Nueva Democracia: JAN 23-2022 Part 1-2 SIT ECON y POL

JAN 23-2022 Part 1-2 SIT ECON y POL

ND denounce- debacle y propone State-Social + Capit-compet in Eco

Quick News

Intimidation & fear is d purpose, if you accept, you are 1 more slave

BoMBS AWoKe...

BY williambanzai7

Kiev in the short hairs...

====

Future:

NO violent games for kids any-longer.They can’t control themselves & parent won’t

DARK SIDE OF METAVERSE EXPOSED: WHY YOUR KIDS NEED TO STAY AWAY FROM VRCHAT

VRChat is "not a place for children."

….

We need a society for PEACE NOT for WAR. Our fut depends on today’ vision

====

ZERO HEDGE ECONOMICS

Neoliberal globalization is over. Financiers know it, they documented with graphics

SEEING RED: IS THE HEYDEY OF PANDEMIC STOCKS OVER?

by Tyler Durden

While investor exuberance drove many of these stocks up last year, 2022 is beginning to paint a different picture... [ See Chart ]

The stock market, and the stocks that flourished during the COVID-19 pandemic in particular, are off to a rough start in 2022. As Visual Capitalist's Jenna Ross points out, if you’ve been watching your investment accounts, chances are you’ve been seeing a lot of red. Shaken by the uncertainty of a pandemic recovery and future interest rate hikes, investors have been selling off their stocks.

This market selloff—which occurs when investors sell a large volume of securities in a short period of time, leading to a rapid decline in price—has investors concerned. In fact, search interest for the term “selloff” recently reached peak interest of 100.

See Chart:

https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/selloff-search-trend.jpg?itok=NYvW39JF

Which stocks were the hardest hit, and how much are their prices down so far this year?

THE LACKLUSTER RETURNS OF PANDEMIC STOCKS

Pandemic stocks and tech-centric companies have suffered the most. Here’s a closer look at the year-to-date price returns for select stocks

See Chart:

https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/2022-market-selloff-pandemic-stocks-1.png?itok=RyMedmWr

Netflix fueled the selloff after it reported disappointing subscriber growth. The company added 8.28 million subscribers in the fourth quarter, which is less than the 8.5 million it added in the fourth quarter of 2020. It also projects to have slower year-over-year subscriber growth in the near term, citing competition from other streaming companies.

Meanwhile, Coinbase stock lost nearly a quarter of its value so far this year. As the price of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin have plummeted, investors worry Coinbase will see lower trading volume and therefore lower fees.

The contagion also spread to other pandemic stocks, such as Zoom and DocuSign, as investors began to doubt the staying power of stay-at-home stocks.

FOLLOWING THE HERD

While investor exuberance drove many of these stocks up last year, 2022 is beginning to paint a different picture.

Investors are worried that rising rates will negatively impact high-growth stocks, because it means it’s more expensive to borrow money. Not only that, but they also may see Netflix’s growth as harbinger of things to come for other pandemic stocks.

The psychology of the market cycle also plays a role—amid these fears, investors have adopted a herd mentality and begun selling their shares in droves.

….

SOURCE: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/seeing-red-heydey-pandemic-stocks-over

----

US DOMESTIC POLITICS

Seudo democ duopolico in US is obsolete; it’s full of frauds & corruption.

UPDATE of US IMPERIALISM:

THE THREE TYPES OF US-LED REGIME CHANGE

Authored by Joe Lauria via Consortium News,

Historical outline of the CIA playbook:

from Above, from Below,

and overt Intervention.

From Above. If the targeted leader has been democratically elected and enjoys popular support, the CIA has worked with elite groups, such as the military, to overthrow him (sometimes through assassination). Among several examples is the first CIA-backed coup d’état, on March 30, 1949, just 18 months after the agency’s founding, when Syrian Army Colonel Husni al-Za’im overthrew the elected president, Shukri al-Quwatli.

The CIA in 1954 toppled the elected President Jacobo Árbenz of Guatemala, who was replaced with a military dictator. In 1961, just three days before the inauguration of President John F. Kennedy, who favored his release, Congolese President Patrice Lumumba was assassinated with CIA assistance, bringing military strongman Mobutu Sese Seko to power. In 1973, the US backed Chilean General Augusto Pinochet to overthrow and kill the democratically-elected, socialist President Salvador Allende, setting up a military dictatorship, one of many U.S.-installed military dictatorships of that era in Latin America under Operation Condor.

From Below. If the targeted government faces genuine popular unrest, the U.S. will foment and organize it to topple the leader, elected or otherwise. 1958-59 anti-communist protests in Kerala, India, locally supported by the Congress Party and the Catholic Church, were funded by the CIA, leading to the removal of the elected communist government. The 1953 coup in Iran that overthrew the democratically-elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was a combination of bottom-up CIA (and MI-6)-backed street protests, and top-down conservative clergy and military to destroy democracy and return a monarch to the throne. The US-backed Ukrainian coup of 2014 is the latest example of the US working with genuine popular dissent to help organize and steer the overthrow, in this case, of an OSCE-certified elected president.

Through Military Intervention. If a coup is not feasible, the US turns to indirect or direct military intervention. One of earliest examples was the US expeditionary force that invaded Russia in 1918 during the civil war in an attempt to help overthrow the new Bolshevik government. More recently, in 1983 the U.S. military invaded Grenada to overthrow a Marxist president; in 1989 the U.S. invaded Panama to overthrow former CIA asset Manuela Noriega.

Another hybrid operation was the US bombing of Serbia in 1999 and the State Department funding of the opposition group Otpor!, which led to the ouster of Slobodan Milosevic. The most prominent recent examples of direct military invasion to overthrow governments are the U.S.-led invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. INDIRECT MILITARY INTERVENTION through proxies to overthrow governments happened in the 1980s Contra war against Nicaragua; and the 2011 to present jihadist war to overthrow the Syrian government.

NOT FROM THIN AIR

Economic sanctions are commonly imposed by the US in advance to "soften up" the target. In non-military interventions, the US does not create regime change out of whole cloth: it works with pre-existing dissent, whether in the population or in the military or another elite group. It will harness it, fund it, train it and organize it, but not create it.

In other words, IN REGIME CHANGE that doesn’t involve invasion and occupation, it is not a question of either US involvement or genuine dissent. It is almost always both.

And sometimes a cigar is just a cigar: there are legitimate revolts that are not taken over by the US because the uprisings are against US clients’ and Washington’s interests: for instance, the 2010 uprising in Bahrain. In such cases the US will support crushing dissent (as it is ready to do at home as well).

Kazakhstan

Last week, Consortium News ran two pieces on the uprisings in Kazakhstan. The first, by Craig Murray, made the argument that the CIA was not involved and that the uprising was genuine, given the country’s economic inequality and increases in fuel prices that were quickly reversed.

The NED in Kazakhstan

Since Kazakhstan’s independence in 1990 after the breakup of the Soviet Union the country has been run by one man, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Though he formally stepped down in 2019 in favor of his hand-picked successor, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, Nazarbayev is still the power behind the throne. Nursultan, the new capital city, was named after him in 2019.

In 2020, the NED spent $1,082,991 on 20 programs in Kazakhstan. One was $50,000 to "promote freedom of peaceful assembly" through "strategic litigation to support activists facing repression." Another, for $65,000 was to "promote civic engagement among youth in Kazakhstan."

Genuine Kazakh Revolt

This money was poured into a country with pre-existing tensions that exploded from Jan. 2 to Jan. 11, leaving 227 people dead, 9,900 arrested and vast sections of city centers looted and destroyed. At the start the government tried to quell the protests by again capping fuel prices, the government resigned and Nazarbayev stepped down as chairman of the national security council. It didn’t work. Shoot to kill orders were issued against the rioters.

Ultimately, Russian troops as part of the Collective Security Treaty Organization mission restored order. In a news analysis on Jan. 6, The New York Times Eastern Europe bureau chief made an unattributed, editorial comment: "And once Russian troops arrive, they seldom, if ever, go home." Normally the corporate media are fed such lines by unnamed US officials. In this case the US government line seemed to work in reverse.

The next day U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, "One lesson of recent history is that once Russians are in your house, it’s sometimes very difficult to get them to leave." Moscow reacted furiously, pointing out that the US should examine its history of the invasions of Vietnam and Iraq. "If Antony Blinken loves history lessons so much, then he should take the following into account: when Americans are in your house, it can be difficult to stay alive and not be robbed or raped," the foreign ministry said.

The Russian and other CSTO troops left Kazakhstan on Wednesday.

US INTERESTS IN KAZAKHSTAN

Installing a government hostile to Russia and China, which both border Kazakhstan, would be advantageous to the US It could disrupt China’s Silk Roads initiative through the country and the U.S. could put a military base in Kazakhstan. Since April the US has been trying to find a Central Asian country for a base to further the encircling pressure on Russia. There are also oil and gas deposits beckoning.

Despite these interests, the second article that Consortium News ran last week advised the U.S. stay out of Kazakhstan. Saying there was no evidence of U.S. involvement with the protests, Anatol Lieven wrote:

"If the Kazakh government collapses or is gravely weakened, it would be very surprising if hard line elements in Washington did not see this as an opportunity to use Kazakhstan as a base to undermine Chinese rule in Sinkiang — even if (as in Syria) this led them into de facto alliance with Islamist extremist forces.

For America to use Kazakhstan in this way would be both a crime and a blunder, that would recall the worst aspects of U.S. policy in Africa, Asia, and Central America during the Cold War. It would in fact cast America in the role in which American commentators like to cast Russia — that of a cynical troublemaker, absolutely indifferent to the consequences of its actions for unfortunate populations on the ground."

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE CAUSES

Was in fact the US not involved in the uprising, as Lieven maintains?

According to Russian President Vladimir Putin, "The events in Kazakhstan are not the first and far from the last attempt to interfere in the internal affairs of our states from the outside." He told other CSTO leaders on Jan. 10: "The measures taken by the CSTO made it clear that we would not let anyone destabilize the situation at our home and implement so-called 'color revolution' scenarios."

Putin also said, "Elements of force and information support of protests were actively used, and well-organized and well-controlled groups of militants were also used … including those who had obviously been trained in terrorist camps abroad."

Normally in regime change operations, the US has a leader in exile ready to be installed. Mukhtar Ablyazov, leader of the Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan, is in exile in Paris. He says he has not accepted Western money, asked for Western sanctions, which have not come, and egged on what he called the revolution unfolding in his country. He claimed Russia was "occupying" Kazakhstan, only to see the uprising end and Russian troops leave.

UKRAINE

In 2014 in Ukraine, there was also the circumstantial evidence of NED involvement. Then U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland told the U.S.-Ukrainian Foundation on Dec. 13, 2013, that Washington had spent $5 billion over a decade to support Ukraine’s "European aspirations," in other words to pull it away from Russia.

But there was also a smoking gun. It came in the form of the leaked telephone call between Nuland and the then US ambassador to Ukraine in which they discussed who the new Ukrainian leader would be, weeks before the coup occurred.

In Kazakhstan, despite the circumstantial evidence, there is no smoking gun so far. Therefore the question of whether there was direct and decisive U.S. involvement in the Kazakh uprising must remain inconclusive.

….

SOURCE: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/three-types-us-regime-change

----

IF violence is un-control: both parties (Dems-Reps) must be declared obsolete

DON'T BELIEVE THE DEMOCRATS' "MEDICAL BANKRUPTCY" NARRATIVE

"The dystopian portrait painted by Sanders and his allies doesn't reflect reality"

====

NON-CITIZEN VOTING PUSH IS PART OF AGENDA TO RID AMERICA OF CITIZENSHIP:

"It’s actually pretty clear that it violates the New York State Constitution"

====

US-WORLD ISSUES (Geo Econ, Geo Pol & global Wars)

Global depression is on…China, RU, Iran search for State socialis, D rest in limbo

GERMANY ROILED BY "POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE": NAVY CHIEF RESIGNS AFTER SAYING "PUTIN DESERVES RESPECT", WARNING CHINA IS "NOT A NICE COUNTRY"

“Does Russia really want a small and tiny strip of Ukraine soil to integrate into their country? No, this is nonsense. Putin is probably putting pressure because can do it and he splits EU opinion. What he really wants is respect.”

====

"CAREER ADVANCEMENT TIED TO WHETHER YOU HAVE KIDS" AS CHINA'S BIRTH-RATE HITS RECORD LOW

...the Chinese government has been ramping up efforts to encourage people to have more children. [ See Chart ]

====

NUKE missiles included?:

STARLINK SATELLITES MAY DISRUPT DETECTION OF NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS, STUDY WARNS

"There is a small chance that we would miss an asteroid or another event hidden behind a satellite streak..."

====

Don’t trust UK: there is not mind at the top.. only mess. Their pro-WW3 regime:obsolete

'RUSSIA SECRETLY PLOTTING REGIME CHANGE IN UKRAINE': UK GOVT ISSUES ASTOUNDING CHARGE

"We have information that indicates the Russian Government is looking to install a pro-Russian leader in Kyiv..."

====