "the first step in the cessation of violence has to be made by the Syrian authorities".

The resolution's Arab sponsors had earlier diluted two key provisions: a demand that President Assad resign and a call for other countries to impose sanctions on Syria.
Russia and China had objected to those provisions.

The Associated Press says the vote was meant in part to pressure the security council to act, but frustration over the lack of action so far was clear.
Before the vote, UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon reminded the assembly of the fresh violence in the city of Aleppo and drew comparisons between the failure to act in Syria to past genocide in Srebrenica and Rwanda.

"The acts of brutality that are being reported may constitute crimes against humanity or war crimes," he said of the Aleppo fighting. "Such acts must be investigated and the perpetrators held to account."

----------------

SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENTS ON SYRIA
SYRIA


• The UN general assembly is debating a Saudi-drafted (but non-binding) resolution which condemns the Security Council for failing to stop the violence in Syria.

• A video posted on YouTube purports to show the rebels' interrogation of clan leader Zaino Berri before he was killed.

• Rebel forces are running out of food and can nothing for civilians fleeing the violence, a colonel from the Free Syrian Army told the Guardian.

• Syria has signalled its determination to continue to "combat terrorism" while at the same time claiming it is still committed to Annan's six point peace plan. Iran has blamed western and Arab countries for the plan's failure. Meanwhile, the Obama administration blamed Russia and China for Annan's resignation.