NUCLEAR DEAL WITH IRAN PRELUDE WAR, NOT PEACE “BREAKTHROUGH”

NUCLEAR DEAL WITH IRAN PRELUDE WAR, NOT  PEACE “BREAKTHROUGH”

Tony Cartalucci (Land Destroyer LD)  Published On: Tue, Nov 26th, 2013

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.dk/2013/11/nuclear-deal-with-iran-prelude-to-war.html

http://nsnbc.me/2013/11/26/nuclear-deal-iran-prelude-war-breakthrough/

Tony Cartalucci (LD) , - ”…any military operation against Iran will likely be very unpopular around the world and require the proper international context—both to ensure the logistical support the operation would require and to minimize the blowback from it. 

The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians “brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal.”

Brookings Institution’s 2009 “Which Path to Persia?” report, page 52.

The West has no intention of striking any lasting deal with Iran, as nuclear capabilities, even the acquirement of nuclear weapons by Iran was never truly an existential threat to Western nations or their regional partners. The West’s issue with Iran is its sovereignty and its ability to project its interests into spheres traditionally monopolized by the US and UK across the Middle East. Unless Iran plans on turning over its sovereignty and regional influence along with its right to develop and use nuclear technology, betrayal of any “nuclear deal” is all but inevitable, as is the war that is to shortly follow.

Exposing the duplicity that accompanies Western “efforts” to strike a deal will severely undermine their attempt to then use the deal as leverage to justify military operations against Iran. For Iran and its allies, they must be prepared for war, more so when the West feigns interest in peace. Libya serves as a perfect example of the fate that awaits nations reproached by the West who let down their guard – it literally is a matter of life and death both for leaders, and for nations as a whole.
Tony Cartalucci, LandDestroyer

-------------------  

Related news:
GENEVA NUCLEAR AGREEMENT MAY RESULT IN ISRAEL AND SAUDI ARABIA ATTACKING IRAN.      By Kurt Nimmo | Wednesday, November 27, 2013. http://www.4thmedia.org/2013/11/27/nuclear-agreement-may-result-in-israel-and-saudi-arabia-attacking-iran/ Israel and Saudi Arabia may cooperate in an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities following the announcement of a six-month interim agreement between the P5+1 and Iran on Sunday in Geneva.

ISRAEL’S OPPOSITION TO IRAN DEAL SHOWS ‘IT’S NOT COMMITTED TO PEACE’ Published time: November 27, 2013   http://rt.com/op-edge/israeli-reaction-on-iran-deal-356/     Netanyahu’s hostile statements about Iran show the imperialist nature of the Israeli regime, Caleb Maupin, an activist from the International Action Center, told RT.

===========