THE POSSIBLE REPERCUSSIONS OF «LIBERATING» THE YUAN. Part II of: On The «Bombshell» Dropped by
China on 20 November 2013
By
Valentin Katasonov 01-12-13. http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/12/01/on-the-bombshell-dropped-by-china-on-20-november-2013-ii.html
Back to Part I
if you wish Or click http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/11/29/on-the-bombshell-dropped-by-china-on-20-november-2013-i.html
Here the continuation of Part 1
We, however,
are not going to put a lid on it as the Chinese liberals would like to do, but
are going to continue examining the chain of cause and effect:
1. A free yuan
would begin its own rapid rise; from cheap, it would quickly become
expensive.
2. A rise in
the yuan’s exchange rate would lead to a fall in the international
competitiveness of Chinese goods. There would be a relatively rapid fall in the
volume of exports, and imports would increase. China’s surplus trade balance
would quickly switch from positive to negative.
3. The enormous
foreign-exchange reserves that China has at the moment would, over several
years, melt away like the winter snow melts into slushy puddles.
4. Chinese
businesses, deprived of a market, would begin to grind to a halt, and millions
and tens of millions of employees would find themselves out on the street. The
real economic sector would quickly begin to deteriorate.
5. In order to
stop businesses going bankrupt, and for the government to import essential
goods, China would have to resort to help from foreign creditors and
investors.
6. The West
would give this kind of help willingly. As a result, assets in the Chinese
economy would pass into the hands of transnational corporations, while in terms
of external public debt, China would be in a worse position than Greece is
today.
7. In
dismantling its foreign exchange regulations for capital transactions, China
could find itself completely unprotected from the impact of global financial
crises. Speculators like Soros could start speculating on the fall of the yuan.
China would then need their foreign-exchange reserves to withstand these
financial speculators, but would no longer have them.
8. Very
quickly, the yuan would become a weak currency, having lost even those few
signs of an international currency it has now, in 2013. Moreover, the weakness
of the yuan would not depend that heavily on whether the dollar maintains its
own position or not. The yuan would be weak against the currencies of those
countries that have preserved their real economic sectors.
THE
UNFORTUNATE EXPERIENCE OF JAPAN
At this point,
one could think of the dismal fate of Japan, which two decades ago seriously
thought that the yen could draw level with the US dollar or even replace it.
Incidentally, based on many relative economic indicators, the Japan at that
time looked even better than China looks today. Present-day Japan is still in
the world’s seven leading economically developed countries, although it now
plays second fiddle.
Let us once
again go back to the outcome document of the last plenum of the Central
Committee of the Communist Party of China. It particularly highlights the need
for the rapid currency liberalisation of China’s capital transactions. Put
simply, in order to carry out cross-border transactions (the export and import
of capital), Chinese and foreign investors should not experience any kind of
difficulties in converting the yuan into foreign currencies or, likewise,
foreign currencies into the yuan.
Why the hurry?
Evidently, the Chinese liberals are working out their chess game more than one
move at a time. They are aware that should the yuan’s exchange rate be
liberalised, the country would very quickly be deprived of export revenue, with
everything that that implies. They are aware of it, and are expecting export
revenue to be replaced with money from foreign investors. The latter would
require a full conversion of the yuan, of course, not only in order to invest
their own dollars and euro into the Chinese economy, but also in order to
freely withdraw investment income from the country in those same dollars and
euro. However, replacing export revenue with foreign investment is an extremely
complicated business. Suffice it to say that in 2012, revenue from Chinese
exports amounted to nearly USD 2 trillion, while the influx of direct foreign
investment in the Chinese economy was just USD 120 billion. No kind of
currency liberalisation is able to guarantee complete substitution, if for
no other reason than that the world does not yet have that amount of direct
international investments. Also in 2012, direct cross-border investments as a
whole consisted of just USD 1.3 trillion.
As global
experience shows, the full liberalisation of capital transactions in countries
on the periphery of global capitalism usually leads to speculators with their
hot money, rather than strategic investors, swooping down on the country.
Investors like these do not develop the economy, but pick at its assets and destabilise
the work of those businesses still clinging to life. The full liberalisation
of capital transactions at the end of the 1980s-beginning of the 1990s that
took place in a number of ASEAN countries known back then as the «Asian Tigers»
resulted in these tigers becoming pitiful kittens. The result of liberalising
the movement of capital fully emerged during the financial crisis in Southeast
Asia in 1998. It inflicted incalculable damage on the economies of these former
tigers...
At the November
plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, emphasis was
placed on stepping up the export of capital from China. A strong yuan is
definitely needed to improve the efficiency of this kind of export. Following
the cancellation of the yuan’s controlled rate of exchange, the Chinese
currency’s exchange rate will go up for a time. I do not know how long this
growth will continue. Maybe a year or two, but it is unlikely to be more than
that. This is the time that capital should be withdrawn from China and invested
in financial and non-financial assets in other countries. It seems that Chinese
liberals are getting ready for the escape of capital (and their own capital at
the same time) from the country of «victorious socialism». Liberal Chinese officials
only need highbrow conversations on the yuan as an international currency and
currency liberalisation for an escape from the country. As it happens,
according to the international non-profit organisation Global Financial
Integrity (GFI), during the first decade of the 21st century, capital
was illegally removed from China to the tune of USD 2.74 trillion. In 2010
alone, the illegal withdrawal of capital amounted to USD 420 billion, which is
approximately equal to one quarter of China’s total export revenue in that same
year. The removal of capital from China is risky for its organisers and
beneficiaries (corrupt officials and associated businessmen). It is these shady
exporters of capital that are primarily lobbying for the speedy cancellation of
all restrictions on the withdrawal of capital, the conversion of the yuan and
its transformation into a strong currency.
ON
THE FEARS OF MICHAEL SNYDER
Let us once
again return to Michael Snyder’s article. He is an American. Therefore, he is
most concerned about the repercussions for America of the People’s Bank of
China stopping any further accumulation of dollars. In his opinion, the brunt
of the Chinese bombshell will fall on the United States. America has still not
had time to recover from the events in October of
this year. You will recall that government funding in the country was put on
hold because the US Congress did not approve the federal budget for the next
financial year. And the main reason why it was not approved is that the
government had exhausted its borrowing limit. The events in October show how
shaky the well-being of satiated America really is. It depends on countries
like China that are faithfully buying up US Treasury bonds. In October this
year, every tenth dollar of these bond loans was from China. Losing 1/10 of its
loans would be keenly felt by America. What is more, other donors to Uncle Sam
could follow China. The US Treasury’s loss of nourishment from China could lead
to a sharp rise in interest rates on US government bonds, which could lead to a
whole host of problems for the American economy. A significant rise in the
percentage of so-called interest expenditure (expenditure on the servicing of
public debt) in the federal budget, for example. A rise in the cost of loans
and credit lines would also become unavoidable, which would put paid to any
hopes of restoring the American economy as set forth in the quantitative easing
programme.
Yes, Michael
Snyder and other Americans do have cause for concern. For the moment, however,
China cannot be regarded as the main reason for America’s troubles. The fact is
that in September 2012, the US Federal Reserve System launched a third round of
quantitative easing (QE). Its official aim was to restore the American economy,
which was suffering from the financial crisis, and bring unemployment down to a
safe level. To accomplish this, the FRS throws USD 85 billion into the finance
and banking sector every month by purchasing the mortgage-backed securities of
American banks on the secondary market (for USD 40 billion) and US Treasury
obligations (for USD 85 billion). Quantitative easing has resulted in the
Federal Reserve becoming the main buyer of Treasury securities over the last
year. Foreign central banks and other buyers have found themselves with very
little. Why the FRS made such a sharp turnaround over the last year is
difficult to say at present. Maybe it is because Washington decided to insure
itself against possible boycotts from central banks in other countries. From
this it follows that: even if the statement by a high-ranking official from the
People’s Bank of China on 20 November becomes a reality, i.e. the central bank
of China stops buying American securities completely, the collapse of America
will not happen immediately. The collapse of America might happen, but for a
different reason – it will be because the Federal Reserve is unable to
withstand the overload caused by the need to purchase enormous amounts of US
Treasury bonds.
CHINA
ANTICIPATES DIFFICULT TIMES AHEAD
For China to
stop accumulating dollars, meanwhile, would be suicidal. The Chinese economy is
like an aeroplane that has been circling in the air for a long time because the
pilot cannot see a convenient place to land. The petrol is running out and
there is a danger that the aeroplane is going to plummet to earth. Beijing
could only have decided to stop its accumulation of dollars if it had an
alternate airfield on which it was possible to land the aeroplane called the
Chinese economy. This airfield should be understood to mean China’s domestic
market. The Chinese government has been conscious of it for a long time and
over the past ten years has made weak attempts to reorient its manufacturing
industry and other sectors of the economy towards satisfying domestic demand
and creating a single national economic system. The country continued to be
dragged along its tracks by the West, however, until the end of the
1970s-beginning of the 1980s. The country was unable to move over to the rail
tracks of independent economic development. China did not have a domestic
market then, just as it does not now, which is why it depends on external
markets and the American dollar.
It appears that
any plans to reorient the Chinese economy towards the domestic market were put
paid to at the November (2013) plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist
Party of China. The Chinese government decided to continue its policy of
further integrating China into the global economy, but the nature of this
integration is changing before our very eyes. Beginning with Deng Xiaoping,
China has spent the last three decades conquering the world’s commodities
markets. The country turned into a global workshop serving half the world, and
China was the model for a dependent type of industrial capitalism that had
retained its socialist rhetoric. Socialism in China is understood to mean an
eastern variety of state capitalism. Following the global economic crisis,
since about 2010, something has emerged that Beijing finds completely
unacceptable: China’s opportunities for the extensive development of the
world’s commodities markets have been exhausted. The country’s economic growth
rates have begun to slow, which is not yet a catastrophe, but it is worrying.
Between 2010 and 2011, China’s party-state leadership agonisingly searched for
a way out of the emerging impasse. The 12th Five Year Plan, adopted in 2011,
implicitly reflected the adjustment of the country’s economic policy: an
orientation towards the speedy development of its domestic financial market,
the gradual opening up of this market to the outside world, and the development
and conquest of the world’s financial markets. China’s leaders embarked upon a
policy to transform industrial capitalism into financial capitalism.
Financial
capitalism has already been long-established in the countries of the «Golden
Billion», however. The West, and first and foremost the United States, does not
need competition in the form of Chinese financial capitalism. China’s creation
of its own domestic financial market, the partial internationalisation of the
yuan, and full monetary and financial liberalisation are just speeding up
China’s conquest by the Grandees of Western financial capital. There is a
strong possibility that China is going to be facing some hard times in the
years to come.
=============
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario