KOFFI ANNAN NEVER INTENDED TO GET PEACE IN SYRIA

KOFFI ANNAN NEVER INTENDED TO GET PEACE IN SYRIA
Hugo Adan.
August 3, 2012

1. He was elected Sec Gral of the UN when the UN was totally controlled by NATO allies and when the Arab League was controlled by the Saudis, Qatar and Emirates , and Annan renounced to both of them. All of them (NATO and the Arab League members) have poor record on peace, democracy and freedom. He wasn’t hired for the cause of peace, but because his failed R2P (responsibility to protect civilian in war-time) proposal fit with NATO objectives for military expansionism and because he was a useful servant easy to be manipulated by big Western corporations that profit from wars, and by the ultra-millionaires in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Emirates. He was the perfect cover arm-dealer for all of them. Now, that the destruction of Syria is done, they don't need him anymore and they cannot protect him anymore, that is why he resigned.

----------------

Note: CIA apparatuses can say that Kofi Annan was the genuine inspirator of R2P, because he brought the sad experience of Africa to debate. In Africa happens horrible massacres among rival tribes (Rwanda cases among them), that forced some States to create a united military command to put an end to such crimes. This experience was just that NATO wanted: to be converted into the unique military command of the world working with the disguise of "humanity". If that NATO did, they did not to stop war crimes and crimes against humanity, they made it worse but cover them up with the language of “humanitarian intervention”. See in the Annex below: Point 3, The AU's Constitutive Act and the Ezulwini Consensus. The fact that Annan brought back the African experience, an experience that CIA sub-agencies reinterpreted for their convenience in 2000-03 with Annan consent, made possible that US Sec of State & bureaucrats changed his opinion on him. Although Kofi Annan was requested to resign his post as Sec Gral of the UN by Senator Norm Coleman because he was involved in the scandal OIL FOR FOOD PROGRAM (based on an independent investigation on corruption lead by Paul Volcker, 2004),even though, Kofi Annan was pardoned and the accusations silenced. The US bureaucrats decided to use him instead, Kofi Annan was the perfect type of businessman. I didn't matter if Annan used the bribes from the selling of Iraq Oil to fund Aq Qaeda group (perhaps this money went to the pocket of Prince Bandar & the Bush-Saudi Carlyle mafia). That is not mentioned in the report:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil-for-Food_Program#US_Senate_investigations
Open: http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/about-rtop/

---------------

2. Annan also has a poor record on peace affairs worldwide: He was nominated as UN president by the request of the State Department and CIA top officials. His mission was to implement the UN Res known as R2P (Responsibility to Protect) drafted by the Pentagon and NATO in 2000-2002. Such proposal served to legitimize the bombing Iraq and Libya.

Before living his post in the UN, he implemented the CIA revised project of R2P with the UN Res 1674. This law was introduced to legitimize the horrors of “humanitarian interventions” of the US-NATO. Rhetorically the law was designed to protect civilians, but it produced the opposite shocking effects. With this legal instrument -Res 1674- NATO got free hands to fund, train and equip the mercenaries not only in Libya, but also in Syria. This is the good service that Kofi Annan did to imperialist powers. That is also the main reason why NATO and the Arab League nominated him as president of the Committee to supervise the peace process in Syria.

3. THE FAILURE OF R2P in Syria. As soon as this mission was accepted in Syria (fatal error of Assad’ regime the acceptance of this mission) the mercenaries got a robust help to implement the NATO violence that intended the regime-change. However, the original R2P –especially the not fly zone- couldn’t be implemented by Nato and Arab League because of the veto power of Russia and China inside the Sec Council of the UN

4. From his mission in Syria, Annan not only got funds from NATO and the Arab League royalties, he also got the support of Russians. Annan in fact allowed both sides to smuggle heavy weapons that destroyed the whole infrastructure of Syria. The Free Syrian Army was armed by Americans via Turks, and the Muslim brotherhood were armed by Saudis, Qatar & Emirates. The Europeans also participate in the training and arming of mercenaries known as rebels. Annan also allowed the Regime of Assad be armed by Russia and is possible that they also armed the civil militias (most Christian) that oppose the regime but are against foreign intervention.

Koffi Annan was the perfect type of arm-dealer contact for all of them, until his well-paid job became dangerous. There are rumors saying that the Assad regimen hired the jihadist that killed high members of his regime (possible defectors). It is also said that Prince Bandar, the main founder of the jihadist linked to Al Qaeda Saudis was killed in Syria. Meaning, the life of Kofi Annan was in danger inside Syria.

Kofi Annan, is the best example of mercenarism at the level of diplomacy. The case is that he couldn’t be protected by none of his sponsors and clients. This is why he renounced. Annan and the world loose nothing with his departure. Annan‘s service to the cause of destruction of Syria has been done. His recent accusation to Assad’ regimen of noncompliance with the six points of the peace process has non-sense at all, that is just cynical hypocrisy.

----------------------

ANNEX:

Point 3. THE AU'S CONSTITUTIVE ACT AND THE EZULWINI CONSENSUS
THE JUNGLE’S RULE IMPLEMENTED WORLWIDE

Meanwhile, in 2000, African nations were working to enshrine the principles of R2P within the founding Charter of the African Union (AU).

First, the Constitutive Act defines the promotion of peace, security and stability and the promotion and protection of “human and peoples’ rights” as core objective of the Union.

Second, it identifies “respect for democratic principles, human rights, the rule of law and good governance”, "respect for the sanctity of human life”, and “condemnation and rejection of impunity” among its core values. Most significantly, Article 4(h) of the Constitutive Act states that it is the “right of the Union to intervene in a Member State pursuant to a decision of the Assembly in respect of grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.”

This important clause conveys one end of the full R2P spectrum - military intervention - but the Charter shows the commitment of African Nations to protecting populations from atrocity, even if infringement on the sovereignty of its members is required.

The report, known as the ”Ezulwini Consensus”, was expressed at the African Union’s 7th Extraordinary Session of the Executive Council of 1-8 March 2005, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. In its report, the AU embraced the Responsibility to Protect and recognized the authority of the Security Council to decide on the use of force in situations of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and ethnic cleansing.

SEE: http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/index.php/about-rtop/