US POLICY ON UKRAINE IS BASED ON WHAT?
YESTERDAY:
We favored the violence in Kiev to toppled an elected government
and replaced by a band of thugs or Neo-nazis (you named)
More recently, we sent anti-tanks weapons to Syria to arm mercenaries (Muslim jihadists from Al Qaeda and other sects of cannibals)
TODAY:
We are sending tanks to crackdown the democratic petition to
Referendum in Donetsk, Luganst and Kharkov
Today USA Deploys Cruise Missile Destroyer USS Donald Cook to Black Sea (this is the 2nd destroyer sent over there) http://nsnbc.me/2014/04/09/usa-deploys-cruise-missile-destroyer-uss-donald-cook-to-black-sea/
Today, according to www.presstv.com NATO’s top military commander in Europe says US troops may soon be deployed to alliance member states in Eastern Europe as tensions near the border between Ukraine and Russia continue to escalate. http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/04/10/357917/us-troops-may-be-deployed-to-e-europe/
However,
According to BBC: today the US is demanding:
'Dialogue, not force'
“Pro-Russia activists have blockaded state buildings in the
cities of Kharkov, Donetsk and Luhansk
since Sunday, calling for greater regional autonomy and condemning the Kiev government”
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26965632
QUESTION?
Is there any
consistency in our commitments to democracy and freedom?
Is Ms Victoria Nuland planning to visit south Ukraine and bring
money to these democrats to resist the
tanks sent by the puppets of NATO in Kiev?
Is Senator McCain requesting arms to the new rebels?.. Why is good to send
anti-tanks weapons to the mercenaries paid by the Saudis in Syria and not to
arm democrat rebels in the South in Ukraine?
If this has nothing to do with commitment to principles, what we are defending there? Business?.. Whose Business?. NATO expansion? With whose money? How this policy will benefit our nation?
===========
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario