AMERICA NINE CLASSES THE
NEW CLASS HIERARCHY.
Submitted
by Tyler Durden on
04/29/2014
[China
creo la pólvora y Smith las 9 clases en America…
He is creative anyway]
Pero yo me quedo con “Wealth, Income, and Power” by G. William Domhoff. http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html
Una nota mas: “Para que una clase pueda ser la clase liberadora por excelencia, es esencial que otra clase sea clara y abiertamente la clase opresora”. La clase opresora es el capital imperialista y la clase que posee la “generosidad de espíritu” para ser clase liberadora es el proletariado. Con este término Marx designo al pueblo oprimido. En sus palabras, el proletariado no es resultado de “la miseria natural, sino de la miseria artificial producida por el capital; no es la masa del pueblo mecánicamente oprimida por el peso de la sociedad, sino la masa que resulta de la desintegración de la sociedad y, sobre todo, de la desintegración de la clase media”. Ver la selección de los escritos de Marx hecha por T Bottomore y M Rubel, en “Sociologia y Filosofia Social” de Marx, Edic 1983 [Hugo Adan. Abril 29, 2014]
Una nota mas: “Para que una clase pueda ser la clase liberadora por excelencia, es esencial que otra clase sea clara y abiertamente la clase opresora”. La clase opresora es el capital imperialista y la clase que posee la “generosidad de espíritu” para ser clase liberadora es el proletariado. Con este término Marx designo al pueblo oprimido. En sus palabras, el proletariado no es resultado de “la miseria natural, sino de la miseria artificial producida por el capital; no es la masa del pueblo mecánicamente oprimida por el peso de la sociedad, sino la masa que resulta de la desintegración de la sociedad y, sobre todo, de la desintegración de la clase media”. Ver la selección de los escritos de Marx hecha por T Bottomore y M Rubel, en “Sociologia y Filosofia Social” de Marx, Edic 1983 [Hugo Adan. Abril 29, 2014]
There are many ways to slice and dice America's power/wealth hierarchy. The conventional class structure is divided along the lines of income, i.e. the wealthy, upper middle class, middle class, lower middle class and the poor.
I've suggested that a more useful scheme is to view America through the lens not just of income but of political power and state dependency, as a Three-and-a-Half Class Society( http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct12/three-classes10-12.html October 22, 2012):
The three-and-a-half
class society is comprised of: the "entrenched incumbents" on top
(the "half class"), the high-earners who pay most of the taxes (the
first class), the working poor who pay Social Security payroll taxes and sales
taxes (the second class), and State dependents who pay nothing (the third
class).
This class structure
has political ramifications. In effect, those paying most of the tax are in a
pressure cooker: the lid is sealed by the "entrenched incumbents" on
top, and the fire beneath is the Central State's insatiable need for more tax
revenues to support the entrenched incumbents and its growing army of
dependents.
A recent Foreign Policy article on China's New Class Hierarchy: A Guide inspired me to assemble America's nine classes.
1. THE DEEP STATE. Mike Lofgren offered this description of the Deep State in Anatomy of the Deep State:
The Deep State is
a hybrid association of elements of government and parts of top-level finance
and industry that is effectively able to govern the nation without reference to
the consent of the governed as expressed through the formal political process.
I describe the U.S. Deep State as the National Security State which enables a vast Imperial structure that incorporates hard and soft power--military, diplomatic, intelligence, finance, commercial, energy, media, higher education--in a system of global dominance.
The key feature of the Deep State is that it makes decisions behind closed doors that the surface government ratifies and implements.
The number of people in the Deep State class is small: senior Federal officials (NSA, Pentagon, State, Treasury, etc.), Executive Branch officials and key private-sector players.
Membership in the Deep State class is not dependent on wealth so much as on relationships and power.
2. THE OLIGARCHS. Oligarchy is in the news--for example We're Headed for Oligarchy--and a number of descriptors are somewhat interchangeable: corporatocracy, plutocracy, etc. I have used Financial Aristocracy to invoke the neofeudal structure of our economy.
Whatever word you prefer, this small class is more or less the top .01% who owns a majority of the nation's financial wealth. They essentially own the political machinery of the nation, writing the rules of legislation that is supposedly regulating their industries, taxes, etc.
