lunes, 30 de diciembre de 2013

FLU VIRUS SPREAD IN CHICAGO & MYSTERIOUS VIRUSES DECIMATE SEA LIFE IN THE WEST COAST



FLU VIRUS SPREAD IN CHICAGO & MYSTERIOUS VIRUSES DECIMATE SEA LIFE IN THE WEST COAST

H1N1 FLU STRIKES ILLINOIS   Saturday, December 28, 2013  http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local/illinois&id=9373710 

Flu viruses are spreading in Illinois and the leading strain detected in lab tests is H1N1, the same strain that caused a pandemic in 2009.

In Chicago, hospitals are reporting an increase in emergency room visit from people with flu-like symptoms…  "It's been very quiet, very much in the background," Paul Schreckenberger, microbiologist, said of the strain. "Then all of the sudden this year, starting last week, we've had a big upsurge of the 2009 pandemic strain."

While doctors say the number of people infected is expected to climb, they also say people should not panic and this year's flu vaccine includes immunizations for the different H1N1 strains. "We can't just think of the very young and very old as the only ones who need the vaccine. Really, everyone should be vaccinated," Schreckenberger said.

Symptoms of the H1N1 strain are similar to that of the season flu. They include: high temperatures and fatigue; aches and pains; headache, runny nose and sore throat; and vomiting and diarrhea.

In 2009, hundreds of thousands of people worldwide died of the strain.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved.

===========

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/   December 30, 2013

We’ve previous documented that seals, sea lions, polar bears, sea stars, turtles, sockeye salmon, herring, anchovies and sardines on the West Coast of North America are all suffering mysterious diseases … which are killing many.

We’ve asked whether this is related to massive releases of radiation from Fukushima. Update. Sadly, we can now add other wildlife to the list.

EneNews reports:
Los Angeles Times, Dec. 29, 2013: Bald eagles are dying in Utah — 20 in the past few weeks alone — and nobody can figure out why. [...] Many suffered from seizures, head tremors and paralysis [...] Many of the eagles were brought to the mammoth Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Northern Utah [...] Within 48 hours, most were dead. [...] State wildlife specialists are baffled. For weeks, officials have sent birds for necropsies [...] At first, the agency’s disease scientists guessed the illness could be encephalitis, which is caused by the West Nile virus, but later ruled out that possibility. [...] Officials suggest the die-off is possibly connected to the deaths of thousands of eared grebes that began in Utah in November. [...] Officials still don’t know why the shore birds became sick. [...] Officials at the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center have their own theories. Some point to radiation from Japan after the 2011 meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. [...] A call from Idaho shed new light: A wildlife official said bald eagles there were also getting sick, suggesting the birds were arriving in Utah already in bad health.

Buz Marthaler, Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Northern Utah co-founder: “It’s just hard to have your national bird in your arms, going through seizures in a way it can’t control — when you can see it’s pain but don’t know what’s happening to it. As a human being, you just have problems with that. And when you lose one, it just grabs your heart. [...] In an average year, we might get one or two, but we’ve received nine so far, and five of those have died. The other four are still in our care. [...] We aren’t ruling out anything.”
***
Washington Post, Dec. 30, 2013: [...] “This is really concerning to us,” says [Leslie McFarlane, the wildlife disease program coordinator for the state’s Division of Wildlife Resources]. She has been program coordinator for 10 years and describes the recent deaths as “very unusual.” [...] The symptoms noted in the recent spate of deaths—and the broad geographical area in which they have cropped up—are what has officials concerned.


Unfortunately, the American and Japanese governments are doing everything they can to cover up the severity of the Fukushima disaster.  Indeed, anytime government or big corporations screw up, the government works to cover it up … instead of actually fixing the problem. And see this.


