H CLINTON WANTS MUBARAK IN THE US. EGYPTIAN WANT HIM IN PRISON
America won’t be America without alternative voices
HAZ, february 2, 2011
Rachel Maddow made another astounding show last night in MSNBC. I wonder how different would have been the perception of Americans on the Sandinist revolution in the 1980s if Rachel and Amy Goodman would have describe what was really going on in Nicaragua. During the Reagan administration the pacific sandinist revolution -lead by brothers Cardenal and father Descoto with the support of the army and the Catholic religious branch Theology of Liberation- was wrongly depicted as communist and terrorist , when just the opposite happens, as the Iran-contra gate demonstrated.
The same happens today in Egypt: “mob of criminals” is the language used by the dictator to describe the revolution of millions of people fed up with oppression, inefficiency and corruption. Now we realize that is not the people but the police supporting Mubarak who infiltrate meeting to promote violence and is using army uniform to loot and kill innocent people. Fortunately Amy and Rachel, and other alternative voices exist and American people can have a more clear picture of reality abroad.
This real reality put against the wall to US leaders like Hillary Clinton, who openly back Mubarak. I was waiting for her to correct her mistake on Egypt and demand the immediate get out of the dictator. It won’t be the case. Mubarak speech is the evidence. I’m very disappointed and I want to put across the reason of my upset.
According to “Politico” website referred in the Maddow Blog:
“Proximity has its perils. In a 2009 interview with Al Arabiya television, Clinton defended the relationship with the Egyptian president and his wife when asked about human rights abuses by the Mubarak regime, saying, “I really consider President and Mrs. Mubarak to be friends of my family. So I hope to see him often here in Egypt and in the United States.”
That led to a Washington Post editorial questioning her ability to challenge autocratic regimes — and raised questions about Clinton’s repeated claim that the administration has long pressured Mubarak to enact much needed democratic and economic reform.
Activists are pressuring the administration to move even more quickly – and publicly acknowledge the pitfalls of helping to prop up corrupt regimes. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48658.html
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48658.html#ixzz1CoMc3k5o
My comment:
Propping up corrupt regimen is Hillary job and she like it. She has not ethical problem with sacrificing innocent life to cover up the White House mistakes. Was she behind the crimes in Yugoslavia to cover up the sex scandal of her husband: the bombing of innocent people there?. How many lives she expect to sacrifice in Egypt, while inside home the events in Egypt are used as smoke screen to cover up another failure to defend the promised dream of best health system for all Americans?. The only time she was right is when recently suggested that there is not difference between the Republican and Democratic parties. Right, both are financed by the same owners of the country and she is a good servant of the dictators inside. What is good for them is good for her, that is her policy. This is why she prop up dictator regimes like Mubarak’s abroad.
Nuestro sistema politico es absoleto pues recrea el poder economico y politico de trasnacionales y socios internos quienes impiden el desarrollo sostenido del pais. La nueva democracia tiene que armarse a partir de organizaciones de base en movimiento. Imposible seguir recreando el endeudamiento, el pillaje y la corrupcion. Urge reemplazar el presidencialismo por parlamentarismo emergido del poder local y regional. Desde aqui impulsaremos debate y movimiento de bases por una NUEVA DEMOCRACIA
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario