domingo, 27 de marzo de 2011

GATES SAYS LIBYA IS NOT THREAT TO US & OUR MISSION IS NOT REGIME NOR KILLING GADDAFI

Gates says U.S. sees Libya as no threat, not seeking regime change

English.news.cn 2011-03-28
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-03/28/c_13800619.htm

WASHINGTON, March 27 (Xinhua) -- U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said on Sunday that Libya did not pose "an actual or imminent threat" to the United States before the U.S. began its military campaign against the North African country, and regime change there "was never part of the military mission."

"No, no," Gates replied in response to a question about whether he thinks Libya "posed an actual or imminent threat to the United States," adding that "it was not a vital national interest to the United States."But he told ABC's Jake Tapper on its "This Week" program that it was an interest due to the engagement of the Arabs, the Europeans, the "general humanitarian question that was at stake" and the potential wave of refugees from Libya that "could have destabilized Tunisia and Egypt," where the two countries' long-time leaders stepped down in civilian unrest respectively in January and February.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who appeared with Gates on the program, said "Why -- how could you stand by when, you know, France and the United Kingdom and other Europeans and the Arab League and your Arab partners were saying you've got to do something."

The Obama administration is facing mounting criticism at home both from the media and politicians for not asserting clear goals and consulting intensively before launching military strikes on Libya on March 19 to set up a no-fly zone over Libya as authorized by a UN Security Council resolution.

During his campaign for the presidency in December 2007, Barack Obama told the Boston Globe that "the president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."

As to when the military strikes in Libya will end?, Gates replied that "I don't think anybody knows the answer to that."

The Americans have been weary of the wars in Afghanistan, which has been dragging on for almost 10 years, as well as in Iraq, which lasted for almost eight years.

Obama has called for Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's departure, but regime change is not one of the goals of the military operations.

"Well, first of all, I think you don't want ever to set a set of goals or a mission -- military mission where you can't be confident of accomplishing your objectives," Gates explained.

"And as we've seen in the past, regime change is a very complicated business. It sometimes takes a long time. Sometimes it can happen very fast, but it was never part of the military mission."

U.S. President Barack Obama said on Saturday that the U.S.-led military mission in Libya is "clear and focused" and achieving success.

He told the American public in his weekly radio and internet address that the U.S.-led coalition has taken out Libya's air defenses and prevented Gaddafi's forces from "advancing across Libya."

As part of the administration's publicity campaign, the White House announced that Obama will deliver an address at the National Defense University in Washington on Monday evening to update the American people on the situation in Libya.

In addition, Clinton, Gates, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper are scheduled to hold a classified briefing on Libya next Wednesday for lawmakers.

SOURCE: Editor: Mu Xuequan. http://news.xinhuanet.com/ March 27, 2011

================

NOTE FROM HAZ
March 27, 2011

The contradictions between these servants of big corporations (Obama, Gates and Mrs Clinton) do not contradict the fact that -in real US policy-making- they are violating the UNCS Res 1973. They have not power to decide how to implement the hidden agendas of the Pentagon, the military-industrial-complex and other big corporations that profit from plundering oil abroad. They really do not have real power. They endure the sad real odyssey of no knowing where and when that are going to be dumped.

In the case of Obama the picture is clear: the jewish corporate media has set in the mind of the national electorate that his mission is to kill Gaddafi, if he wants some chances to be re-elected. The pounds of the corporate jewish media -the wolfes in CNN and other war mongers -specially in Fox news- designed a trap to Obama and hide the fact that they see Obama as mere butcher and the fact that they will be more happy, really happy if the Republicans implement the zionist Israeli objective: keep the Arab divided and submited.

In the so called "US democracy" the corporate media play his role, as well as the military has their own agenda, they both serve big coporations that finance democrats and republicans. This (the assembly of big corporationis taht meet behind the eyes of the public)is the real great dictator with unlimited power, they have set up for the electorate the trap of edither vote for their republicans and democrats who are happy and have some qualities to serve their interest. This is the way "democracy" works here, the most currupt and devaluated principle.

These real rulers of the US have not moral authority to talk about Human Rights to cover up their "humanitarian interventions abroad" after what happens in Irak, Afghanistan and Palestine, to mention just a few. They committed the same crime that they see in Gaddafi's rule: to kill armed rebels. It happens in 1996, in Waco, Texas where more than 90 people were incinerated by the democratic rule of Clinton. It is just hypocritical -to say the less- to condemn in their own "hijos de puta" (is the way an american president called dictators who serve US corporations) for crimes the golden-father commit or sponsored inside and abroad. Interesting details on US human rights inside can be found in : http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-03/12/c_13208120.htm. Or in : http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-03/12/c_13208219.htm

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario