THE CONFERENCE OF ENEMIES OF SYRIA

THE CONFERENCE OF ENEMIES OF SYRIA
PART 1
http://nd-hugoadan.blogspot.com/


PART 1
http://nd-hugoadan.blogspot.com/

The "Friends of Syria" Conference concluded with a consensus on avoiding a further militarization of the conflict in Syria, as more and more Arab countries have recognized that foreign intervention only results in more riots, violence and poverty.” That is the interpretation written by the Web editor Fuyu, an associate of Xinhua, the most prestigious Chinese News web. (http://english.cri.cn/6966/2012/02/25/2941s683151.htm). However , the statement “avoiding a further militarization of the conflict in Syria” and other good phrases only reflect that has been said in the 1st part –out of three- during the Conference. In the other two parts such good intention was wiped out. To explain the why of this change in few hours, we offer here some hypothesis.

By Hugo Adan. February 26, 2012


INTRODUCTION

Many people is wondering how to match the (a) “consensus on avoiding a militarization of the conflict in Syria” and (b) “avoiding foreign intervention” that only results in more riots, violence and poverty, with (c) the idea that “Arab countries have begun to realize that the United States and Europe are hiding a dagger behind a smile -- in other words, while they appear to be acting out of humanitarian concern, they are actually harboring hegemonistic ambitions” The (c) statmt is definitely the believe at the grass root level in all Muslim countries a kind od sinergycal believe that make them ready to up-rise when evidences confirmed their objectivism. Totally different thing happens at the top level, this is the case of the Prest de Tunisia and the Prest of the Arab League. The web Editor Fuyu didn’t make such difference, this is why he couldn’t match (a) & (b) with (c), suggesting the idea that there was good intentions inside the mind of those Presidents.

Real facts contradict such wishful thinking. Here the facts:

1. The fact that there are anti-Muslim behavior on all NATO allies who sponsored and finance this conference, a meeting in which the representation of the Syria’s regimen was excluded. Can the rulers of NATO and the Arab League will recognize that they themselves are co-responsible for the militarization of the conflict in Syria?

Yes or Not?

If yes, they have to assume responsibility and recognize that they are part of problem. Since the solution of the violence in Syria implies de-militarize the conflict, NATO & the AL should agree to take out all the mercenaries they placed inside Syria. That is the only wae to be honest with their statement on peaceful solution for the Syrian riddle. If they do not recognize the factual evidence of their complicity in the violence, we are dealing with liars and dishonest people. There are evidences that the US, UK and Saudis and Qatar are openly involved in the military affairs inside Syria, and evidences that NATO at global scale are involved in this violence, starting with the distortions in their mass media, their war monguerism & xenophobia.

Were they afraid of being uncovered by the Syria delegation that shows up in Tunisia? Why they did not invite them nor accepted them inside the Conference?

2. The fact that some countries member of the Arab League (AL) helped to implement before (in Irak, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt and Pakistan, to mention some of them) several of the NATO strategies designed to control and plunder the oil and riches of Muslim countries at the cost of genocide still unpunished; and the fact that the Saudi regimen and Qatar are openly providing mercenaries to disrupt peace in Syria, facts that depict the AL as instrument of NATO, as internal enemies of Muslims. Why not to think that AL is one of the agencies of the US-NATO, the real enemies of Muslims?. Why not to think that AL is the other actor who hide a dagger behind a smile and nice words, to act then after , out of real humanitarian concern for Muslims brothers?. Why not to think that AL members are being paid to implement the hegemonistic ambitions of Western powers?. One sector of the rebels, think that way, that is why they refuse to come to the Conference.

3. If the AL is really committed to respect Syria's sovereignty, and refuse any form of foreign intervention, why they recognize the “Syrian National Council” SNC. Who elected them as the "legitimate representative" for the Syrian people? and why they don’t recognize –with conditions- the government that was elected in Syria? The non recognition of the elected government is is in fact a way of covering up the foreign intervention of Western Powers inside Syria.

These facts make us to believe that AL is still being used as toilet paper by NATO.

To be credited as sincere in their statements for peaceful resolution of the conflict in Syria the AL should start demanding the immediate withdrawal of all foreign military forces inside Syria and endorse or request voice and vote inside the committee that is organizing the Referendum called by Al-Assad in Syria and join efforts –with autonomy from the government- to further democratize Syria. That would be the right way of getting credit as sincere mediators in the dialogues between the Syrian government and the opposition. If they cannot do these simple politics they are reaffirming themselves as mere puppets of NATO and one of their instrument in their current diplomacy of war.

-------------------------

THE CONFERENCE OF ENEMIES OF SYRIA
PART 2. Hugo Adan, Feb 26, 2012

http://nd-hugoadan.blogspot.com/

The “Friends of Syria” were unanimous in their conclusions, a real victory of the usual diplomacy of war for the US & NATO against Syria, now the targeted country that could obstruct the implementation of their total hegemony. How they got such consensus is the question?. The next in the list of manufactured consensus is Iran of course; and their final objective is to stop and destroy the emergency of China and Russia as new rulers of the world. US-NATO allies have the military power to do it, but they do not have the economic base to support current wars and its aftermaths and they don’t have the real international community with them.

The top hierarchy in NATO knows that if they make a wrong move, they lose everything. This could happen with the initiation of an exchange of nuclear weapons, as the Zionist and Saudis were demanding. It seems that Mossad agreed to postpone and keep down their stupid intention to bomb Iran now. The only ones that doesn’t know anything on the art war are the Saudis and they exposed their naiveness in the Conference. They almost ruin the party by abandoning the meeting. Fortunately, nobody follows them. The question is why they did it and how the owners of the circus tackled the problem.

But the main question is what is being cook in the other kitchen by Russia and China. This seems to be the best context for them to respond strongly against the US n NATO allies and wipe out them from power. The answer to this Qt we will explore it in the next article. Now let’s check the preparation, dynamic and achievement of this diplomacy of war (stage: Conference) and see later how it affects the possible unfolding of this conflict in the near future.

IGNORANCE + ARROGANCE IS DANGEROUS:
Regarding the Saudis abandoning the Conference

The alliance between US-NATO and Muslim countries is based on corrupted money. If the top bosses and their mercenaries are no being paid well, they go to the team that can do it or just create chaos all over the war. This could happens also with the US-NATO military that is being brought back home from war. If there is not money to re-incorpore them back to the normal civilian life and not job market ready to assimilate them, they will learn how to survive by using their ability. Many of them have only one single ability: shooting other people and that is dangerous. That happens in the center of the system is worse in the periphery. It means that the mercenaries that we train among the Muslim now, could later sell their ability to our enemies.

We can pay representatives from 60 countries for this conference now but we cannot hire them forever. Who is going to give me the job, China & Russia or the US & NATO, they may question themselves sooner than later. Religion could be a good binding cultural tool, but if beduins don’t have a job and only machine guns, they can look at the riches of their Saudi monarchs. A hungry belly dissolves what the religion & patriotism binds. So the Saudis and Qatars are the most vulnerable ally of the US-NATO.

Abandoning the Conference could have divided the Arab League. The Saudis may have not understood the introductory speeches full of anti-imperialism from the President of Tunisia and the President of the Arab League AL. They maybe ignore the scripts for this show and they may question themselves why we are financing these wrong parrots?.

When the ignorance and the arrogance of money meet each they create huge troubles. The organizers of the Conference should have paid another Muslim to make strong statements against the Saudis, suggesting them to call elections, start democracy and pay taxes in Saudi Arabia or demand to open an independent investigation to trial the Saudi royalty for the atrocities they committed in Bahrain recently. It didn’t happen but someone has to stop the arrogance and stupidity of those who has money. What happens with Mitt Romney in the GOP primaries is a nice example of how to domesticate such dangerous attitudes.

THE HIRED PRESIDENTS and their SPEECHES

The statement of the Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki and his warning that “either arming groups of Syrians to fight against their compatriots or introducing foreign military intervention to solve the crisis in Syria would be a big mistake”. This type of speech belong to the 1st part of the Conference: the opening meeting in which both, the Tunisian President and the President of the Arab League appears to be radical anti-imperialists.

How this happens? How to explain it?. There could be three motives for such speeches:

1. They made it themselves and its content represent what they really feel.

2. They made it but with the intention of selling themselves at a higher price. They know how to get more money from stupid Saudis and from the US-NATO sponsors of the Conference (this assumes some previous coordination between both Presidents, the Tunisia & AL presidents).

3. That speech was in the libretto given to them for the CIA agents to create a smoke screen to dissuade the uprising of Muslims against Americans who burned the Koran.There was a crow outside the compound of the conference against Western foreigner, especially agains the US.

The 2nd & 3er options were intended to protect the public image of the Presidents of Tunisia and AL to further use them to implement the NATO strategy. Do they -the US-NATO leaders- apologized in the meeting or inside doors for their recent crimes in Afghanistan. How they plan to repair such fault?.

In the case of the 1st option, if they really feel a genuine ant imperialist sentiment (perhaps the Tunisian President), how they were dissuade? How to explain that after the inside-door meeting they showed up with a totally different position?. Does one of these Presidentes or any Muslim member of the Conference asked the US-NATO leaders to quit from the Conference?. I don’t think so. The only ones who quit from the Conference were the Saudis, but for the opposite reason, for not adopting a clear position of foreign interventionism on Syria.

The inside-doors meeting (2nd part of the Conference) was used by the US, NATO allies including Saudis and Israelis to manipulate and impose their pre-defined agenda and objectives for this Conference.

In the 3rd part of the Conference, when the general meeting resumes, they read the agreements and those made it clear to the “international audience” the “Consensus of the Conference” built inside doors among the inner top-circle of puppets. The rest has to obey, not debate. That is being called a success of the Conference for the US-NATO allies. This was in fact the success of the enemies of Syria.

THE CONCLUSIONS of the CONFERENCE OF THE ENEMIES OF SYRIA

Their conclusions explain better why they are called enemies of Syria:

1. The agreed to recognize the Syrian National Council (SNC) as the "legitimate representative" of the Syrian people. This one wiped out the sovereignty of Syria and trashed the opening statements of false antimperialism.

2. They agreed to set up an Arab peacekeeping force to ensure stability during Syria's democratic transition, and credited the AL as capable and responsible for maintaining stability and peace in the region. Does the AL have really such capability. Of course not, it is their masters who have it. So, is NATO disguised as AL –just those who create the problem- the ones that will be in charge of solving the problem in Syria. What a charade!!.

3. They concluded in blaming the bloodshed entirely on the Syrian government and that the only way of solving the problem is forcing a regime change in Syria starting by demanding peacefully the Assad relinquish of power. What comes after this? the invasion of course, they did not say it, but that is common sense. So, the US & NATO allies send 1st the paramilitaries, they destabilize the country and create a big mess, just the pretext for the current diplomacy of war. The faked diplomats were a bunch of clowns representing 60 nations (nobody knows who are they) inside a phony Conference.

4. The meeting also agreed on applying tougher sanctions on President Bashir al-Assad's regime and reduce diplomatic interactions with Damascus. If this is so, Why to send Koffi Anan in the name of UN plus members of the AL to Syria?, why don’t send them to London where the Syrian National Council (SNC) -the so called "legitimate representative" of the Syrian people- is being set?. What a clowns!!.

The only thing that is serious in this Conference are the sanctions against Syrian people, starting with the USUAL PIRACY of freezing Syrian money by the US and EU banks. The France delegation said the freezing of Syrian assets in EU bank will start on Monday. They are fast & furious. Question? Do we want to “freeze” -then after- the Syrian riches in museums as it happens in Iraq when invade it? Nobody knows.

What we know for sure is the terrible threat already stated by Mrs Hillary Clinton against Assad. That is scary!. She said to the Assad regime that they would pay “A HEAVY COST" for "ignoring the will of the international community and violating the human rights of innocent people." You know what she means by “international community” and HR?. They are champions in exporting such delicacies. You remember what happens in Libya when she said “I came and he dies”? Hillary was laughing on the assassination of Gadaffi? . So, Assad is warned, unless he put first a price on her head and call the mercenaries to bid up.

Is she really planning to visit Syria? Perhaps, if she is not afraid of the Al Qaeda mercenaries hired by her and the Saudis to operate inside Syria. She said that the US already invested 10 million U.S. dollars on such “humanitarian efforts, including the support for refugees”. These mercenaries like very much the US money, of course, but they sometimes make wrong killings. I guess she is not afraid of those mercenaries!. It means, “this is a lady of cojones”. She should have been the President of the US because the one we have it, lacks such quality.

--------------------

RECENT SOURCES:

"FRIENDS" CONFERENCE REJECTS FOREIGN INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
2012-02-25 15:44:12 Xinhua Web Editor: Fuyu

http://english.cri.cn/6966/2012/02/25/2941s683151.htm

-------------------------

'FRIENDS OF SYRIA' RECOGNIZE OPPOSITION

2012-02-25 Xinhua Web Editor: Yihang

http://english.cri.cn/6966/2012/02/25/2724s683100.htm

----------------------------


PREVIUOS RELATED SOURCES: open
http://nd-hugoadan.blogspot.com

Obama Vows to Stop Killings in Syria

Syrian President "Can Still Save His Country": Hillary Clinton


======================