========= 

OLIGARCHS, DEMAGOGUES, & MASS REVOLTS AGAINST DEMOCRACY



OLIGARCHS, DEMAGOGUES, & MASS REVOLTS AGAINST DEMOCRACY  :      The MASSES in the Street [can be] FOOLED & then SACRIFICED

By James Petras / The 4th Media News | Monday, December 30, 2013

[Here only extracts: all in brackets and reds added]

The masses in the street [can be] fooled and then sacrificed.
The use of mob violence and “mass revolts” to serve the interests of oligarchical and imperial powers against democratically-elected governments has been a common strategy in recent times.

Throughout the ages, the choreographed “mass revolt” played many roles: (1) it served to destabilize an electoral regime; (2) it provided a platform for its oligarch funders to depose an incumbent regime; (3) it disguised the fact that the oligarchic opposition had lost democratic elections; (4) it provided a political minority with a ‘fig-leaf of legitimacy’ when it was otherwise incapable of acting within a constitutional framework and (5) it allowed for the illegitimate seizure of power in the name of a pseudo ‘majority’, namely the “crowds in the central plaza”.
[..]
What progressives are unwilling to recognize is that the oligarchs orchestrating the mass revolt are authoritarians who completely reject democratic procedures and electoral processes.
Their aim is to establish a ‘junta’, which will eliminate all democratic political and social institutions and freedoms and impose harsher, more repressive and regressive policies and institutions than those they replace. Some leftists support the ‘masses in revolt’ simply because of their ‘militancy’, their numbers and street courage, without examining the underlying leaders, their interests and links to the elite beneficiaries of a ‘regime change’.
[..]

Past and Present Mass Revolts Against Democracy: Guatemala, Iran, and Chile


The use of mobs and mass uprisings by oligarchs and empire builders has a long and notorious history. Three of the bloodiest cases, which scarred their societies for decades, took place in Guatemala in 1954, Iran in 1953, and Chile in 1973.

Guatemala: 1954
Democratically-elected Jacobo Árbenz was the first Guatemalan President to initiate agrarian reform and legalize trade unions, especially among landless farm workers. Árbenz’s reforms included the expropriation of unused, fallow land owned by the United Fruit Company, a giant US agro-business conglomerate.

The CIA used its ties to local oligarchs and right-wing generals and colonels to instigate and finance mass-protests against a phony ‘communist-takeover’ of Guatemala under President Arbenz. The military used the manipulated mob violence and the ‘threat’ of Guatemala becoming a “Soviet satellite”, to stage a bloody coup. The coup leaders received air support from the CIA and slaughtered thousands of Arbenz supporters and turned the countryside into ‘killing fields’.

For the next 50 years political parties, trade unions and peasant organizations were banned, an estimated 200,000 Guatemalans were murdered and millions were displaced.

Iran, 1952 to 1979
In 1952 Mohammed Mossadegh was elected president of Iran on a moderate nationalist platform, after the overthrow of the brutal monarch. Mossadegh announced the nationalization of the petroleum industry.
The CIA, with the collaboration of the local oligarchs, monarchists and demagogues organized ‘anti-communist’ street mobs to stage violent demonstrations providing the pretext for a monarchist- military coup. The CIA-control Iranian generals brought Shah Reza Pahlavi back from Switzerland and for the next 26 years Iran was a monarchist-military dictatorship, whose population was terrorized by the Savak, the murderous secret police.

The US oil companies received the richest oil concessions; the Shah joined Israel and the US in an unholy alliance against progressive nationalist dissidents and worked hand-in-hand to undermine independent Arab states.

Tens of thousands of Iranians were killed, tortured and driven into exile. In 1979, a mass popular uprising led by Islamic movements, nationalist and socialist parties and trade unions drove out the Shah-Savak dictatorship. The Islamists installed a radical nationalist clerical regime, which retains power to this day despite decades of a US-CIA-funded destabilization campaign which has funded both terrorist groups and dissident liberal movements.

Chile, 1973
Chile is the best-known case of CIA-financed mob violence leading to a military coup. In 1970, the democratic socialist Dr. Salvador Allende was elected president of Chile. Despite CIA efforts to buy votes to block Congressional approval of the electoral results and its manipulation of violent demonstrations and an assassination campaign to precipitate a military coup, Allende took office.

During Allende’s tenure as president the CIA financed a variety of “direct actions” –from paying the corrupt leaders of a copper workers union to stage strikes and the truck owners associations to refuse to transport goods to the cities, to manipulating right-wing terrorist groups like the Patria y Libertad (Fatherland and Liberty) in their assassination campaigns.

The CIA’s destabilization program was specifically designed to provoke economic instability through artificial shortages and rationing, in order to incite middle class discontent. This was made notorious by the street demonstrations of pot-banging housewives.

The CIA sought to incite a military coup through economic chaos. Thousands of truck owners were paid not to drive their trucks leading to shortages in the cities, while right-wing terrorists blew up power stations plunging neighborhoods into darkness and shop owners who refused to join the ‘strike’ against Allende were vandalized.

On September 11, 1973, to the chants of ‘Jakarta’ (in celebration of a 1964 CIA coup in Indonesia), a junta of US-backed Chilean generals grabbed power from an elected government. Tens of thousands of activists and government supporters were arrested, killed, tortured and forced into exile.

The dictatorship denationalized and privatized its mining, banking and manufacturing sectors, following the free market dictates of Milton Friedman-trained economists (the so-call “Chicago Boys”). The dictatorship overturned 40 years of welfare, labor and land-reform legislation which had made Chile the most socially advanced country in Latin America. 

With the generals in power, Chile became the ‘neo-liberal model’ for Latin America. Mob violence and the so-called “middle class revolt”, led to the consolidation of oligarchic and imperial rule and a 17-year reign of terror under General Augusto Pinochet dictatorship. 

The whole society was brutalized and with the return of electoral politics, even former ‘leftist’ parties retained the dictatorship’s neo-liberal economic policies, its authoritarian constitution and the military high command. The ‘revolt of the middle class’ in Chile resulted in the greatest concentration of wealth in the hands of the oligarchs in Latin America to this day!

The Contemporary Use and Abuse of “Mass Revolts”: Egypt, Ukraine, Venezuela, Thailand, and Argentina

In recent years “mass revolt” has become the instrument of choice when oligarchs, generals and other empire builders seeking ‘regime change’. By enlisting an assortment of nationalist demagogues and imperial-funded NGO ‘leaders’, they set the conditions for the overthrow of democratically elected governments and stage-managed the installment of their own “free market” regimes with dubious “democratic” credentials.
[…]
CONCLUSION

Mass revolts are two-edged swords: they can be a positive force when they occur against military dictatorships like Pinochet or Mubarak, against authoritarian absolutist monarchies like Saudi Arabia, a colonial-racist state like Israel, and imperial occupations like against the US in Afghanistan. But they have to be directed and controlled by popular local leaders seeking to restore democratic majority rule.

History, from ancient times to the present, teaches us that not all ‘mass revolts’ achieve, or are even motivated by, democratic objectives. Many have served oligarchs seeking to overthrow democratic governments, totalitarian leaders seeking to install fascist and pro-imperial regimes, demagogues and authoritarians seeking to weaken shaky democratic regimes and militarists seeking to start wars for imperial ambitions.

Today, “mass revolts” against democracy have become standard operational procedure for Western European and US rulers who seek to circumvent democratic procedures and install pro-imperial clients.
The practice of democracy is denigrated while the mob is extolled in the imperial Western media. This is why armed Islamist terrorists and mercenaries are called “rebels” in Syria and the mobs in the streets of Kiev (Ukraine) attempting to forcibly depose a democratically-elected government are labeled “pro-Western democrats”.

The ideology informing the “mass revolts” varies from “anti-communist” and “anti-authoritarian” in democratic Venezuela, to “pro-democracy” in Libya (even as tribal bands and mercenaries slaughter whole communities), Egypt and the Ukraine.

Imperial strategists have systematized, codified and made operational “mass revolts” in favor of oligarchic rule. International experts, consultants, demagogues and NGO officials have carved out lucrative careers as they travel to ‘hot spots’ and organize ‘mass revolts’ dragging the target countries into deeper ‘colonization’ via European or US-centered ‘integration’.

Most local leaders and demagogues accept the double agenda: ‘protest today and submit to new masters tomorrow’.

The masses in the street are fooled and then sacrificed. They believe in a ‘New Dawn’ of Western consumerism, higher paid jobs and greater personal freedom … only to be disillusioned when their new rulers fill the jails with opponents and many former protestors, raise prices, cut salaries, privatize state companies, sell off the most lucrative firms to foreigners and double the unemployment rate.

When the oligarchs ‘stage-manage’ mass revolts and takeover the regime, the big losers include the democratic electorate and most of the protestors. Leftists and progressives, in the West or in exile, who had mindlessly supported the ‘mass revolts’ will publish their scholarly essays on ‘the revolution (sic) betrayed” without admitting to their own betrayal of democratic principles.

If and when the Ukraine enters into the European Union, the exuberant street demonstrators will join the millions of jobless workers in Greece, Portugal, and Spain, as well as millions of pensioners brutalized by “austerity programs” imposed by their new rulers, the ‘Troika’ in Brussels. If these former demonstrators take to the streets once more, in disillusionment at their leaders’ “betrayal”, they can enjoy their ‘victory’ under the batons of “NATO and European Union-trained police” while the Western mass media will have moved elsewhere in support of ‘democracy’.

[Open full article ] : http://www.4thmedia.org/2013/12/30/oligarchs-demagogues-and-mass-revolts-against-democracy/

============= 

RELATED ARTICLES: [added]


Can the Arab revolutions survive Syria and Egypt?.   By  Hamid Dabashi   http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/12/can-arab-revolutions-survive-syria-egypt-2013122971234447135.html

People’s revolution can be derailed by foreign mercenary-jihadists.  Case Qatar: Qatar Trains Death Warriors For Syria War  by Ismail Salami | Wednesday, December 18, 2013. http://www.4thmedia.org/2013/12/18/qatar-trains-death-warriors-for-syria-war/

=========== 


sábado, 28 de diciembre de 2013

FREE MARKET IN AMERICA or RAMPANT FRAUD at ALL LEVELS



FREE MARKET IN AMERICA or RAMPANT FRAUD at ALL LEVELS

Not only Monsanto prevents Americans to know what is a GMO vs. real organic product in the market. The fraud comes also from middle companies that misuse our credit cards sending products that we don’t request or charging for items that they do not send. Some of them don’t even provide the order# when you buy a product online, a sign of fraud. Free Market is FRAUD.  I’m not the only one who said so. Listen this video:

COLOSSAL FRAUD-THERE ARE NO FREE MARKETS-  By Rob Kirby  12/24/2013.

Introduction By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com   (Early Release)

Financial analyst Rob Kirby says, “There is colossal fraud and price control going on.  There are no free markets.”  Kirby goes on to say, “What we’ve seen over the last six months is a ramp-up in interest rate swaps to the tune of $12 trillion . . . . What the build in these interest rate swaps is achieving, it’s stemming the rise in interest rates.”  Kirby, who has 15 years experience in trading derivatives, says these complicated derivatives overseen by the U.S. Treasury control the price of virtually everything.  Kirby contends, “I refer to this as a price control grid.  They are able to dictate and arbitrarily set the price of all strategic goods in the market, whether it’s capitol, whether it’s energy or whether it’s precious metals.”  As an example of control, Kirby explains, “We have 10-year U.S. bond rates under 3%, and I would say the United States is actually insolvent, and we have countries like Greece where 10-year bonds are yielding over 9%.”  When does this end?  Kirby points to the finite physical gold market and massive Chinese global buying for a clue.  Kirby says, “When China doesn’t get their gold, that’s when this ends, and that might be when we have a war.”   Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Rob Kirby of KirbyAnalytics.com.    

Watch this video: 

========= 

SUPREME COURT WILL DECIDE in JAN IF THE US IS or NOT A NEO-NAZI REGIME



SUPREME COURT WILL DECIDE in JAN IF THE US IS or NOT A NEO-NAZI REGIME.
LA CORTE SUPREMA DECIDIRA EN ENERO SI LOS EU SON O NO UN ESTADO NAZI

Subject matter: NSA SURVEILLANCE

Brief introduction by Hugo Adan 12/28/13
TWO COURTS OF THE FEDERAL SYSTEM EMITED TWO OPOSITE RULES
DOS CORTES DEL SISTEMA FEDERAL EMITIERON OPUESTAS DECISIONES

It is EIHER “THE US IS NOT AN ORWELLIAN SYSTEM” vs. “4TH AMENDMENT IS TOILET PAPER”. 

The key questions are
Is the controversial argument “Al Qaeda+ 9/11” valid to suppress the US Constitution and install an Orwellian neo-nazi system?  For this argument to be valid requires to discard the hypothesis that Al Qaeda and Saudis’ sponsored 9/11 and that they got the aval of the US State agencies. (Is it true that in tower seven of NY there were implosion and also in the other 2 towers in addition to the plane-hit? Is it true that a plane full of Saudis left our country the day after 9/11 although clear prohibition to do so?). In other words, to  make valid the argument of preventing 9/11 type of terrorism, the Supreme Court must rely on facts: that America had nothing to do with the Saudis terrorism in 9/11, nor with Bush-Saudis business inside the Carlyle group; not even with providing training, and arms to Sudis jihadist mercenaries sent to Syriain in current days. Respected reports said the opposite. The Court require new official investigation on these  matters and also to re-open the official investigation of 9/11. While these investigations are pending, the suppression of any part of our magna LAW will be illegal. The Supreme Court cannot base their rule on “official lies” or  wrong assumptions. The Supreme Court should wait until the pending investigations are done. Meanwhile, the Government should call a Referendum on this matter to explore the Nation opinion on NSA SURVEILLANCE.

.

What about the nation, that is the other key question. Will our people continue tolerating the nasty invasion of Americans’ privacy and the suppression of our constitutional freedoms? Do we really live in a “land of freedom” with NSA, Monsanto & Al Qaeda deciding what is right for our life and health?. Will the Nation will have a voice on these issues?. I guess we still have a democracy, so I’m sure the nation will speak out clearly as Snowden and Manning did and stand up for our freedoms and the 4th amendment. They do represent real America. NSA, Monsanto, Al Qaeda are the reverse. These 3 monsters are killing American freedoms inside and abroad, they are not empowering our State-Nation, they are destroying it & converting us into enemies worldwide. The Supreme Court should control them, not be controlled by them. 

--------------- 

ONE COURT SAID recently :

NSA MASS COLLECTION OF PHONE DATA IS LEGAL
Vs. NSA phone surveillance program likely unconstitutional, federal judge rules (See below)

Here the neo-nazi, Orwellian rule recently released
NSA MASS COLLECTION OF PHONE DATA IS LEGAL, FEDERAL JUDGE RULES  http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/27/judge-rules-nsa-phone-data-collection-legal
By   Dan Roberts in Washington  The Guardian, 

A legal battle over the scope of US government surveillance took a turn in favour of the National Security Agency on Friday with a court opinion declaring that bulk collection of telephone data does not violate the constitution.
The judgement, in a case brought before a district court in New York by the American Civil Liberties Union, directly contradicts the result of a similar challenge in a Washington court last week which ruled the NSA's bulk collection program was likely to prove unconstitutional and was "almost Orwellian" in scale.
Friday's ruling makes it more likely that the issue will be settled by the US supreme court, although it may be overtaken by the decision of Barack Obama on whether to accept the recommendations of a White House review panel to ban the NSA from directly collecting such data.
But the ruling from Judge William Pauley, a Clinton appointee to the Southern District of New York, will provide important ammunition for those within the intelligence community urging Obama to maintain the programme.
Judge Pauley said privacy protections enshrined in the fourth amendment of the US constitution needed to be balanced against a government need to maintain a database of records to prevent future terrorist attacks. “The right to be free from searches is fundamental but not absolute,” he said. “Whether the fourth amendment protects bulk telephony metadata is ultimately a question of reasonableness.”
Pauley argued that al-Qaida's “bold jujitsu” strategy to marry seventh century ideology with 21st century technology made it imperative that government authorities be allowed to push privacy boundaries.
“As the September 11 attacks demonstrate, the cost of missing such a threat can be horrific,” he wrote in the ruling. “Technology allowed al-Qaida to operate decentralised and plot international terrorist attacks remotely. The bulk telephony metadata collection programme represents the government's counter-punch: connecting fragmented and fleeting communications to re-construct and eliminate al-Qaida's terror network.”
The ACLU case against the NSA was dismissed primarily on the grounds that bulk collection was authorised under existing laws allowing “relevant” data collection to be authorised by secret US courts.
Judge Pauley took a more sympathetic view of this relevance standard than many lawmakers in Congress, although he acknowledged it was “problematic” that many were not aware of how widely the law was being interpreted before disclosures by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
“The ACLU argues that the category at issue – all telephony metadata – is too broad and contains too much irrelevant information. That argument has no traction here. Because without all the data points, the government cannot be certain it is connecting the pertinent ones,” said Pauley.
“There is no way for the government to know which particle of telephony metadata will lead to useful counterterrorism information ... Armed with all the metadata, NSA can draw connections it might otherwise never be able to find. The collection is broad, but the scope of counterterrorism investigations is unprecedented.”
The ACLU said it would appeal the decision, starting in the New York circuit. “We are extremely disappointed with this decision, which misinterprets the relevant statutes, understates the privacy implications of the government’s surveillance and misapplies a narrow and outdated precedent to read away core constitutional protections,” said Jameel Jaffer, ACLU deputy legal director.
“As another federal judge and the President’s own review group concluded last week, the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of telephony data constitutes a serious invasion of Americans’ privacy. We intend to appeal and look forward to making our case in the second circuit.”
Judge Pauley said his ruling did not mean it was right to continue with the program, which he acknowledged was a “blunt tool” that “imperils the civil liberties of every citizen” if unchecked. “While robust discussions are under way across the nation, in Congress, and at the White House, the question for this court is whether the government's bulk telephony metadata program is lawful. The court finds it is,” he wrote. “But the question of whether that program should be conducted is for the other two coordinate branches of government to decide.”
----------- 

IN SPANISH
RECOLECCIÓN DE DATOS DE LA NSA ES LEGAL SEGÚN CORTE DE EE.UU.
By  Cony Sturm  fayerwayer.com

Una corte federal de Estados Unidos determinó que la recolección masiva de metadatos telefónicos por parte de la Agencia Nacional de Seguridad (NSAes legal. El fallo es la respuesta a una demanda presentada por la American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

El juez William Pauley dijo que el programa de la NSA "representa el contragolpe del gobierno" a Al-Qaeda tras los ataques del 11 de septiembre de 2001. La resolución entra en conflicto con otro fallo que indicó que el programa era "probablemente inconstitucional", por lo que posiblemente el caso llegará a la Corte Suprema próximamente.

El juez Pauley reconoció que el caso era controvertido, pero legal. "Aunque están ocurriendo robustas discusiones en la nación, en el Congreso y en la Casa Blanca, la duda para esta corte era si el programa de recolección masiva de datos de telefonía es legal. La corte encuentra que sí lo es", señala el fallo. "Pero la duda de si el programa debe mantenerse debe ser decidida por las otras dos ramas del gobierno", agregó.

ACLU aseguró que apelará la decisión. "Estamos muy decepcionados con este fallo, que malinterpreta los estatutos relevantes, resta importancia a las consecuencias para la privacidad de la vigilancia del gobierno y aplica mal una estrecha y desactualizada firma de leer las protecciones clave de la constitución", afirmó el director legal de ACLU, Jameel Jaffer.

------------- 

ONE WEEK BEFORE COURT RULE:  THE US IS NOT A NEO-NAZI REGIMEN.


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/16/nsa-phone-surveillance-likely-unconstitutional-judge    NSA phone surveillance program likely unconstitutional, federal judge rules

• Dragnet 'likely' in breach of fourth amendment
• Judge describes scope of program as 'Orwellian'
• Ruling relates to collection of Americans' metadata
• Read the full ruling here


NSA PHONE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM LIKELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL, FEDERAL JUDGE RULES

By Spencer Ackerman and Dan Roberts
Theguardian.com, Monday 16 December 2013

A federal judge in Washington ruled on Monday that the bulk collection of Americans’ telephone records by the National Security Agency is likely to violate the US constitution, in the most significant legal setback for the agency since the publication of the first surveillance disclosures by the whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Judge Richard Leon declared that the mass collection of metadata probably violates the fourth amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and was "almost Orwellian" in its scope. In a judgment replete with literary swipes against the NSA, he said James Madison, the architect of the US constitution, would be "aghast" at the scope of the agency’s collection of Americans' communications data.

The ruling, by the US district court for the District of Columbia, is a blow to the Obama administration, and sets up a legal battle that will drag on for months, almost certainly destined to end up in the supreme court. It was welcomed by campaigners pressing to rein in the NSA, and by Snowden, who issued a rare public statement saying it had vindicated his disclosures. It is also likely to influence other legal challenges to the NSA, currently working their way through federal courts.

The case was brought by Larry Klayman, a conservative lawyer, and Charles Strange, father of a cryptologist killed in Afghanistan when his helicopter was shot down in 2011. His son worked for the NSA and carried out support work for Navy Seal Team Six, the elite force that killed Osama bin Laden. 

In Monday’s ruling, the judge concluded that the pair's constitutional challenge was likely to be successful. In what was the only comfort to the NSA in a stinging judgment, Leon put the ruling on hold, pending an appeal by the government.

Leon expressed doubt about the central rationale for the program cited by the NSA: that it is necessary for preventing terrorist attacks. “The government does not cite a single case in which analysis of the NSA’s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent terrorist attack,” he wrote.

“Given the limited record before me at this point in the litigation – most notably, the utter lack of evidence that a terrorist attack has ever been prevented because searching the NSA database was faster than other investigative tactics – I have serious doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism.”

Leon’s opinion contained stern and repeated warnings that he was inclined to rule that the metadata collection performed by the NSA – and defended vigorously by the NSA director Keith Alexander on CBS on Sunday night – was unconstitutional.

“Plaintiffs have a substantial likelihood of showing that their privacy interests outweigh the government’s interest in collecting and analysing bulk telephony metadata and therefore the NSA’s bulk collection program is indeed an unreasonable search under the fourth amendment,” he wrote.

Leon said that the mass collection of phone metadata, revealed by the Guardian in June, was "indiscriminate" and "arbitrary" in its scope. "The almost-Orwellian technology that enables the government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States is unlike anything that could have been conceived in 1979," he wrote, referring to the year in which the US supreme court ruled on a fourth amendment case upon which the NSA now relies to justify the bulk records program.

------------------  




RELATED ARTICLE



2 GOOD CHRISTMAS’EVE articles IN: http://www.washingtonsblog.com
 
---------- 

TPP STOP THE ANTI-AMERICAN POWER GRAB  TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP IS “CORPORATIST POWER GRAB”,   said Bloomberg.   Posted on December 24, 2013 by WashingtonsBlog   

=========