3. NEW NOBILITY. This is the super-wealthy class just below the Oligarchs. They own a singificant percentage of all assets but do not directly manage the political process like the Oligarch class. They hire lobbyists to protect their interests and constitute an influential political-financial class with global connections.
4. UPPER CASTE. I use this term to describe the technocrat/professional class that manages the Status Quo for the upper classes. They serve in both government and the private sector.
5. STATE NOMENKLATURA. In the Soviet Union, the Nomenklatura were the key administrators in all sectors. In the U.S., the Nomenklatura are well-paid government administrators with security and power. Collectively, they administer their own share of the swag, gaming the system to maximize their pensions, benefits, etc.
Together, the Upper Caste and the Nomenklatura comprise about 9% of the 121 million households in the U.S.: roughly 8.7 million households who earn between $145,000 and $250,000 annually. This class is the bulk of the top 7%, i.e. the top 90% to 97%.Household income in the United States.
The top level of the Upper Caste (2.8 million households) earns more than $250,000 annually. The Nomenklatura and Upper Caste number in total about 11.5 million households.
6. THE MIDDLE CLASS. While others attempt to define the middle class by income alone (many see a household income of around $50,000 as qualifying), I define the middle class not by income alone but by purchasing power, benefits and assets owned. What Does It Take To Be Middle Class? (December 5, 2013).
By this definition, the middle class is the cohort between 70% and 90%--households earning $80,000 or more. Even this is problematic, because in high-cost cities $80,000 is not enough to sustain middle-class conventions (owning a home, two vehicles, etc.) while it may be ample in lower-cost regions.
This 20% comprises about 24 million households.
The lower middle class--what I define as having some but not all of the attributes of full middle class membership--is the cohort between 50% and 70%--households earning more than $55,000 annually.
This class also comprises about 20% (24 million) of all households.
If you think this is too restrictive, please read my above analysis of middle class membership. It may change your view of what constitutes middle-class.
7. THE WORKING POOR. Roughly 38 million households have earned income but it is not sufficient to secure the basics of middle class life. Many qualify for social welfare programs such as food stamps and Medicaid.
This class is about 30% of all households.
8. STATE DEPENDENTS. Though often labeled "poor," those with minimal legal employment may be living better than the working poor, due to generous social welfare benefits such as Section 8 (housing), Medicaid (healthcare), child care, food stamps, disability, etc., and black-market sources of cash income. This class is comprised of the bottom 20% of households.
9. MOBILE CREATIVES. This is an emerging class that ranges across many income classifications and thus cannot be described by income alone. Some earn Upper Caste incomes, others are Working Poor. This class is self-employed, free-lance, entrepreneural, sole proprietors with adaptive skills. They may collaborate with other Creatives rather than have employees, and may have part-time jobs.
There are roughly 5.5 million incorporated self-employed people in the U.S.; these tend to be professionals such as attorneys, engineers and physicians. These self-employed are generally members of the Upper Caste.
The Mobile Creatives (which include small farmers, craftspeople, independent programmers, etc.) number around 10 million, or 8% of the workforce. I use the word mobile here not to suggest mobility between physical places (though that is one factor in this class's flexibility) but mobility between sectors and ways of earning income.
Members of this class might take a short-term paying gig if the pay and circumstance is attractive, and then return to self-employment. They tend to foster multiple income streams and in general operate by the principle trust the network, not the corporation or the state.
Some members of this class joined the cohort involuntarily, as the result of layoffs; others pursue this livelihood for its freedom, flexibility (important to parents of young children or those caring for elderly parents) and potential for self-expression.
This is the "wild card" class that falls outside all conventional class/income hierarchies. It includes those seeking outlier wealth and those who have chosen voluntary poverty.
Though this class wields little conventional financial or political power, it has a potentially large leadership role in social and technical innovations. This is the 4% Pareto Distribution that can exert outsized influence on the 64%.
The other eight classes are hidebound by conventions, neofeudal and neocolonial arrangements and a variety of false choices and illusions of choice, including democracy itself.
I will end this examination of the Nine Classes of America with this question: which class is having more fun? Your answer may say more about your aspirations and worldview than the class hierarchy itself.
========
RELATED ARTICLES
=========
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario