LECCIONES DEL CAMBIO DE REGIMEN EN
UCRANIA
LESSONS FROM REGIME CHANGE IN UKRAINE
Hugo Adan Marzo 1, 2014
1- Dilemmas before the coup , during the coup and after.
1.1
State violation of political rights (speech,
assembly, public demonstrations, etc) should
be always repudiated and outlaw it .
But, if public demonstrations became violent
and disrupting of the public order, the State has the obligation of
restore order and declare State of emergency
if a rioters kill a policeman. (Ver al
final : Escucha Venezuela!)
1.2
Foreign interventionism in domestic affairs is
not legal; it violates state sovereignty protected by international laws.
1.3
During violent coups, like the one in Ukriane, the individual right
to lifes is violated, as well as the
right of a nation to have a State instead of chaos and the tyranny of thugs.
Whoever disagree with a government in power has the right to express his/her
voice, but also the obligation to
respect a democratically elected government. A coup like the one in Ukraine
destroyed the nation unity and is now disrupting peace at international scale.
The neo-nazis in power are inviting Russian to prevent the uses of nuclear
power installed in Ukriane against their country. One leader of Sovoba party said
in public that the Sovoba
government will use the Ukraine nuclear
power against Russia.
1.4
R2P for humanitarian reason has nothing
humanitarian in its intentions and its implementation. It is a way to legalize foreign
intervention and it should be outlaw after the experience of Libia and Siria. The
crimes against humanity committed in the
nameo of R2P should be punished.
1.5
The threat of economic sanctions against the
target government for regimen change as happens in Ucranie, if implemented as it happens in
Iran, is a terrorist act against the civilian population of one country. It should
be outlawed.
1.6
After a coup comes a 3rd type of
imperial intervention. They will use the captured UN institutions to commit
piracy (appropriation of the money in foreign banks), and use the ICC to punish
the head of State deposed for crimes he did not committed but committed instead by the allies of
the interventionist force.
2- Super-powers dilemma now:
2.1 Regimen
change happens because the imperial block wants to keep the dominant structure
they have or to expand it. They do not
care for the fate of the people in the state targeted for change. Case in
point, the Baltic States assimilated to the OTAN, are now in ruins, or the same as Ukraine. When Yanukovych was stop
getting power after winning the election in 2004, he wait until 2010, the vote
difference in his favor was larger this time. He was elected to solve the
economic crisis left by the IMF and the EU. He managed to borrow money to keep
afloat the economy but the debt and trade deficit was still there and he needed
a new Loan at the end of 2013, either from the EU or Russia. The conditions of
the IMF were tough, the oligarchy supporting Yanukovych was undecided and finally, at the last minute decided in
favor of the Russian offer.
The indecision of the oligarchy and their President was used by America and NATO allies
to sabotage the State (they start taking about economic sanctions to Ukraine) while inside they were financing the
neo-Nazis coup. Instead of calling a referendum, the President called the EU and the
opposition parties to make a deal. They signed an agreement to stabilize the situation and 1 hour later they
recanted, the neo-Nazis assaulted the Parliament
(day 22 of Jan) and at gun point made a decree to impeach the President. Why?
because he was a threat to the EU.
Meaning: the loan offered by Russians will
make Baltic States to follow that example and get out from NATO and the EU. So,
it was this structure of power built on violence, frauds and
miss-information that define the defeat of Yanukovych. Now the unity of the
country is at stake. They miscalculate the reaction of Russia.
3. LESSONS FROM THE COUP IN UKRAINE:
3.1 If a State do not want to be easy target of
regimen change, consult always to the nation via referendum. Trade agreement and issues
of alignment like the one faced by Ukraine should be always consulted to the
nation. The oligarchical way to resolve the crisis behind close doors left the
Pdt of Ukraine without support of the nation. If State-Nation links are broken,
is easy target to regime change.
3.2 If the initial purpose of the opposition demonstration was
to separate the State from their nation, they succeed in this task by taking
plazas and building barricades and they will go further in their violence as it is
now in Venezuela. At the beginning, it was fine for the Pdt to prohibited the police to use guns, but
when the rioters start to using it, the Pdt should have declare State of Emergency,
suspend basic freedoms and restore order. The Pdt of Ukraine failed to do
so. He instead submitted to the
Parliament permission to do it, knowing that he has not majority in it. His
defeat was the worst thing to happens, it revealed that he has not power, or
the army was divided. He couldn’t even call the support of the civilian population
because he did consult to them -via referendum- the alignment issue. There was
not President nor State before the coup
d’état. Yanukovych reflected the
weakness of the Oligarchy he belong too.
That economic elite that was afraid of both
super-power nations and afraid of the civilian population too.
3.3 The State system in Ukraine was obsolete: If a state
cannot protect public order nor the
national security is not State. If the power of State resides in the
Parliament, the elected President should have
a chance to implement the
Political program he offered to the nation during election time, if by law
he cannot do it, then there was not democracy in Ukraine, nor respect for basic principles of legitimacy nor governability. If the Pdt is not the chief of
the armed forces with power to define in emergency situations, there was not
President. Besides, the separation of state power and the check and balance between
them was wrong or not existent. There was instead a disarticulated State system
easy to be corrupted and manipulated by bosses. That explain why the army did
not intervene and why the judiciary was in limbo, and why the parliament was
easily captured by the neo-Nazis. Now it makes sense to explain the political
default of this nation and the urgent need to discuss projects for a new constitution. Instead, the rioters in power
are calling for election to legitimize their coup. If before there is not
election to set a Constitutional
Assembly to re-define the State system, there should not be elections in May. Election presuppose new Law; the crisis revealed
that there is such a thing in Ukraine.
3.4 When McCain and Mrs Nuland came to Kiev Yanukovych received and allowed them to do what they
did: supply money and offered other supports to
the rioters. That happens since
Nov 2013 on. Yanukovych should have not provide any security to them knowing
that they were supporting with money the
rioters in Kiev. Instead, he should have closed the US and UK embassies plus
other that were practicing this illegal interventionism in domestic affairs.
Her should have outlaw the NGOs connected to them and prosecute the receivers.
He did not do it, instead he put his
head in the rope for them to lynch him and they did it.
3.5 When the EU came to sign an agreement -that was never
published- he signed. At that moment he naively trusted them. The
neo-nazi cannibals did their job, cut his head in the Parliament at gun point
when demanded his resignation. What
power? He had none at that moment, the power was in the hands of the EU. What
Ukraine witnessed was the implementation of Ms Nuland plan: “fuck the European
Union and cut the head of the Pdt”, and they did it. The coup legalized the murder
of more than ten policemen in the streets of Kiev. Since neo-nazis worked the
coup plan hand on hand with the American interventionists -the neocons Ms
Nuland and McCain- it is right to say that they are also responsible for the
killing of 82 people in this “regime change”
affair.
3.6 Once the state was destroyed, the elected President
outlawed and chased (alive or death)
they proceed with the destruction of the whole State. They create a
transitional government with the most radical neo-nazis in Key position of this
government. They came for money and they
got it, now they put a price on the nation for sale: $35 billions and the EU is
going to provide this money. They do not have money for Greeks or the Baltic States assimilated to NATO, but
they have for the neo-nazis. If before
the west supported the jihadist in
Siria, this time they are opening the doors for a more organized club of thugs:
the neo-nazis. They are now imposing their anti-russian xenophobia and the 1st thing they did was
outlaw the Russian language in a bilingual country by decree.
That was the most clear
sign of exclusion and separation of the nation in 2 parts. Of course the South
East region does not fill represented by the thug in Kiev and also creates
their own autonomous government. They are calling for referendum to decide the
issue alignment for the end of March. The west is accusing Russia of promoting separatism when
they already did it. Now the Kiev new government could disintegrate itself since the rightist wants the whole power to
them. The main leader of the neo-nazis (Svoboda party) send a kill threat to the Interior Minister ( from the allied
fatherland party) if he don’t obey they orders. They also continue
terrorizing the socialist and communists, burning their houses and chasing
them. The police are publicly humiliated
and beaten in the streets. Their bosses
and non-allied personnel have been dismissed from their jobs. Kiev is the new
kingdom of terror in Europe, all of this is being blessing by the EU as a way
to build democracy and freedom in Ukraine. Of course there are people that have
a different version of democracy and are
calling to create a front against the neo-nazis in power, as they did it in the
South East. The Pandora box for more violence was opened by the coup d’etat of
the neo-nazis.
3.7 Yanukovych speech yesterday was very deceptive : In
short “I save my life, so sorry for yours”, he said. It sounds nasty and coward, he just depicted
what the oligarchy in Ukraine really is. Now this elite have to define
their alignment-stand with the rule of “one person one vote” in the
Referendum coming in May. The new government of the South already declared their autonomy from Kiev and they are putting in
the hands of people the destiny of this autonomous region and perhaps the
building of a Federal state in the South will emerge. Separatism is on.
3.8
Now that the coup divided the country in two parts, the neo-nazis
in the North announced their plan to take control of the four nuclear sites
installed by the USSR in Ukraine. They said publicly that they will re-stock
their nuclear bases and respond to the Russsian.
This seems to be an open invitation for the
Russian to intervene and prevent their nation be heat by these thugs in Kiev. Meanwhile,
those excluded and abused by the thugs in Kiev are inviting to organize the
resistant
against neo-nazis. The black
market
selling guns in Kiev was never so
profitable as it is now.
So,
more chaos is about to come.
Is this
the freedom that the US and EU planned in Kiev?.
They may say that NATO will put order,
but wherever
NATO goes it creates more chaos, genocide and
destruction, besides putting at risk the whole humanity in a nuclear
confrontation.
SUMARIZANDO LECCIONES: Listen Venezuela!! See next article
============
